What's new

Soros funded DAs and riots

Projectjunkie

Whatever
Joined
May 19, 2020
Member Number
306
Messages
2,869
Loc
Tucson Az
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/494316-soros-prosecutors-blm-hatecrime/

Democrats and the US mainstream media have insisted that tales of George Soros’ malign influence on US politics are conservative conspiracies. Americans targeted by prosecutors whose elections he financed can testify otherwise.

Take the case of two Californians who are facing ‘hate crime’ charges for painting over a Black Lives Matter mural outside the Contra Costa County courthouse during the Independence Day weekend.

Nichole Anderson and David Nelson are being prosecuted by District Attorney Diana Becton, who described BLM as “an important civil rights cause that deserves all of our attention,” (emphasis added) and insisted that “we must address the root and byproduct of systemic racism in our country.”
ALSO ON RT.COMCalifornia couple charged with HATE CRIME for painting over city-approved BLM mural
A former judge with no prosecutorial experience and dogged by accusations of plagiarism, Becton was elected in 2018 thanks in no small part to $275,000 poured into her campaign by Soros.

The Hungarian-born Democrat mega-donor became obscenely wealthy through currency speculation, before turning his eye towards influencing politics. In addition to funding various Democrats in state and congressional races, Soros invested heavily in local elections, where his money could make a much bigger difference.

He specifically targeted district attorneys, who in the US make all the prosecutorial decisions on a local level. In 2018, he invested more than $2.7 million in DA races in California, according to the Los Angeles Times. This was on top of the more-than $16 million he spent since 2014 on 17 district attorney races across the US, with his candidates winning 13 of them.
ALSO ON RT.COMSoros spends big on leftist candidate in San Diego district attorney elections
One of those candidates is Kim Gardner, the circuit attorney in St. Louis, Missouri since 2017. She returned the favor almost immediately, playing a key role in the prosecution of Republican Governor Eric Greitens over alleged invasion of privacy. The case eventually imploded, but not before it served its purpose in forcing Greitens to resign.

Given Gardner’s history, it should not have come as a shock when she released every single person arrested during the George Floyd riots at the end of May, which claimed the life of retired police Captain David Dorn.
ALSO ON RT.COMCatch and release: Rioters jailed in St. Louis and New York set free by local prosecutors
Nor should it be a surprise that Gardner is currently trying to find a way to press charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the St. Louis couple who defended their house with a rifle and a handgun after a crowd of ‘peaceful’ Black Lives Matter protesters demolished the gate of their community last month.

The McCloskeys have already been vilified in the media as racist, for daring to stand up for their property against the mob that threatened to kill them, and they have had to board up the house due to repeated violent demonstrations outside. To make the irony even greater, Mark is a lawyer who has represented victims of police brutality. None of it matters to Gardner, of course – the Narrative must be served.
ALSO ON RT.COMWATCH couple armed with rifle & handgun defend their mansion as BLM protesters crash into rich St. Louis neighborhood
Kim Foxx of Cook County, Illinois is another Soros-funded DA. She infamously tried to cover for actor Jussie Smollett after he staged a hate crime against himself in February 2019. Though Foxx dropped the charges, Smollett is now facing a special prosecutor.

Even in races where Soros did not get directly involved, Democrats who won embraced his policy of ‘criminal justice reform’. While it sounds lofty in theory, in practice it has mainly consisted of refusing to prosecute most offenses committed by minorities in the name of ‘racial justice’.

For years, Democrats have denounced ‘big money’ in politics. That rhetoric suddenly stopped once Soros became openly involved. Any time anyone brings this up, they denounce it as a “right-wing conspiracy theory” and even anti-Semitism – though the Israeli government begs to differ. Yet the proof of the pudding is in selective prosecutions, driven by racial grievance-mongering and intended to send a message to Americans that some people are, actually, above the law.
 
