What's new
By:
Filters
  • Forums will go offline Wednesday Dec 4th at 10AM CST for updates. It's a big update, so the site may be offline for a few hours.

Guess the ATF did not have a dog to shoot.

Landslide said:
The feds are currently downloading child porn into the victim’s computer… how much you wanna bet?
Click to expand...
If that is the gimmick, it could have been done months ago and been a basis for the warrant.

Does anyone ever audit their drives? Nope; it is just assumed that all is OK.
 
Texas97 said:
yeah dog, Bonanza is the state, pretty sure i know where he's coming down on this
Click to expand...
I'm kinda annoyed we didn't get an explanation of all the contrived case law they've cooked up over the last 200yr to justify the obvious legal double standard you get when the home invaders have a badge. :laughing:
 
JD Mark said:
6 AM....and who wouldn't possibly start shooting if someone is knocking on your door/breaking it down.

Branch Davidian thing all over?
Click to expand...

not the same more like the 5,000 no knocks since 1993 where the home owners shoot back.

Waco was its own complete disaster
 
Norm said:
Sounds like he went out shooting
Click to expand...
did he though? sounds like they kicked the door down and shot him in the head.
plym49.2 said:
Dude was the director of the airport. They could not have arrested him at work or in the airport parking lot?

Cries in Koresh.
Click to expand...
"It's all speculation at this point," he said. "I got a feeling that he bought something he shouldn't have. That's the only thing I can think of."

Ya sure, lets already taint the opinion by saying he bought something he shouldnt have had. ok you bet.


"The shooting came as a shock to the younger Malinowski, who said his brother was in Washington D.C., a few days ago meeting with Arkansas senators."

Crazy we live in a time where the first thought any of us with sound mind think of this is a hit piece. I would bet everything I own it was a hit.
 
Bebop said:
If it's a no knock but when they barge in you're prepared and open fire...
Are you really at fault ?

Bonanza
Click to expand...
In CT its against the law to use physical force to resist arrest even if the arrest is unlawful. You would have to defend that you didnt know it was officers by saying the officer wasn't reasonably identifiable. Which I'm sure if they "yell" police before they kick your door in counts.

Sec. 53a-23. Use of physical force to resist arrest not justified. A person is not justified in using physical force to resist an arrest by a reasonably identifiable peace officer, whether such arrest is legal or illegal.
Click to expand...
 
Texas97 said:
not the same more like the 5,000 no knocks since 1993 where the home owners shoot back.

Waco was its own complete disaster
Click to expand...

Waco pretty much kicked it off though.

Or at least it was the first nationally televised one.

No one around to see the murders on Ruby Ridge.
 
The wounded agent had non-life-threatening injuries, the ATF said.
Click to expand...

200.gif
 
It looks like the airport director is a racist in this article: Fired Clinton National executive's claims prompt HR review at Little Rock airport | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


A longtime senior executive at Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport/Adams Field said he was fired in December after the Little Rock airport's top official told him to hire a white candidate for an open position even though he scored a Black candidate as more qualified.

ADVERTISEMENT

"The next day I was terminated for what Bryan said was "differences in management styles," former operations director Charles E. Jones said in an email to two members of the Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission, referring to Bryan Malinowski, the airport's executive director. "This is not the first time I have made Bryan mad by hiring someone he didn't want."

The email, obtained through an open-records request by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, surfaced three days after the Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission spent nearly three hours meeting privately during its regular monthly meeting Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The session prompted the seven-member commission to vote publicly to instruct the airport's outside counsel to "review our hiring and associated [human resource] policies to ensure that all policies and procedures have been followed in the last quarter and they would alert us if they need to make any changes to that," in the words of commission member Stacy Hurst. "Our counsel, we would ask that if they see any conflict, they would alert us to that as well."

ADVERTISEMENT

The initial reason given for the executive session, the first item on the agenda, was "to discuss personnel matters." Pressed after the meeting for a more specific reason for the closed session -- as required by the state's open-meetings statute -- the airport's outside counsel Carolyn Witherspoon responded that the executive session was held for a disciplinary matter.
Click to expand...
 
TrailTamer said:
I’m calling BS.

“kept his nose clean” = he had issues keeping it clean.
Click to expand...

there you go, fall into that media mind trap.

knowing what i know about working in, around, and on airports... if your nose isnt clean, you dont get hired to work there.

so yeah.... this is all sketchy as hell.


now..... if he was running some illegal scams or drugs or guns using his position at the airport? its not out of the question. but it would be pretty damn difficult to do. this isnt the movies.
 
Last edited:
JD Mark said:
C'mon now...it worked for the Clintons.
Click to expand...

this is 2024 and not 1994. you used to be able to walk onto a plane with a fake name, a knife, bottle of whiskey and smoke a cigarette in 1994.

things change, Mox
 
Look at our feerless government agencies working so hard to protect us from dangerous violent extremists.
This man was clearly a danger to the community.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh