billdacat
No road...no problem.
Nice.....
What the hell? CA is that close? Looks like only 5% gap or so and not a D landslide like always before.Latest with California 87% reporting:
What the hell? CA is that close? Looks like only 5% gap or so and not a D landslide like always before.
This place really could go red in the future.
That's total voters nationally.What the hell? CA is that close? Looks like only 5% gap or so and not a D landslide like always before.
This place really could go red in the future.
What the hell? CA is that close? Looks like only 5% gap or so and not a D landslide like always before.
This place really could go red in the future.
That's total voters nationally.
This graph is for the country to track the discrepancy between 2020 and 2024. I mention California in my updates because it's a state that's slow to report with ~22 million registered voters, so it can have a big impact on the total count.What the hell? CA is that close? Looks like only 5% gap or so and not a D landslide like always before.
This place really could go red in the future.
22m registered voters... wonder how many votes they are actually gonna record? 23m... 24m...This graph is for the country to track the discrepancy between 2020 and 2024. I mention California in my updates because it's a state that's slow to report with ~22 million registered voters, so it can have a big impact on the total count.
The actual spread in California is much wider, but Rs picked up quite a few votes compared to 2020.
Why would they risk cheating in a state that predictably goes blue?22m registered voters... wonder how many votes they are actually gonna record? 23m... 24m...
You'd be surprised. Also, the fallacy in most "% reporting" is it's not vote totals, its voting precincts. Some voting precincts might have 1000 registered voters, some 100000, so that's why you can't just take 14.2m/87*100 and get the final vote total. It might be close depending on the state, but won't be that accurate. If LA County had a few precincts that hadn't reported yet, the number might be higher than you expected.Why would they risk cheating in a state that predictably goes blue?
They currently are showing 14,262,055 votes and claiming 87% reported... so it's looking like a little over 16 million votes will be the total.
Historically California has a larger voter turnout than the national average, so that tracks.
Ok.That's total voters nationally.
Was he ballsy enough to endorse him before the election or did he wait until it was safe to say something after Trump won?
Cool, I genuinely didn't know. I don't really follow any celebrity news unless it's shit being shoved in my face.Dont know about Trump, but he's been a loud critic of wokeness.
This could get ugly