It's not exactly secret info that Soros dumps millions annually into progressive political organizations, political PACs, ect in the US and the UK. BLM, MoveOn, ect have been heavily and publicly funded by him. He pumps millions into local state elections annually just like Bloomberg does attempting to flip battleground states blue. The donations are all public information.
 
It's not exactly secret info that Soros dumps millions annually into progressive political organizations, political PACs, ect in the US and the UK. BLM, MoveOn, ect have been heavily and publicly funded by him. He pumps millions into local state elections annually just like Bloomberg does attempting to flip battleground states blue. The donations are all public information.

Correct, but this article ties the cause and effect together
 
The source is a Russian State news site?

That can't be biased.

LOL

Hello surf80, welcome to irate4x4, you've been here 17 hours and have posted 11ish times, all in political posts. Please point out un truths in the article I posted, and then tell us more about yourself
 
So, are you ready to refute facts?

I want to see something from a reliable source before I'll buy into it. The russian media IS NOT reliable. Show me something worthwhile.
BTW, many here will automatically discount anything from CNN, so me discounting from russian media is no different.
 
Man, if you are going to hold everybody to that standard it's going to get quiet in here! :flipoff2:

Sorry, I should have typed "any thread" rather than "a thread" . . .

. . . just like Geezer Söze should've typed "my discounting" instead of "me discounting" . . .

Let's just assume that perfectificationizing is unpossible :cookie:

screws-fall-out-all-the-time-the-world-is-an-imperfect-place-quote-1.jpg
 
You've spoken up, you've claimed my source is unreliable, then given ample opportunity, refused to support your position. Your trolling is un succesful, and you have shown yourself to be a ****. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, ****.

If you don't quote that motherfucker, then his trolling will be unsuccessful.

Your inability to resist the bait, by definition, made his trolling successful. :homer:
 
If you don't quote that motherfucker, then his trolling will be unsuccessful.

Your inability to resist the bait, by definition, made his trolling successful. :homer:

Never quoted, only the punctuation, out of respect for those with him on ignore.
As for feeding the troll, he took poisoned bait and doubled down versus hit and run
 
Never quoted, only the punctuation, out of respect for those with him on ignore.
As for feeding the troll, he took poisoned bait and doubled down versus hit and run

OK, so my statement should've read "don't engage" instead of "don't quote" if you need literal guidance.

The point is: if you can't leave the bait alone, his trolling is successful :homer:

Trying to prove he's full of shit? He already knows that, guaranteed.
He's starved for attention, & sources say he beats off when someone reacts to his bullshit. :laughing:
 
OK, so my statement should've read "don't engage" instead of "don't quote" if you need literal guidance.

The point is: if you can't leave the bait alone, his trolling is successful :homer:

Trying to prove he's full of shit? He already knows that, guaranteed.
He's starved for attention, & sources say he beats off when someone reacts to his bullshit. :laughing:

Maybe, but look at posts 2 & 7, then look at that users last post and most recent activity. That's a rat treading lightly, afraid to take more poison bait.
 
Maybe, but look at posts 2 & 7, then look at that users last post and most recent activity. That's a rat treading lightly, afraid to take more poison bait.

I'm old enough to remember when quoting ANY Russian propaganda outlet as a "news source" would immediately be discounted as not credible. You should try OANN, or Gateway Pundit if you don't like such criticism.

🤣
 
I'm old enough to remember when quoting ANY Russian propaganda outlet as a "news source" would immediately be discounted as not credible. You should try OANN, or Gateway Pundit if you don't like such criticism.

🤣

Then you remember when CNN was considered as reliable a news source as Al Jazeera?

Can we agree that now it is not?
 
I'm old enough to remember when quoting ANY Russian propaganda outlet as a "news source" would immediately be discounted as not credible. You should try OANN, or Gateway Pundit if you don't like such criticism.

🤣

Don't dodge it, refute the facts or be labeled a ****

And tell us a little about yourself and what brings you to irate4x4
 
Top Back Refresh