Gavin Newscum orders homeless camps torn down across Cali

[SomeGuyFromOlympia]

locally we had this happen
our Governor all of a sudden cleaned up a bunch of homeless camps

Ironically, they were along the exact path that Biden was taking when he was in town to grab money from his puppet masters

dog and pony show

 

[chaplinfj60]

the worst part about the entire situation is no matter what the govt does. it just moves the problem some where else. sure bus them out of town. then the new camp starts there. sure hand out piles of drug let nature run its course. more will just show up. jail them, hell that would make most happy because they get fed.

damn if you do damn if dont

 

[IH-SSII]

Push them into AZ and NV. Just watch.

 

[JTreadway]

What took so long?

A bigger political opportunity. That's what.

 

[JR4X]

Can we store them in a camp in Death Valley?

 

[Honky Lips]

Can we store them in a camp in Death Valley?

Beat me to it. Let’s just ship them all out somewhere they cannot survive and every time we find someone on the street they have a month to get off the streets after that they go to death Valley with the rest of them it’ll be like the desert version of the donner party.

 

[JR4X]

Beat me to it. Let’s just ship them all out somewhere they cannot survive and every time we find someone on the street they have a month to get off the streets after that they go to death Valley with the rest of them it’ll be like the desert version of the donner party.

Have you seen the movie “The Bad Batch”

 

[Ditchrunner]

This will accelerate the growth of squatting in private buildings, where the tax paying citizens aren’t allowed to evict like the State can. Private holdings will lose all value, taxes will not be paid, State will confiscate and tax auction to, you guessed it, Pelosi-connected entities.

 

[Projectjunkie]

Load them all up on boats and drop them off 100 miles...

OK, I'm not that cold. But I sure as fuck don't want them coming east

 

[Hooligan]

When has he ever gave two shits what the supreme court has to say?
He certainly doesn't listen to them when it comes to the second amendment.

SCOTUS and that Constitution only matter when it benefits their agenda

 

[ExWrench]

Load them all up on buses and drop them off 100 miles outside of town.

East Bay cities used to have their cops put all the bums on the night's last BART train headed to SF

He is now allowed to by the recent SCOTUS decision

. . . or forced to, depending on your level of cynicism.

Nuisance, Kotex, and Inslee leaned on that new-age "prohibition" as hard as they could.

When you have ties to the folks "serving" the homeless community (w/ ~10% of their tax-funded grants) . . . never mind, I'm sure there was no grift, graft, or fuckery going on

 

[Outahand]

East Bay cities used to have their cops put all the bums on the night's last BART train headed to SF

Brilliant!

 

[Outahand]

This is a good time to remind everyone that Gavin's current wife fucked Harvey Weinstein for a job. When she tried to sue him over it, the jury unanimously found she thoroughly enjoyed it.

 

[gt1guy]

Some light reading on the subject. The powers that be got woke and tried to fix the problem in the 1970s, seems to me it was working fine.

Subsidized housing in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Public Works Administration (PWA) Housing Division 1933​

Housing Act of 1937​

Housing Act of 1949​

Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965​

Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968​

Experimental Housing Allowance Program 1970​

Housing and Community Development Act of 1974​

National Affordable Housing Act 1990​

HOPE VI 1992
Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act 1998


None of that stuff was to help............................it was to buy votes.

I personally think enough tax payer money has been spent in the last 91 years on the subject.

It hasn't fixed the problem and it never will. There are more people not even willing to work now than there have ever been. Add in that just about anyone can get welfare for any reason now days and you have the perfect storm of shit bags living out of OUR wallets. Ghetto rats are having babies just to get a bigger check.

I'm all for a helping hand. But it needs limits, hard limits.

Newscum is cleaning up so it can't be used as ammo by the R's and doesn't make Kackels look like the piece of shit that she is. That's my take on why he's doing it.

 

[ExWrench]

This is a good time to remind everyone that Gavin's current wife fucked Harvey Weinstein for a job. When she tried to sue him over it, the jury unanimously found she thoroughly enjoyed it.

