feed them to the fat peopleFrom a limited government point of view, what is the proper way to deal with those people?
Better idea, send them to your house.feed them to the fat people
Ok we will eat the crazy people and the felons but we don't. want. the Irish! I'm trying to cut down on the alcohol.feed them to the fat people
well then we'll feed you the fat people after they've been fed the irish and the craziesOk we will eat the crazy people and the felons but we don't. want. the Irish! I'm trying to cut down on the alcohol.
meh, meth already visits from time to time, my neighbor spotlights them and shouts at them usuallyBetter idea, send them to your house.
The countries you listed just call involuntary commitment/prison something else. You can't camp on the street there without being picked up and placed somewhere. You can't be crazy/out of your mind on drugs without the 'state' dealing with you in some way. Just because they don't call them "mental institutions" or "prisons" doesn't mean they aren't the equivalent.I just read the whole thread. at Rocky trying to look smart by saying drugs are not the problem, when anyone with more than two brain cells realizes it's addiction that's the problem.
There's no easy answer. ACLU correctly got the institutions shut down purely on the rights infringement principle, but of course there was fallout from that decision. I'd be interested in knowing what other countries do, Nordic, Germany, Portugal, Spain (Mikel). I know Germany has a very progressive prison policy, and of course China has re-education camps, so there has to be something in between.