Gatorgrizz27
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Member Number
- 756
- Messages
- 886
We all know that the libs will go right back to ramming gun control down everyone’s throats after the election, regardless of who wins.
Unfortunately, they won’t attempt a mass confiscation, it will be bit by bit like the bump stock ban. First AR pistols, then 40 rounders and drums, then 30 rd mags, then an AWB with a grandfather clause.
The vast majority of gun owners are spineless and will either comply, justify a grandfathered ban (“I don’t care, I’ve got mine, you should have bought yours already too”), or just hide them in their attic and brag privately what a badass they are (“I lost all my stuff in a boating accident.”)![Shaking :shaking: :shaking:](https://data.irate4x4.com/assets/smilies/shaking.gif)
I get that nobody with a family, house, career, etc is going to fly the Gonzales and take their last stand for the right to own a gimmick like a Magpul D60, but it’s not going to stop with that.
I’ve finally jumped on the NFA train with a couple cans, I haven’t been a fan of “registering” things with the gov, but if you buy ammo online and have a CHL they already know enough. With that barrier out of the way, I will probably end up with filing SBR paperwork for one of my AR’s. This has brought to mind whether the NFA process with its additional paperwork, fingerprints, long-standing laws, etc, could all be used to protect guns from a future grab. It seems filing everything that might fit under a an AWB as an SBR/SBS might allow it to be passed down to your kids if they have a “no transfer” clause as part of it, or keep them in your possession is they go full bore “hand them in now.”
Thoughts one way or the other?
Unfortunately, they won’t attempt a mass confiscation, it will be bit by bit like the bump stock ban. First AR pistols, then 40 rounders and drums, then 30 rd mags, then an AWB with a grandfather clause.
The vast majority of gun owners are spineless and will either comply, justify a grandfathered ban (“I don’t care, I’ve got mine, you should have bought yours already too”), or just hide them in their attic and brag privately what a badass they are (“I lost all my stuff in a boating accident.”)
![Shaking :shaking: :shaking:](https://data.irate4x4.com/assets/smilies/shaking.gif)
I get that nobody with a family, house, career, etc is going to fly the Gonzales and take their last stand for the right to own a gimmick like a Magpul D60, but it’s not going to stop with that.
I’ve finally jumped on the NFA train with a couple cans, I haven’t been a fan of “registering” things with the gov, but if you buy ammo online and have a CHL they already know enough. With that barrier out of the way, I will probably end up with filing SBR paperwork for one of my AR’s. This has brought to mind whether the NFA process with its additional paperwork, fingerprints, long-standing laws, etc, could all be used to protect guns from a future grab. It seems filing everything that might fit under a an AWB as an SBR/SBS might allow it to be passed down to your kids if they have a “no transfer” clause as part of it, or keep them in your possession is they go full bore “hand them in now.”
Thoughts one way or the other?