The bit about the granite vase is crazy, and it’s mind blowing to think that it took thousands of years for us to even come up with the nomenclature to describe what they were able to do as far as accuracy goes.
The bit about the granite vase is crazy, and it’s mind blowing to think that it took thousands of years for us to even come up with the nomenclature to describe what they were able to do as far as accuracy goes.
Just listen to it when you can. It is some fascinating stuff.Cliffs for those without 3 hours to spend on it today?
Somehow the Egyptians were able to turn a granite vase that is within a half of a human hair of prefect in almost every dimension.Cliffs for those without 3 hours to spend on it today?
That really wouldn't match up to anything Plato wrote about regarding Atlantis. I thought the Eye was found to be a volcanic dome.Just listen to it when you can. It is some fascinating stuff.
Can’t really cliffs 3 hours of content but these guys think the eye of the Sahara is Atlantis, they have compelling evidence as to why that span thousands of years of history
As wacky as thinking ancient people chipped massive stone obelisks weighing many tons to perfection with copper tools and then transported them many miles by rolling them on logs and pulling them with ropes?That really wouldn't match up to anything Plato wrote about regarding Atlantis. I thought the Eye was found to be a volcanic dome.
A lot of this stuff goes beyond being wacky.
they quotes his passage, and then shown the eye on sat images, its not a strech to see the similarities.That really wouldn't match up to anything Plato wrote about regarding Atlantis. I thought the Eye was found to be a volcanic dome.
A lot of this stuff goes beyond being wacky.
right, carbon dating totally works for rocks.So how do they know when the vase was made? Let me guess they carbon dated the stone.
That was my point. I thought the sarcasm was obvious.right, carbon dating totally works for rocks.
back to third grade with you sonny!
You can't carbon date inorganic materials. If you're going to call people garbage and fucking nuts, at least don't be blatantly wrong about simple things in the process.So how do they know when the vase was made? Let me guess they carbon dated the stone.
Imo 95% of the stuff on Rogans podcast is pure garbage and the guests are fucking nuts, again just my opinion. It just seems to have gotten dumber over the past few years. I quit watching.
with someone else maybe,That was my point. I thought the sarcasm was obvious.
Pride with words and nice handwriting are a bit different than feats of engineering. The engineering feats of those times you mention pale in comparison to today's yet we'd struggle to recreate some of the ancients' work even with today's technology.Look at the Declaration of Independence, not long ago, and how they took pride in their words and wrote beautifully and almost with perfection.
Go further back and see how crafty they were, how smart, how dedicated to everything they did. It doesn't trip me out to hear that ancient people were capable of creating things that to us appear to require fancy technology. We're a bunch of lazy idiots these days that rely on tech.
I think everything we believe is wrong. Well, not everything... but alot of things. You don't get the sphinx with a bunch of hunter gatherer slaves who are good with chisels.Listen, I'm not saying these guys are right. They could be wildly wrong. But at least they're trying a different approach rather than sticking with common narratives that just seem completely absurd. I mean, Gobekli Tepe kinda blew up a lot of old archaeology ideas. When you have highly developed megalithic sites predating agriculture and civilization itself per long held ideas of dates it suggests that you might have basically everything wrong.
That and LIDAR. Everywhere they've looked in the Amazon is absolutely littered with remnants of civilization.I think everything we believe is wrong. Well, not everything... but alot of things. You don't get the sphinx with a bunch of hunter gatherer slaves who are good with chisels.
Ground penetrating radar is changing history right before our eyes.
Factoring in the accepted error rate of course Carbon Dating, 3-5%, what do you find wrong about it.So how do they know when the vase was made? Let me guess they carbon dated the stone.
Imo 95% of the stuff on Rogans podcast is pure garbage and the guests are fucking nuts, again just my opinion. It just seems to have gotten dumber over the past few years. I quit watching.
Thay can and do scrape the residue of the contents and carbon date them.You can't carbon date inorganic materials. If you're going to call people garbage and fucking nuts, at least don't be blatantly wrong about simple things in the process.
Yeah, that's not stone.Thay can and do scrape the residue of the contents and carbon date them.
As wacky as thinking ancient people chipped massive stone obelisks weighing many tons to perfection with copper tools and then transported them many miles by rolling them on logs and pulling them with ropes?
So how do they know when the vase was made? Let me guess they carbon dated the stone.
Imo 95% of the stuff on Rogans podcast is pure garbage and the guests are fucking nuts, again just my opinion. It just seems to have gotten dumber over the past few years. I quit watching.
First, if you could carbon date stone it would tell you how old the stone is. Not when the vase was made. Whether the vase was made yesterday or 10k years ago. The carbon dating would theoretically be the same.Factoring in the accepted error rate of course Carbon Dating, 3-5%, what do you find wrong about it.
As I posted just after I responded to you. You do realize they scrape the residue off many old items and CD it. Should at least get you in a time frame when it was used.First, if you could carbon date stone it would tell you how old the stone is. Not when the vase was made. Whether the vase was made yesterday or 10k years ago. The carbon dating would theoretically be the same.
Second, well Ill let you figure that out.
I understand how carbon dating is used. Im also aware that many con artists have attempted to claim objects as antiquities using all sorts of techniques to try and fool modern scientific methods of dating.As I posted just after I responded to you. You do realize they scrape the residue off many old items and CD it. Should at least get you in a time frame when it was used.
They don’t claim to know when the vase was made. They claim to know when it was found. Saying It was found in Egypt somewhere about 1600 years ago and is 1 of 50,000 of them. They also go into detail about how carbon dating works and how it’s not accurate. They don’t know how old it is or how primitive people supposedly made it. That’s the question they’re posing. Dude says the 6 and 5 thousand year old stuff in Egypt is a far better build quality than the stuff that was built 4 and 3 thousand years ago.So how do they know when the vase was made? Let me guess they carbon dated the stone.
Imo 95% of the stuff on Rogans podcast is pure garbage and the guests are fucking nuts, again just my opinion. It just seems to have gotten dumber over the past few years. I quit watching.
That and LIDAR. Everywhere they've looked in the Amazon is absolutely littered with remnants of civilization.