What's new

The U.S. Government Made a Powerful New Kind of Nuclear Fuel

nahmus

Refugee from syrup
Joined
May 19, 2020
Member Number
121
Messages
773
Loc
East Coast
This could be really good for building some new nuclear plants. In reading the article i did not see if this could be used in existing plants.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a34128801/us-government-makes-new-kind-of-nuclear-fuel/

  • A new, U.S.-made nuclear fuel could improve outcomes in existing nuclear plants.
  • Thorium is a popular talking point as a way to "clean up" nuclear energy.
  • One advocate says having a U.S. nuclear product also improves our diplomatic position.

Could a new blended thorium fuel improve U.S. nuclear power’s outlook? Scientists at the Department of Energy’s Idaho National Laboratory have a new fuel called Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life, or ANEEL. It's a proprietary mix of thorium and low-enriched uranium, and Forbes’s James Conca says it could help close the gap in a near future where nuclear seems like the only option.


The mix itself is a secret, but thorium—pictured above in pellet form—has continued to gain momentum as an alternative nuclear fuel.


“[T]horium has a higher melting point and lower operating temperature which makes it inherently safer than straight U and more resistant to core meltdowns,” Conca explains:
“The ANEEL fuel has a very high fuel burn-up rate[, which] means the fuel stays in the reactor longer and gets more energy out of the same amount of fuel. [It’s] prohibitively difficult to make into a weapon. [And] ANEEL fuel will reduce the waste by over 80% and end up with much less plutonium. Less spent fuel means less refueling, less cost, less fuel handling and less volume to dispose.”​







Thorium has a number of advantages over uranium, and especially over highly enriched uranium. Yes, thorium must be paired with at least a small amount of a fissile material, because it isn’t naturally fissile on its own. But it’s much more plentiful than uranium and found in high quantities in the kinds of developing markets where Conca says nuclear will be clutch in coming decades—starting with India.



“India itself has more Th than U, particularly as monazite sands, a reason they have been pursuing Th in nuclear reactors for decades,” Conca writes. This, he suggests, lends itself to a more mutually beneficial arrangement where Indian thorium can be turned into U.S.-made ANEEL fuel and then exported to India.

In turn, this can lead to improved diplomacy. “Whenever the United States is involved in another country’s nuclear program, that country signs various agreements related to security, weapons nonproliferation and nuclear materials, including nuclear fuel,” Conca explains
Idaho National Laboratory’s partner in ANEEL include Texas A&M University and startup Clean Core Thorium Energy (CCTE). The company started fitting existing reactor designs to use ANEEL fuel, which it says can enter commercial use as early as 2024. Conca argues that having a ready-to-use solution will help clean up nuclear efforts in places where he believes nuclear is the only feasible option. Reactors also don’t need to power down to refuel with ANEEL. He writes:
n developing nations, the need is urgent. Most do not have the infrastructure to install natural gas, wind or solar. Additionally, many do not have sufficient topography and river flow for hydro. So it’s either coal or nuclear. If you care at all about the environment, then it better be nuclear.”


One of the record holders for longest operating time for a nuclear plant, Conca says, is an Indian reactor that is already compatible with ANEEL. In a near future where humankind faces difficult energy decisions, he argues, this fuel is a good idea.

 
iirc ain't the thorium cycle relying on breeder reactors?
aka: politics says no new technology only ancient garbage reactors
 
There's nothing new about thorium as a reactor fuel. People were playing with it with good results up until the 70's when it got shelved in favor of uranium, partly due to some technical issues with thorium reactors and mostly to generate bomb fuel.
 
[486 said:
;n142706]iirc ain't the thorium cycle relying on breeder reactors?
aka: politics says no new technology only ancient garbage reactors

anything to break thru the political shell game would be a win
 
There's nothing new about thorium as a reactor fuel. People were playing with it with good results up until the 70's when it got shelved in favor of uranium, partly due to some technical issues with thorium reactors and mostly to generate bomb fuel.

I think this is the first time that thorium and uranium (not highly enriched) are used together for fuel.
 
I think this is the first time that thorium and uranium (not highly enriched) are used together for fuel.

I suppose that probably is a new approach. U235 had been used to start the thorium reaction (it breeds U233 during the reaction as I recall) but mixing U238 with thorium isn't something I'm familiar with as a primary fuel. Yes I'm a radiochemsitry geek.
 
[486 said:
;n142706]iirc ain't the thorium cycle relying on breeder reactors?
aka: politics says no new technology only ancient garbage reactors

Thorium reactors are breeder reactors, but not in a way that makes them good for making plutonium 239 like uranium reactors are. They end up making the stuff that it consumes during the nuclear reaction. The molten salt cooled reactors apparently make it easier to extract materials for weapons manufacture but it's not efficient enough to really warrant the use for that.
 
Top Back Refresh