Penetrode Offroad
Red Skull Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Member Number
- 493
- Messages
- 520
Couple more and it woulda survived.Riveting the Titanic together. 3 million rivets.
Couple more and it woulda survived.Riveting the Titanic together. 3 million rivets.
The tool man fucked up and grabbed the big box of single use rivets instead of the permanent onesCouple more and it woulda survived.
Gotta be careful who the tool bitch is.The tool man fucked up and grabbed the big box of single use rivets instead of the permanent ones
Who needs a lift
Keep in mind, income tax didnt start until after 1913, and the % was much lower, and has steadily crept up, along with social security, etc etc etcNot TOO far off of a current household income to cost ratio.
Goog says US average for an 'Associate Engineer' is $85k/yr, and that an average car is $48k or 56.5% of annual income.
This fact-sheet from U of Missouri says in 1900-1909 decade an engineer made $1k and that car was $400 or 40% of annual income.
Other kewl factoids from that page...
In the United States...
- Wage-earning men made an average of $11.16 per week in 1905. Source: Census.
- Wage-earning women made an average of $6.17 per week in 1905. Source: Census.
- Solid gold wedding rings were priced at $4.76 in the 1908 Sears catalog (source).
- Black-owned farms had an average value of $434 according to the 1900 Census.
- College tuition was free at the U of MO in 1900. Dorms cost $12-$28/year.
- Milk cost 14¢ per half gallon in 1900. Source: U.S. BLS
- Coffee averaged 23¢ per pound in 1900. Source: U.S. BLS
- Around 4,200 passenger cars were manufactured in the year 1900 (source), when the U.S. population was 76.3 million (source).
- Selected occupational earnings in 1900:
- In 1903, an estimated 15,000 Americans had a net worth of $300,000 or more. Source: Financial Red Book preface.
- Life expectancy was 48.2 years for males and 50.7 for females in 1900. Source: BLS
Library Guides: Prices and Wages by Decade: 1900-1909
Links to government documents and primary sources listing retail prices for products and services, as well as wages for common occupations.libraryguides.missouri.edu
Anyhow, all that said, our current vehicles are a way better bargain in terms of comfort and reliability per hour at work.
That $48k car our engineer buddy bought is going to have AC, cruise, maybe leather seats. Power windows. It'll go 150k miles without major repairs.
The Sears car is slow, unreliable, etc.
I still want one though!
Which is pretty fucked if you think about how low the prices vs income was in the middle of the 20th century.Not TOO far off of a current household income to cost ratio.
Using the googlator the same U of Misery research says that an average mid-level engineer in the 1960's is in the $12k/year range and an average car is in the $2800 range. So our engineer buddy is spending 23% of his annual income on a brand new car.Which is pretty fucked if you think about how low the prices vs income was in the middle of the 20th century.
Was ~annual 7 years ago when we bought.I'm going to guess that not too many of us have a home valued at 1x our annual these days..............
Using the googlator the same U of Misery research says that an average mid-level engineer in the 1960's is in the $12k/year range and an average car is in the $2800 range. So our engineer buddy is spending 23% of his annual income on a brand new car.
His house also had a median value of $11,900 - or just less than one year's salary.
I'm going to guess that not too many of us have a home valued at 1x our annual these days...............
If mud truck guy was alive in the 1930's.
The average home was 1289 sqft in 1960, with an average of 3 1/3 people living in the home.Homes had a median value of $11,900 in 1960. Source: US Census Bureau
Had some of my fiance's work friends over the other night. Their kid ran around a bit (nothing bad) then went and got into the dog crate. I looked at it's parents and they were cool with it so we just left it in there for quite a while and enjoyed our drinks
Another thing to consider is the actual construction of that '60s house. It was likely 2x4s with some terrible insulation if it even had any. Roofing, siding, windows etc. are all nothing even close to what's used today.The average home was 1289 sqft in 1960, with an average of 3 1/3 people living in the home.
The average home in 2022 was 2300 sqft, with an average of 2 1/2 people living in the home.
The average home in 1960 also didn't have a garage (or had a single car garage if they did).
The average home in 1960 had relatively few electrical outlets, no "prewire" for surround sound, CATV or network, no "stone" countertops, no dishwasher, no microwave, etc...
We've not only increased the size of our homes, we've also added technologies that didn't exist in 1960, and we've increased the quality of the finishes of the average home.
While these comparisons are interesting, it doesn't take into consideration the additional costly "conveniences" found in modern day homes and automobiles. Not to mention the reprogramming of the average mind to be so consumer driven that perfectly good electronics are "thrown away" in favor of the current generation (e.g. iPhones, 1080p -> 4K -> 8K, etc...), not to mention "throwing away" something because it stopped working when in 1960 you took it to a shop for repair.
It is a combination of the increase in cost of goods, the increase in "throwing away" items, the increase in technology and increase in sizes that has driven our price to income ratios upward when compared to previous generations.
I owned one of those goofy things for a month, in a Jetta. I'm a caveman who is uninterested in making obeisances to vagcom, so off to Clist it went. Good riddance to its' 3 fuel tanks and Fuel Balancing Module.Germanic technology
Life expectancy was 48.2 years for males and 50.7 for females in 1900.
Rowbotham and Clayton (JRSM 2008;101:454–62) make a very important point when they draw attention to the life expectancy at birth compared to life expectancy at 5+ years of age.1 They state ‘… life expectancy in the mid-Victorian period was not markedly different from what it is today. Once infant mortality is stripped out, life expectancy at 5 years was 75 for men and 73 for women.’ In 1995 Griffin2 produced a comparison of life expectancy of mature men (15+years of age) at different points in history over the last 3000 years ( Table 1).
Almost exactly.I'm going to guess that not too many of us have a home valued at 1x our annual these days...............
Another thing to consider is the actual construction of that '60s house. It was likely 2x4s with some terrible insulation if it even had any. Roofing, siding, windows etc. are all nothing even close to what's used today.
no W engines in jettasI owned one of those goofy things for a month, in a Jetta. I'm a caveman who is uninterested in making obeisances to vagcom, so off to Clist it went. Good riddance to its' 3 fuel tanks and Fuel Balancing Module.
Not to mention the differences in "code" that make things more expensive to build now vs then.Another thing to consider is the actual construction of that '60s house. It was likely 2x4s with some terrible insulation if it even had any. Roofing, siding, windows etc. are all nothing even close to what's used today.
Oh yeah, that's it. Mostly known as "Have you got that piece of shit out of the driveway yet?"no W engines in jettas
they did put them in passats for a short bit
That would be the proposed rail-line.I wonder what the dashed red lines mean?