jimmy123456789
Jackass
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2020
- Member Number
- 2312
- Messages
- 140
I have seen this firsthand, so I understand both sides of the argument.It's not uncommon for techs to rape warranty. Stuff like making up fictitious diagnostic procedures, saying a part is bad but just sending the new one back after making it look dirty, running time for work that isn't really being done, etc. Hard to take any pride in your work at that point, but sadly I can't completely fault the people who do this. Warranty times have always been bullshit. It's usually going to take the same amount of time to perform a repair regardless of whether it's customer pay or warranty. No real reason for the tech to be paid less for his time.
I’d like some info as to exactly HOW the time studies are done, how many times do they do the job before they average it up and get the “time”? What are the circumstances of doing the work? What sort of tools does the tech doing the job have available, how many techs do the job when studying the time? Is it one guy doing it 10 times and taking the average of that? Or is it 10 guys doing it once and using that average time? What’s the condition of the vehicle and the work area the work is being done in?The warranty time is the real time. The normal time is "what the market will bear".
How many hours of book time does a typical tech that isn't playing on their phone and jerking off in the bathroom making assuming the service writer doesn't fuck them? Well over the 40hr they spend at work.
The devil is in the details as to how that time was calculated and there’s too many unknown variables for you to say that warranty times are accurate and customer pay is inflated.
And yes, in a busy shop with enough work and good writers it’s not hard to average 50-60+ hours in a 40 hour week. But too many techs get fucked by dumbass writers and warranty times, as I don’t think for a minute that warranty times are “the real time”.