Win!

Ranch Hand said:
, I heard of one disappearing in the piney woods, never to be heard of again.
Click to expand...
When I was about 12, I thought about wanting to be a game warden
About 60 seconds later I realized that I would be out in the woods bothering people that want to be left alone, with no one around, and the percentage of them having high powered rifles were very high, and I'd be the last one to know if a bullet was going to come my way
so I crossed that off of my list of potental careers

I dont know why more dont disappear
 
Ranch Hand said:
Those assholes can enter any private property without a warrant in Texas. The bastards have more power than the sheriff. When I lived in East Texas, I heard of one disappearing in the piney woods, never to be heard of again.
Click to expand...
Same here. They got way too much power. I have even heard stories about the cops calling a game warden in to go in first somewhere without a warrant on a “hunting violation suspicion.
 
In Idaho:

In Idaho, Fish and Game conservation officers generally cannot enter private property without permission, unless they have a warrant, are responding to an emergency, or are acting under specific legal doctrines. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The rules governing their access include:
  • The "Open Fields" Doctrine: Similar to other law enforcement, officers can legally step onto open fields, forests, or farmland (not immediately surrounding a home) to investigate wildlife violations if they have "reasonable suspicion" or probable cause. [1, 2]
  • Building a Case: Officers generally need landowner consent or a court-issued warrant to enter private land not open to public access, search outbuildings, or enter the immediate curtilage surrounding a residence. [1, 2]
  • Policy Mandates: Idaho Fish and Game has a formalized Entry onto Private Lands Policy requiring officers to obtain landowner consent whenever possible. [1]
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
In Idaho:

In Idaho, Fish and Game conservation officers generally cannot enter private property without permission, unless they have a warrant, are responding to an emergency, or are acting under specific legal doctrines. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The rules governing their access include:
  • The "Open Fields" Doctrine: Similar to other law enforcement, officers can legally step onto open fields, forests, or farmland (not immediately surrounding a home) to investigate wildlife violations if they have "reasonable suspicion" or probable cause. [1, 2]
  • Building a Case: Officers generally need landowner consent or a court-issued warrant to enter private land not open to public access, search outbuildings, or enter the immediate curtilage surrounding a residence. [1, 2]
  • Policy Mandates: Idaho Fish and Game has a formalized Entry onto Private Lands Policy requiring officers to obtain landowner consent whenever possible. [1]
Click to expand...
how do drones fit into that
I see that local cops have them with them all the time now
 
ThePanzerFuhrer said:
Same here. They got way too much power. I have even heard stories about the cops calling a game warden in to go in first somewhere without a warrant on a “hunting violation suspicion.
Click to expand...
That may have been true decades ago but the game wardens nationwide have been reigned in with several federal court case. They have to abide by the same 4th amendment rules as everyone else. The ONLY difference is if they see you in the act of hunting or fishing or carrying said equipment where it is reasonable to believe you were just in the act they can stop and ask for ID.
 
Toxic masculinity.

1780672905714.png
 
What is interesting is that the driver of the first tank really did make efforts not to hurt the guy. Unlike the rest of the PLA who slaughtered thousands of unarmed people that day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh