What's new
By:
Filters

gun shots at trump rally

grumpy356 said:
The secret service failed EARLY on.

When they did the initial walk and see the roof, You put up a fucking banner or screen to block the line of site. I mean you put a guy there, but if you decide not to, you hang a fucking banner.

They didn't even need personnel to prevent this.

(and this isn't me Monday morning quarterbacking... that's what is suppose to happen) .


The one thing that annoys me most about Republicans is they suck so hard on the LEO dick, that they want to blame some DEI hire in Washington, and praise the guys in the field... The guys IN THE FIELD FUCKED THIS UP.

Trump is alive, because he turned his head. That's it.
Oh you can say .. well they killed him real quick after he shot at the president.. but at that point... it's inconsequential
Click to expand...
I don’t disagree with any of this, but if they were ordered to let it happen from higher up, the “just following orders” excuse might come in to play and give them some deniability in all of this.

I think it was a third team that’s never been pictured that took him out. I don’t think either roof team behind the stage had clear line of sight to the shooter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
M92PV4U said:
You guys are cooking your bats?:homer:
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20240719-172434.png
 
Thumping said:
They seen good enough to put a round through his head 🤷
Click to expand...
Don't go thinking that was the only counter-sniper team. We don't know. The video looked like a reaction to what they can't see, probably trained on that area since the SS knew the douche was up there the whole time. No particular point, just adding information.
 
Yota Up said:
Those are not the ones who shot the guy.
The team that made the actual shot was over 400yds away.
There is no discharge from his rifle in all the videos of those two guys constantly being posted.
Click to expand...

300sniper said:
So now they’re claiming the pictures and videos of the counter snipers we’ve been seeing are not the ones that actually shot the guy.
Click to expand...

rockota said:
This gets more and more confusing...

Sniper was 448 yards away? Why have a sniper 448 yards away and an unsecure building 150 yards away???

Shooter had a suppressor?

www.theblaze.com

Police sniper reportedly shot Trump’s would-be assassin from 448 yards away | Blaze Media

The two snipers stationed on top of the outbuildings directly behind the former president most likely did not fire the rounds that took out the shooter, experts told Blaze News.
www.theblaze.com www.theblaze.com
Click to expand...
It's not a new claim or getting more confusing. See my post from almost a week ago above.
Also, while 400 yards between sniper and shooter does not mean 400 yards from Trump but your point still stands that sniper must have been at best 250 or so from Trump yet the shooter was closer.
 
92 Green YJ said:
Human remains are a different ball game. HIV, Hepatitis, etc. generally treated with a lot more care and caution than animal guts.
Click to expand...
Spray with bleach then rinse off with hose. Done it several times with blood and pieces of flesh on the roadway. And sometimes just rinse off with water just don’t stick your face in it. UV light from the sun is fairly good at killing most blood pathogens. YMMV if night time.
 
Landslide said:
Do you think this might be true?

Click to expand...


Bearded bald dude was intriguing (would become more intriguing if I knew who he was and could confirm what he's saying that he's nonpartisan) but I gotta admit, as soon as I see anything referencing QAnon (the tweet) my bullshit meter starts bouncing off the rev limiter.
 
Now they’re saying the sniper that killed the shooter had his view blocked, and could only see the shooters scope and eye…

But another local agency also took shots at the shooter but missed.
 
M92PV4U said:
scope and eye? I thought it was an iron sight rifle?
Click to expand...
Where did that even come from? Has that been made public?

The link earlier claiming it was other snipers 400+ yards away, turns out they had no first hand knowledge of the events that day, and claimed Secret Service counter snipers don’t use bolt actions, rather SR25s. Sounds like it was just an opinion piece, not factual.
 
300sniper said:
Where did that even come from? Has that been made public?

The link earlier claiming it was other snipers 400+ yards away, turns out they had no first hand knowledge of the events that day, and claimed Secret Service counter snipers don’t use bolt actions, rather SR25s. Sounds like it was just an opinion piece, not factual.
Click to expand...
There’s an article on Fox News mentioning it posted earlier today.
 
300sniper said:
I’m not seeing it verified if the shooter’s rifle was scoped or not.
Click to expand...
In the new Unsubscribe podcast, Brandon Herrera said shooter had a 2-3MOA DPMS AR w/ a 1X red dot. Not ideal for that distance - they were discussing the idiocy of folks claiming an intentional ear shot for political gain :homer:


EDIT: here - 30 seconds starting at 6:54, should be cued up:

 
Last edited:
So if there was a sniper team that shot the retard from 440yds, where would they be?

Capture.JPG



Only spot that looks halfway viable would be just below 9 o'clock where the Mazda dealership is. No idea about elevation, but that's shooting across what's probably a busy road.
 
gt1guy said:
So if there was a sniper team that shot the retard from 440yds, where would they be?

Capture.JPG



Only spot that looks halfway viable would be just below 9 o'clock where the Mazda dealership is. No idea about elevation, but that's shooting across what's probably a busy road.
Click to expand...
The c in " Inc" at the 8.
The grey building just under "mazda".

If either of those spots had a team watching their lanes, which they should have, this would have been over before it started.

Looking at that pic I see no less than 15 really good positions... the whole 440 yards shot is a smoke screen.

(Don't forget that 440y could be anywhere between 150 feet and 4.2 miles considering "most votes in history" and 10 moving boxes/an AR weight the same with these "people".)
 
300sniper said:
Where did that even come from? Has that been made public?
Click to expand...
The pictures of the rifle laying on the roof. He might have had some sort of red dot or something that was obscured by the angle and the shitty photo but he clearly didn't have a proper "stack o' lenses in a cylindrical tube" scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
300sniper said:
I see reports of there being four sniper teams on site, and two took shots. I’m not seeing it verified if the shooter’s rifle was scoped or not.
Click to expand...
So two sniper teams had line of sight with the guy with a rifle on the roof. Cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh