What's new
By:
Filters

Fresh thread on Election Fraud and Legal action

GWKjvXPXoAAKEBH?format=jpg&name=900x900.jpg
 
I found this documentary on YT that goes along with 2000 Mules.

 
Firstram said:
Fuck no! We need hand counted paper ballots and proper Id to vote. Anything else is prone to blatant corruption :flipoff:
Click to expand...
You could have both.

In that case of the state where they won’t take RFK off…

Say you want RFK but don’t know he’ll pull off a win. You can vote RFK and then Trump second. RFK gets booted but you still end up helping Trump instead of hurting him and helping the kunt.
 
nahmus said:
we can't even get yes or no right. Now they want to do yes no or maybe? If I had more faith in election and the people on both sides running it I might be ok with it.
Click to expand...
I will never have faith in our system again. It’s 2024 and we’re still here talking about how to make it better. No one has made meaningful progress to correct the flaws. We’re talking about it while they’re out there doing whatever it is that pleases their immoral whims
 
Here is the AFL-CIO list of reasons why voter ids should be a no go. Try to make it through the list with out laughing out loud or having a stroke.

25 Reasons Why Voter Identification Laws Are Unconstitutional (Courtesy of Wisconsin) | AFL-CIO

Did you ever wish you lived in a world where there were neutral arbiters of the facts? People who would take in the various arguments in favor of and against...
aflcio.org aflcio.org

These points should be easy to defeat as every hood :mr-t: needs an ID to buy liquor and drive their 40% interest rate hellcat
 
BigBurt said:
Here is the AFL-CIO list of reasons why voter ids should be a no go. Try to make it through the list with out laughing out loud or having a stroke.

25 Reasons Why Voter Identification Laws Are Unconstitutional (Courtesy of Wisconsin) | AFL-CIO

Did you ever wish you lived in a world where there were neutral arbiters of the facts? People who would take in the various arguments in favor of and against...
aflcio.org aflcio.org

These points should be easy to defeat as every hood :mr-t: needs an ID to buy liquor and drive their 40% interest rate hellcat
Click to expand...
Typical union propaganda, If the AFL-CIO was so concerned about it then they should put their money where their mouth is and HELP people to get an ID so they can vote, but also like a typical union they would rather cry and pass the buck and backdoor support the D party.:shaking:
 
BigBurt said:
You could have both.

In that case of the state where they won’t take RFK off…

Say you want RFK but don’t know he’ll pull off a win. You can vote RFK and then Trump second. RFK gets booted but you still end up helping Trump instead of hurting him and helping the kunt.
Click to expand...

Government suggested ranked voting.

Which means it benefits…. Government
 
Ranked choice is how Murkowski in AK got back in despite not being the people's first pick. It is NOT designed to be in the best interest of the voting public. It is intentionally convoluted and benefits those who set the system up.
 
Pony_Driver said:
Ranked choice is how Murkowski in AK got back in despite not being the people's first pick. It is NOT designed to be in the best interest of the voting public. It is intentionally convoluted and benefits those who set the system up.
Click to expand...

I don't fully understand the Ranked system, and it is employed now in California. Murkowski received more votes than any other single candidate in both the primary and the final Alaska Senate election in 2022. SO it looks like Ranked choice did not elect Murkowski, the voters did. In a conventional election, Tshibaka would have never made the final ballot and Murkowski's victory would have been even greater. I don't see how it benefits "those who set the system up". However, I don't see a need for it either. FWIW McConnell and the RINO supported Murkowski, the Alaskan Republican Party supported Tshibaka.
 
Splib said:
I don't fully understand the Ranked system, and it is employed now in California. Murkowski received more votes than any other single candidate in both the primary and the final Alaska Senate election in 2022. SO it looks like Ranked choice did not elect Murkowski, the voters did. In a conventional election, Tshibaka would have never made the final ballot and Murkowski's victory would have been even greater. I don't see how it benefits "those who set the system up". However, I don't see a need for it either. FWIW McConnell and the RINO supported Murkowski, the Alaskan Republican Party supported Tshibaka.
Click to expand...

The Dems can vote for pubs in the primary. They put Murkowski over the top in the primary. In a conventional election, she would have not been the republican nominee. Ranked voting has a tendency to elect by name recognition because people pick their first choice and then a name they heard.

I kind of like ranked voting though. I wish parties were abolished and we just vote for who we want.
 
Ranked choice causes a skewed result.

1 person 1 vote for 1 candidate. And it’s 1’s and 0’s no averaging or anything.
 
WaterH said:
The Dems can vote for pubs in the primary. They put Murkowski over the top in the primary. In a conventional election, she would have not been the republican nominee. Ranked voting has a tendency to elect by name recognition because people pick their first choice and then a name they heard.

I kind of like ranked voting though. I wish parties were abolished and we just vote for who we want.
Click to expand...

The Dem put Murkowski over the top, and over their own democrat candidate ? :confused:
 
Mikel said:
Click to expand...


I saw a woman on tv a few days ago that said there was another victory for republicans in Pennsylvania concerning the ballots. Not sure what it was, but it was before this date. If they could stop the cheating in PA, that would go a long way in righting the wrong of 2020. PA has the most electoral votes (20) of the six cheating states.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh