Ghetto fab / Hack fab

memix-skeptical-dog.webp?text=Hmm...webp

When you say Toe I think what you mean is Steering Angle. Those are 2 different things.
Steering angle to me is the median of both tires angles, toe has to do with the difference between each tires angles. I guess you could use angle for single wheels but toe requires both wheels.
 
Every suspension expect for a very limited number of special cases has bump steer. This includes full hydro solid axles and when the following the typical placement guidelines for double wishbone. The questions is how much bump steer and how it shows up.

Take TJ style Y steering, it has a change in the heading of the axle, toe change (driver's side), and uneven link arcs. A JK has uneven arcs and axle heading change. A full hydro axle only has the axle heading change. Double wishbone's show up as toe change.

It is possible to know that a car is going to have bumpsteer with a decent enough view of the suspension is shown. I won't comment on how much the bronco in question has since I couldn't find a good enough view, but based on some of the other things about that build I wouldn't be horribly surprised if it had quite a bit.
 
See also: Every stock TTB truck. :laughing:
Funny thing is TTBs are one of the easiest ones to get 0 toe change on. Draw a line between the two frame points, put the frame steering point on that line. Other end goes anywhere. Doesn't mean 0 overall though.

Too many people view steering as 2d projections instead of as a 3d puzzle.
 
Lol what did I start.

First linked suspension I built would dive to the passenger side when ever I hit a speed bump. There is a lot of variables sure but putting the panhard on the same length/plane as the drag link got rid of it entirely. Can hit whoops and feels very stable now.

I was able to figure that out with a tape measure and a level, was not really that hard. You 100% can feel bumpsteer by hitting bumps.
 
Eh. It's from the angling of the line.
I'm well aware. They kinda got ****ed on packaging making it fit.

Drives me up the wall how many two bit yokels can't wrap their mind around the TTB being a singular A-arm on a line that just so happens to not be parallel with the chassis.
 
I'm well aware. They kinda got ****ed on packaging making it fit.

Drives me up the wall how many two bit yokels can't wrap their mind around the TTB being a singular A-arm on a line that just so happens to not be parallel with the chassis.
94 Ranger, 6' Skyjacker lift with 1" spacers under the coil and 4" drop pitman, hitting whoops at speed resulted in sawing the wheel back and forth like a drunken sailor to keep it going straight. Once I learned how to cope with it, it was fine, but **** whoever else drove that thing :laughing: definitely needed more pitman arm.
 
Bump steer is just the change in toe through the suspension travel, including droop or travel below static ride height.

If you have a change in toe of 0.01" though 10" of travel, then you still have bump steer. Not enough you will likely ever notice but it's still there.

If you run into a bump at speed and the vehicle changes direction or the steering wheel moves in your hands, that could be caused by a lot of different variables, but not likely because the toe changes 0.01" per 10" of travel.

Bump steer is not measured by hitting bumps at speed, it's measured by cycling the suspension in the shop.
I don’t think you know what that term means. Lots of trucks have no change in toe and lots of bump steer. (Most solid axle trucks have no change in toe)
In the context of the abomination above with a steering rack and A arms, it's toe change. In the typical IBB context, it's misalignment between the drag link and panhard, or just leaf spring ****. Bump steer can happen as a result of other things, but definitely happens when hitting bumps and is generally the first thing you should look at when the steering wheel wrenches out of your hands from a speedbump. Cycling the suspension and checking is just the easiest way to confirm you ****ed up as you build it, but that not as easy if it's already built...

Which is what my friends of almost 30 years in the video did: truck shows up, owner complains it's a handful. Friends drive the car, say "holy ****ing **** this thing is a handful," look underneath and see that the tie rods within 5% OAL of the LCA despite being 1/3 or more of the way up the knuckle, and say "yep, ****'s got bumpsteer." No need to take the coils off and measure how ****ty it is. It's really ****ing obvious that suspension needs to be completely redone. Same thing as any of us can look at this:

1777993186026.png


And know it's going to be a handful without measuring how much of a handful it is.

Subject at hand: I can assure you that Bronco does not have 0.01" of toe change.

I'm well aware. They kinda got ****ed on packaging making it fit.

Drives me up the wall how many two bit yokels can't wrap their mind around the TTB being a singular A-arm on a line that just so happens to not be parallel with the chassis.
Naw, A arm is self-supported (no trailing/radius arm) pivoting relatively perpendicular to the chassis. Self-supported in line with the chassis is trailing arm, somewhere in between is semi-trailing arm . TTB is, well, TTB. Other than whoop scissors, or swing arm (but not really), nothing really to call it. It's spashul. :flipoff2:

Every suspension expect for a very limited number of special cases has bump steer. This includes full hydro solid axles and when the following the typical placement guidelines for double wishbone. The questions is how much bump steer and how it shows up.

Take TJ style Y steering, it has a change in the heading of the axle, toe change (driver's side), and uneven link arcs. A JK has uneven arcs and axle heading change. A full hydro axle only has the axle heading change. Double wishbone's show up as toe change.

