Adding a non-relevant person into debate over a race they have no chance of winning?
Why not just pick randos out of a hat and have them do the same thing?
Nah, your idea is the typical "what went wrong" speculation, even if you're not heartbroken over Trump, you're just looking back and troubleshooting items that aren't sources of trouble.
The idea that there isn't ENOUGH policy debate is absurd. There has never been more policy debate than today, that's why cutting down the field to 2 is so useful.
I mean look at your argument. Billions of tweets, FB posts, forum posts every single hour, 25/7/365 and you think the problem is LACK of debate? There are more political action groups, think tanks, and private media firms than ever before, by multiples.
The idea that there is not enough discussion doesn't even make sense. There is too much, so cutting it to 2 is good.