Anyone on Rumble seen it yet?
It’s apparently a documentary on the deaths they relate to covid VACCINE
I see people protesting its findings which makes me think it may make some points.
Some protests are valid, as they goofed up in their rush to bring this out. At least some of the deaths have nothing to do with vax, and some of the deaths were not even deaths at all, but recovered. So grain of salt with it. It's too bad that if 5% of the material is bogus it will put people off.
I wish they had someone do a full audit on it before release and trim out the BS so we could rely on everything in it.
That said, I think it still sends the right message and plan to see it myself tonight, finally.
I meen you saw it in the vid, ol gates straight up said it. Why you think he bought all that farm land? To actually make food? nopeholy fuck, if half of it is true we are at a level of evil never seen before.
At least some of the deaths have nothing to do with vax,
It's too bad that if 5% of the material is bogus it will put people off.
Kind of like Covid itself…I wish they had someone do a full audit on it before release and trim out the BS so we could rely on everything in it.
You know why he bought farm land along with every other large business owner (Walmart, Amazon, Tyson, ect)? It’s because it was the only thing they could put their money into with any kind of return. Everything else was less than inflation.I meen you saw it in the vid, ol gates straight up said it. Why you think he bought all that farm land? To actually make food? nope
This reminds me of the one about root canals. It has a few valid points. The rest of it was all bogus with quack doctors.I watched the film over the weekend.
It was interesting, but it has a lot of "attention grabbing" garbage that just make it seem like the inverse of the bullshit the left tries to sell.
If 95% of is real it's worth it.Sends the right message? You sound like "It made me feel" lib. "We dont care if its not true! It sends the right message!" Jesus fuck
If the facts arent facts then any "message" it sends is garbage.
The problem is if 5% of it is verifiably false yet the producers are willing to claim its true, it calls into question the integrity of the rest since they have already proven they don't care if they show facts or fiction billed as facts.If 95% of is real it's worth it.
Learn math. Learn reading. Don't call names because it just makes you look stupider than you already are.
Even so, as I said, the overall message is worth it.The problem is if 5% of it is verifiably false yet the producers are willing to claim its true, it calls into question the integrity of the rest since they have already proven they don't care if they show facts or fiction billed as facts.
Yeah, the problem is other than stroking confirmation bias, this film shouldn't be for someone who already believes it. It should be for the skeptic. But it can't be, because it's got holes the skeptic can poke and end up dismissing the whole thing as an attempt to change minds through lies.Even so, as I said, the overall message is worth it.
If you present 20 cases and 19 of them are bad, that is enough evidence to compel a decision.
The alternative is to throw away the 19 good ones for the sake of the 1 bad one, and be left in a situation where your decision is made based on nothing rather than something with a small margin of error.
Most things have a margin of error. Almost nothing in our world is perfect true 100% data to make decisions on.
But as I said above in my first post, in my ideal world they would have been more thorough and audited it like crazy to ensure the highest level of accuracy. It's too bad they were in such a rush.
Thats only a problem to someone looking for a problem. I watched it, the entire time thinking how glad I am to have not taken that jab. Not one time did I think, oh shit this will discredit the entire premise. bull shit. the clots are real, people are dying from it. I'm dead inside as a result of the last 3 years and will smuggly sit back and enjoy the show.The problem is if 5% of it is verifiably false yet the producers are willing to claim its true, it calls into question the integrity of the rest since they have already proven they don't care if they show facts or fiction billed as facts.
those people cannot be helped. even through 100% pure unadulterated truth.Yeah, the problem is other than stroking confirmation bias, this film shouldn't be for someone who already believes it. It should be for the skeptic. But it can't be, because it's got holes the skeptic can poke and end up dismissing the whole thing as an attempt to change minds through lies.
Yes, that is a problem. It has actually caused a few fence sitters to not watch it. If I did a bit like that, it would fine tooth comb for every detail to ensure it's squeaky clean. It's too bad that the people that make these things are the hype it up types rather than calm intellectuals.Yeah, the problem is other than stroking confirmation bias, this film shouldn't be for someone who already believes it. It should be for the skeptic. But it can't be, because it's got holes the skeptic can poke and end up dismissing the whole thing as an attempt to change minds through lies.
yes, thank god there are people out there such as yourself who are not so entrenched in their opinions that they dismiss any conflicting argument without consideration.those people cannot be helped. even through 100% pure unadulterated truth.
Dibs on yer shit.I got the shot mainly for traveling international purposes at 30yrs old, within 6 hours I had intestinal bleeding. Never had anything prior. I may be next.
It's because they're all trying to use it to make money. Waaaay easier to sell to the true believers than to sell to the skepticsYes, that is a problem. It has actually caused a few fence sitters to not watch it. If I did a bit like that, it would fine tooth comb for every detail to ensure it's squeaky clean. It's too bad that the people that make these things are the hype it up types rather than calm intellectuals.
yes, thank god there are people out there such as yourself who are not so entrenched in their opinions that they dismiss any conflicting argument without consideration.
I did lay that one on a little thick huh?