It is possible to know that a car is going to have bumpsteer with a decent enough view of the suspension is shown. I won't comment on how much the bronco in question has since I couldn't find a good enough view, but based on some of the other things about that build I wouldn't be horribly surprised if it had quite a bit.

Those very special cases probably chased bumpsteer at the cost of all else and likely handle or steer (or both) like ****. :flipoff2:
 
Last edited:
Check out this video.



A solid axle truck can absolutely have a change in toe due to suspension travel. Full hydro being the obvious exception. The change in toe is simply caused by arc's of different radius. In a link suspension solid axle truck with a panhard/track bar, this is why it's so important to get the track bar and the drag link to be very similar. In a leaf spring solid axle, the axle theoretically moves straight up and down, while the drag link moves in an arc.

Other than breaking as a result of over exuberant suspension travel, how does a solid axle have toe change...?
 
Other than breaking as a result of over exuberant suspension travel, how does a solid axle have toe change...?
I suppose if a solid axle is mounted on radius arms, they swine in an arc. As they arc, the toe would change unless it has zero toe. It wouldn’t be much though. I doubt you could even feel it.
 
I suppose if a solid axle is mounted on radius arms, they swine in an arc. As they arc, the toe would change unless it has zero toe. It wouldn’t be much though. I doubt you could even feel it.
A solid axle is just that: a solid connection between the knuckles. The radius arms connect to the axle assembly and it all moves in an arc as an assembly. There should be zero change in toe due to suspension travel (bumpsteer) unless you're talking about super minor flex in joints...

Only measurable change in "toe" should be due to Ackerman, but that's not bumpsteer, nor is it how you measure toe. Something is breaking or broken if a solid axle has measurable bumpsteer due to suspension travel (bump/droop).
 
A solid axle is just that: a solid connection between the knuckles. The radius arms connect to the axle assembly and it all moves in an arc as an assembly. There should be zero change in toe due to suspension travel (bumpsteer) unless you're talking about super minor flex in joints...

Only measurable change in "toe" should be due to Ackerman, but that's not bumpsteer, nor is it how you measure toe. Something is breaking or broken if a solid axle has measurable bumpsteer due to suspension travel (bump/droop).
I understand all that and I agree it would be negligible. I don’t think you follow what I’m saying.

If you have two tires that are exactly parallel, it doesn’t matter where they touch the ground, they will have the same toe. (That toe being zero) But if you have any plus or minus toe set, it matters where the tires touch the ground. Make sense?

Another way to explain. Let’s say you have 5 degrees of toe with the pinion level. If you spin the whole axle so the pinion is straight up, the toe effectively becomes camber and you have zero toe. Get it?

Obviously, the arc of a radius arm is not going to be anywhere close to swinging the pinion straight up, but you can’t say there’s no change in toe.
 
I understand all that and I agree it would be negligible. I don’t think you follow what I’m saying.

If you have two tires that are exactly parallel, it doesn’t matter where they touch the ground, they will have the same toe. (That toe being zero) But if you have any plus or minus toe set, it matters where the tires touch the ground. Make sense?

Another way to explain. Let’s say you have 5 degrees of toe with the pinion level. If you spin the whole axle so the pinion is straight up, the toe effectively becomes camber and you have zero toe. Get it?

Obviously, the arc of a radius arm is not going to be anywhere close to swinging the pinion straight up, but you can’t say there’s no change in toe.
Ah, yeah, I see what you're saying.

But yeah, it's not gonna steer the vehicle.
 
Naw, A arm is self-supported (no trailing/radius arm) pivoting relatively perpendicular to the chassis. Self-supported in line with the chassis is trailing arm, somewhere in between is semi-trailing arm .
So what about those multi-piece Chrysler A-arms with the seperate tension strut?

What happens when you weld the radius arm to the beam? Inboard the radius arm bushing?

The geometry is a triangle regardless of where it is. Some people are just dumb and can't get that.
 
So what about those multi-piece Chrysler A-arms with the seperate tension strut?

What happens when you weld the radius arm to the beam? Inboard the radius arm bushing?

The geometry is a triangle regardless of where it is. Some people are just dumb and can't get that.
No clue what Chrysler A-arm you're talking about. Generic would be control arm. A arm (AKA wishbone) is this:

1778085288811.png


But yeah, it's a triangle in the end. They do behave differently (especially shock angles) depending on type.
 
saying the thing was a ton of bumpsteer when you haven't cycled it is suspect at best.

What makes you think they haven't? The dudes in the video do have the Bronco in their garage... (the point would have been better if they took the time to show it on camera)
 
I've done that before but I ended up welding the leaves together to help spread the load.
Problem now is not being able to find a stock scout II main leaf! IHPA Zaed suggests I move to 2" 2wd square body 56" leaf springs. But I need this junk back on the trail for end of June.
 
Top Back Refresh