What's new
By:
Filters

WATCH LIVE: Hearing to decide if Fulton DA Fani Willis will be disqualified from Trump case

WashingtonMatt

WashingtonMatt

Nobody
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Member Number
2708
Messages
1
Loc
Stanwood, WA
This lady... I don't see how they can let Trump's case continue.



Day 2


Day 3


Day 3 part 2


Day 4 closing arguments


Day 5 senate committee (won't let me embed more than five)
www.youtube.com

LIVE: Attorney for Trump co-defendant testifies before senate committee investigating Fani Willis

Ashleigh Merchant, attorney for Trump co-defendant Michael Roman, was subpoenaed before a Georgia senate committee investigating Fulton County District Attor...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

Decision
www.youtube.com

LIVE: Fulton County DA Fani Willis must step aside from Trump case or remove special prosecutor

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can remain leading her historic racketeering indictment of former President Donald Trump if special prosecutor Na...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
 
Last edited:
BDK said:
I think Trump needs a new trial attorney. That blonde didn't impress me as being a good examiner.
Click to expand...
I agree but you’ve got a bunch of “I’d examine her” comments coming
 
She is a pretty disgusting example of a businesswoman of color. She puts to shame those women who actually take pride and try to do their job with moral standards.

You can practically smell the ghetto hood corruption through the screen as she jacker her cockholster.
 
east_beast said:
If he'd pay his legal bills he'd probably be able to hire better legal representation. Justing saying.
Click to expand...
I obviously don't know but assume he has a line of people waiting for the job, at least after today
 
bgaidan said:
I'd give her her day in court.


:flipoff2:
Click to expand...
1000001207.jpg
 
WashingtonMatt said:
This lady... I don't see how they can let Trump's case continue.



Day 2
Click to expand...

I watched all of Friday's court testimony.

Going into Friday; I gave it less-than-likely Trump will win this (40% yay/60% nay).
Concluding Friday's testimony; I now give it 80% yay/20% nay.

I think she will be disqualified along with the prosecutor BF.
I further think the IRS will want to talk to both of them for possible taxes owed/not reported.:laughing:
Further; adultery is a crime in Georgia; that may weigh in to the judge's decision making.
Trump's witness, former law partner with prosecutor Wade, quite possibly opened some serious doors regarding personal texts/commo he (Trump witness) had with prosecutor Wade.
Because said witness, even though he's a lawyer, possibly didn't/doesn't know what attorney/client privilege is/means.

Monday they're going to go through said witness's testimony and see if Trump's lawyers can in fact open those doors.

Cliff's Notes:
Friday's testimony pretty much sunk the DA and prosecutor's careers and will likely be disqualified.
 
CDA 455 II said:
I watched all of Friday's court testimony.

Going into Friday; I gave it less-than-likely Trump will win this (40% yay/60% nay).
Concluding Friday's testimony; I now give it 80% yay/20% nay.

I think she will be disqualified along with the prosecutor BF.
I further think the IRS will want to talk to both of them for possible taxes owed/not reported.:laughing:
Further; adultery is a crime in Georgia; that may weigh in to the judge's decision making.
Trump's witness, former law partner with prosecutor Wade, quite possibly opened some serious doors regarding personal texts/commo he (Trump witness) had with prosecutor Wade.
Because said witness, even though he's a lawyer, possibly didn't/doesn't know what attorney/client privilege is/means.

Monday they're going to go through said witness's testimony and see if Trump's lawyers can in fact open those doors.

Cliff's Notes:
Friday's testimony pretty much sunk the DA and prosecutor's careers and will likely be disqualified.
Click to expand...

I have pretty much decided that I would be really surprised if anything happens the either of them.

It seems there is no force in this universe that will go against the anti Trump movement.
 
CDA 455 II said:
Trump's witness, former law partner with prosecutor Wade, quite possibly opened some serious doors regarding personal texts/commo he (Trump witness) had with prosecutor Wade.
Because said witness, even though he's a lawyer, possibly didn't/doesn't know what attorney/client privilege is/means.

Monday they're going to go through said witness's testimony and see if Trump's lawyers can in fact open those doors.
Click to expand...


I watched that on Friday. It was fuckin' gold.

Bradley flat out lied under oat and so did Wade.

They both claimed there was no disagreement or negative reason that Bradley left the partnership. And then it came out that he sexually assaulted an employee.


"There was an allegation that you sexually assaulted one of the employees in the firm?"
-That is incorrect......but.....but.....yes.
:lmao:

 
bgaidan said:
I watched that on Friday. It was fuckin' gold.

Bradley flat out lied under oat and so did Wade.

They both claimed there was no disagreement or negative reason that Bradley left the partnership. And then it came out that he sexually assaulted an employee.


"There was an allegation that you sexually assaulted one of the employees in the firm?"
-That is incorrect......but.....but.....yes.
:lmao:

Click to expand...

Monday; If the judge decides Bradley did open the door, Trump lawyers are going to have a field day on his texts with Wade.:laughing::laughing:
 
bgaidan said:
I just watched some clips again. Was it the State's attorneys that opened the door to the assault allegations and privilege stuff?
Click to expand...
Correct; she threw him under the bus in order to destroy his testimony/credibility.
She inadvertently may have very well opened the door/the Pandora's Box/the can of worms on his commos with the DA and prosecutor.

The lawyer podcasts I was watching were all saying/yelling, ''What does she (the state) have to gain from this?!!":lmao::eek:
 
Last edited:
BDK said:
I think Trump needs a new trial attorney. That blonde didn't impress me as being a good examiner.
Click to expand...
Agree; she doesn't know how to ask concise/precise questions.
Longwinded; the judge even commented, "You talked for 3min and I haven't heard a point yet.":laughing::homer:

She's visually pleasing, though.:smokin:
I always love an Amazon blonde!:grinpimp:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh