YotaAtieToo
Thick skull
So if you went and looked at trailers, looked under and saw that, you'd write the check for $16kI'd have zero issues with it
I have some fab projects I can sell you.
So if you went and looked at trailers, looked under and saw that, you'd write the check for $16kI'd have zero issues with it
So if you went and looked at trailers, looked under and saw that, you'd write the check for $16k
I have some fab projects I can sell you.
It was a trade. I had my trailer list for $12k with brand new 14 ply tires. Or trade for another 14k+ trailer. I think I would have been able to sell it for $10k, but I kept the tires. I think I did OK. I am stoked to have this trailer, should be more useful for me. Even if I have to modify it a bit.Not if I had other options but clearly you bought it.
All joking aside, no, that wouldn't bother me.
Yeah, 4500# spread across two tires. Still not a tremendous amount. This section is the dovetail though right? Planning on loading a one ton dually backwards with the front end down on the dove?
If you're nitpicking the supports, why aren't you concerned about that much weight on the 1/8" metal decking if the axle happened to land between supports?
You do understand that the main c channel cross member would have to bend as well for the small scrap piece to bend? That cross member is held at the ends so it would have to bend as well. You're overthinking it more than a woman would
The angle of the pic made me think it was the dovetail.
If you're ok with the deck getting bent, idk what the fuck you're complaining about. With large point loads, that deck will turn into a pretzel long before those crossmember supports bend.
Again, not the best way to address the issue on pj's part, but not the worst either.
With the amount of shit I have seen hauled on 2x lumber, I wouldn't have given c-channel a second thought.
Where's the engineers to put this in SOLIDWORKS and run some stress testing?
It's not over thinking at all, it may or may not fail or bend. But that doesn't make it OK. Not for a trailer company that markets themselves as top of the line.
It's pretty bad that on a forum that used to be fab oriented, that people think that's an OK way to build things.
Pretty sad that most can't see the problem.
I guess that's why this forum is all chit chat and no tech anymore.
are you more interested in being right or being correct?
Yet you get annoyed that no one agrees with you and then double down on condescending comments towards those who disagree.I really don't care, I'm not the one who brought it up after 2 weeks.
I can see debating whether or not it will actually fail.
What I can't understand is saying that it's a perfectly fine way to build something that will cost $14k+
At first glance, I royally misinterpreted what you postedhave you hammered the poop pipe in there yet?
Yet you get annoyed that no one agrees with you and then double down on condescending comments towards those who disagree.
You’re pretty emotionally tied to being right… with no interest in being correct.
Yes, I do, bending a 3" channel crossmember isnt a huge feat.
It's not over thinking at all, it may or may not fail or bend. But that doesn't make it OK. Not for a trailer company that markets themselves as top of the line.
It's pretty bad that on a forum that used to be fab oriented, that people think that's an OK way to build things.
take some scrap c channel the same size, weld it to a piece of 1/4 to constrain the ends, and toss it in your shop press with something on top to distribute the load - similar to the crossmember on top and bottom that your trailer has. I bet your 20ton press bypasses or you chicken out because the press frame is creaking before the channel fails.
bending c channel by its self isn’t impressive, but with the way it’s constrained by the welds and the loading it has there, you’re totally fine.
I think the tech you perceive to be lacking from this forum is trying to tell you it’s going to be fine.
since when is a PJ a high end trailer? thats like calling a ford escape high end because its a ford and not a kiaI get what you're saying. Either the welds have to fail, or the legs have to deform for it to crush. If I had c channel around, I'd do it. I don't think it would take as much as you think to get it to crush.
Again, my point is that it's a piss poor way to make up space on a "high end" trailer. Well, that's how they market them at least.
since when is a PJ a high end trailer? thats like calling a ford escape high end because its a ford and not a kia
I would say that it is a step above the low end ones that are welded by blind people in a hurricane with a MIG welder but I wouldn't call it much higher than a mid-grade trailer (at least not from what I've heard of people who bought new ones and were not happy with the quality).since when is a PJ a high end trailer? thats like calling a ford escape high end because its a ford and not a kia