Win!

Run a single protester over who is trying to block the facility and see how fast the others stop blocking it. There is a simple solution for every problem....
there's not a doubt in my mind that one of these idiots is going to get run over and somehow blame everyone else. Newark cops aren't allowed to help. I'd just set up some sprinklers and annoyingly soak em all until they give up. Maybe some dye in the tank just for fun.
 
Here is the solution:
1780088850629.png


You have the right to protest, but it must be done from the sidewalk, not the road. Move them to the sidewalk.
 

Simpsons Writer Enters 2028 Race, Immediately Polls Ahead Of AOC Among Voters Who Remember Jokes​

J.K. Around
by J.K. Around

May 29, 2026

in Entertainment, U.S. News
0
the simpsons



WASHINGTON — The Simpsons writer Dan Greaney announced he is running for president in 2028, instantly terrifying Democrats after voters realized a man who helped write fake politics for a cartoon may be overqualified for real politics, sources have confirmed.

Greaney unveiled his “America For All” campaign while dressed like a biblical prophet who wandered out of Springfield and into a C-SPAN fever dream.



He promised common sense, affordable groceries, and a federal ban on politicians explaining things through Instagram Live.

AOC reportedly watched the announcement from behind her bulletproof glass case, jaw dropped, eyes wide, and one intern gently waving smelling salts labeled “Working-Class Appeal.”

“This is devastating,” whispered one DNC strategist.

“Between JD Vance talking like an actual human and Greaney understanding comedy, AOC’s lane is collapsing faster than a Green New Deal budget estimate.”

Greaney’s campaign immediately released its first ad: a silent 30-second clip of a normal family buying eggs without needing a government task force.

Political analysts called it “the most powerful Democrat messaging since Bill Clinton pretended to feel pain.”

AOC attempted to respond with a 47-minute livestream about systems, vibes, and billionaires, but viewers left after realizing Greaney’s campaign had already made three jokes and one coherent point.

As of press time, AOC was demanding a recount of the jokes while Greaney surged among voters tired of politicians less believable than cartoon mayors
 
Yep, play stupid games win stupid prizes. Stay the **** out of the road. We were all taught that from a very young age for good reason.
You know, all this was worked out in 1973. Ah la Solet Green. Garbage trucks with scoops. Scoop, Lift, Dump, Compress. How? Weld the dumpster to the arms and cut out the front. Would you like Green, Red or Blue?
 
On May 29, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order ***led "Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands," which rescinds two Nixon- and Carter-era executive orders governing off-road vehicle (ORV/OHV) use on public lands.

Background on the Rescinded Orders
  • Executive Order 11644 (February 8, 1972, signed by President Nixon): Directed federal agencies (e.g., BLM, U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service) to designate areas and trails for off-road vehicle use while minimizing damage to soil, watersheds, vegetation, wildlife habitats, and other resources. It also aimed to reduce conflicts with other recreational users and protect natural, aesthetic, or scenic values.

  • Executive Order 11989 (May 24, 1977, signed by President Carter): Amended the 1972 order, clarifying agency authority to close areas immediately if ORV use caused or was likely to cause considerable damage. It allowed closures until impacts were mitigated.
These orders applied to vehicles like ATVs, dirt bikes, and snowmobiles designed for cross-country travel on unpaved terrain. They shaped travel management plans on BLM, Forest Service, and some other federal lands for over 50 years, often leading to route designations, closures, or restrictions to protect resources.

What the New Order Does
  • Rescinds EO 11644 and 11989 entirely.
  • Directs agencies (Interior, Agriculture, etc.) to initiate rulemakings to rescind or revise implementing regulations.
  • Argues the old criteria were vague, subjective, hard to operationalize, and created barriers to multiple-use management, energy/timber production, and access. It cites modern technology (e.g., better mapping) and existing statutes (NEPA, FLPMA, Endangered Species Act, etc.) as sufficient for balanced management.
  • Aims for more access, recreational opportunities, and "greater multiple use benefits," while claiming to maintain environmental protections via statutory authorities.
Potential Impacts
  • On BLM and National Forest lands: Could lead to revised travel plans with expanded ORV access on roads/trails, fewer closures, and shifts away from strict "minimization" criteria. This aligns with broader Trump administration goals for recreation, resource development, and reducing regulatory burdens.
  • National Parks: The orders contributed to broad prohibitions on off-road use in most parks (limited to designated roads in some cases). Effects here are less immediate or certain, as NPS has its own authorities, but it could open the door to more proposals or challenges. Related legislation (e.g., in Utah) has sought to expand OHV access in some parks.
  • Reactions:
    • Supporters (e.g., off-road groups like ORBA, BlueRibbon Coalition) see it as restoring access and fixing outdated rules that overly restricted recreation.
    • Critics (e.g., Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, environmental groups) warn of increased damage to soils, wildlife, habitats, and quiet recreation experiences, plus conflicts with non-motorized users.
This fits into a larger set of Trump administration actions emphasizing energy dominance, multiple-use management, and expanded public access to federal lands. Implementation will depend on agency rulemakings and any legal challenges. For the full text, check the White House site.
Hopefully this is a uuuuuuuge win.
 
"Illegal hunting."

:crybaby:

It's my land. I should be able to use it how I want.
cops didn't specify that they were looking for landowner. just for illegal hunting taking place. Landowner confirmed that others were illegally hunting on his land.

Dunno what laws are in that state but they can and do vary.
 
cops didn't specify that they were looking for landowner. just for illegal hunting taking place. Landowner confirmed that others were illegally hunting on his land.

Dunno what laws are in that state but they can and do vary.
Just the term is all. And from the perspective of using my land.

Before I moved where I am now, I had never hunted. When we got there, I got so excited because I could drop a deer any time I wanted. Got a crash course education there.
 
cops didn't specify that they were looking for landowner. just for illegal hunting taking place. Landowner confirmed that others were illegally hunting on his land.

Dunno what laws are in that state but they can and do vary.
As the judge stated...the officers were on the land illegally. They are not allowed on private property without a warrant.
 
Those assholes can enter any private property without a warrant in Texas. The bastards have more power than the sheriff. When I lived in East Texas, I heard of one disappearing in the piney woods, never to be heard of again.
 
Top Back Refresh