Bump steer is just the change in toe through the suspension travel, including droop or travel below static ride height.
If you have a change in toe of 0.01" though 10" of travel, then you still have bump steer. Not enough you will likely ever notice but it's still there.
If you run into a bump at speed and the vehicle changes direction or the steering wheel moves in your hands, that could be caused by a lot of different variables, but not likely because the toe changes 0.01" per 10" of travel.
Bump steer is not measured by hitting bumps at speed, it's measured by cycling the suspension in the shop.
I don’t think you know what that term means. Lots of trucks have no change in toe and lots of bump steer. (Most solid axle trucks have no change in toe)
In the context of the abomination above with a steering rack and A arms, it's toe change. In the typical IBB context, it's misalignment between the drag link and panhard, or just leaf spring ****. Bump steer can happen as a result of other things, but definitely happens when hitting bumps and is generally the first thing you should look at when the steering wheel wrenches out of your hands from a speedbump. Cycling the suspension and checking is just the easiest way to confirm you ****ed up as you build it, but that not as easy if it's already built...
Which is what my friends of almost 30 years in the video did: truck shows up, owner complains it's a handful. Friends drive the car, say "holy ****ing **** this thing
is a handful," look underneath and see that the tie rods within 5% OAL of the LCA despite being 1/3 or more of the way up the knuckle, and say "yep, ****'s got bumpsteer." No need to take the coils off and measure how ****ty it is. It's really ****ing obvious that suspension needs to be completely redone. Same thing as any of us can look at this:
And know it's going to be a handful without measuring how much of a handful it is.
Subject at hand: I can assure you that Bronco does not have 0.01" of toe change.
I'm well aware. They kinda got ****ed on packaging making it fit.
Drives me up the wall how many two bit yokels can't wrap their mind around the TTB being a singular A-arm on a line that just so happens to not be parallel with the chassis.
Naw, A arm is self-supported (no trailing/radius arm) pivoting relatively perpendicular to the chassis. Self-supported in line with the chassis is trailing arm, somewhere in between is semi-trailing arm . TTB is, well, TTB. Other than whoop scissors, or swing arm (but not really), nothing really to call it. It's spashul.
Every suspension expect for a very limited number of special cases has bump steer. This includes full hydro solid axles and when the following the typical placement guidelines for double wishbone. The questions is how much bump steer and how it shows up.
Take TJ style Y steering, it has a change in the heading of the axle, toe change (driver's side), and uneven link arcs. A JK has uneven arcs and axle heading change. A full hydro axle only has the axle heading change. Double wishbone's show up as toe change.
It is possible to know that a car is going to have bumpsteer with a decent enough view of the suspension is shown. I won't comment on how much the bronco in question has since I couldn't find a good enough view, but based on some of the other things about that build I wouldn't be horribly surprised if it had quite a bit.
Those very special cases probably chased bumpsteer at the cost of all else and likely handle or steer (or both) like ****.