Newscum is cleaning up so it can't be used as ammo by the R's and doesn't make Kackels look like the piece of shit that she is.

Those truths are inconvenient and will therefore be labeled "misinformation" by the same MSM that is actively scrubbing references to Kamelto being the "border czar" because the facts of her abject failure in that position is similarly inconvenient to the puppets of the globalist masters.

On a related note: Oceana has always been at war with Eurasia . . .

 

[subybaja]

This is a good time to remind everyone that Gavin's current wife fucked Harvey Weinstein for a job. When she tried to sue him over it, the jury unanimously found she thoroughly enjoyed it.

Jennifer Siebel Newsom asked Harvey Weinstein for sex scandal advice 2 years after alleged rape

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, emailed Harvey Weinstein seeking help in handling a sex scandal involving her husband — two years after she says the film producer…

nypost.com

 

[MigGunslinger]

The Governor's order is not binding or actionable it simply advises local and city governments to clean up the camps. Some already have been after the Supreme court decision. If the local government was inclined to, they will. If they were not, they won't.

The way to prevent encampments is to bust them up constantly, keep these people moving use light and noise to prevent them from sleeping. It is easier to live off of petty theft and government handouts than getting clean and being productive in California. As long as that is the case this will be a problem.

I have said it in a hundred threads on here. This is not a housing problem. Even if we provided free housing with no strings attached there would be disease, rape, murder, and fires rampant wherever they were put and then we would be liable for that as well. The people who live in these camps are filthy and drug addled into insanity. They are not good people who fell on hard times, they are bad people who fell on easy times, we either stop coddling them or we just look on in horror as they multiply.

If you have never seen and smelled what hundreds of shuffling meth zombies living in close proximity is like then count yourself lucky.

 

[Mikel]

Public Works Administration (PWA) Housing Division 1933​

Housing Act of 1937​

Housing Act of 1949​

Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965​

Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968​

Experimental Housing Allowance Program 1970​

Housing and Community Development Act of 1974​

National Affordable Housing Act 1990​

HOPE VI 1992
Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act 1998


None of that stuff was to help............................it was to buy votes.

I personally think enough tax payer money has been spent in the last 91 years on the subject.

It hasn't fixed the problem and it never will. There are more people not even willing to work now than there have ever been. Add in that just about anyone can get welfare for any reason now days and you have the perfect storm of shit bags living out of OUR wallets. Ghetto rats are having babies just to get a bigger check.

I'm all for a helping hand. But it needs limits, hard limits.

Newscum is cleaning up so it can't be used as ammo by the R's and doesn't make Kackels look like the piece of shit that she is. That's my take on why he's doing it.

How many problems has throwing taxpayer money at it fixed?

 

[FJC11]

Bus them to Mehico, turn about seems fair.

 

[MigGunslinger]

For you Californians, This proposition overturns the worst parts of Prop 47 and will be on the ballot this year:

It forces mandatory treatment for certain drug crimes and also sets new, lower, limits for felony theft.

Read it and decide for yourself but Prop 47 was an obvious fail and Prop 36 will overturn most of that.

California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024)

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

Let me know if you guys find anything objectionable. This was mostly funded by large retailers like Walmart etc. I actually don't find that bad because they have a lot of skin in the game.

Oh and Newsom is 100% against it if that helps sway you

 

[ROCKTACO]

So, my question is, if he has the homeless encampments torn down, where are all the homeless people going to stay at then?

Jail, like the "old" days?

 

[KarlVP]

The Governor's order is not binding or actionable it simply advises local and city governments to clean up the camps. Some already have been after the Supreme court decision. If the local government was inclined to, they will. If they were not, they won't.

The way to prevent encampments is to bust them up constantly, keep these people moving use light and noise to prevent them from sleeping. It is easier to live off of petty theft and government handouts than getting clean and being productive in California. As long as that is the case this will be a problem.

I have said it in a hundred threads on here. This is not a housing problem. Even if we provided free housing with no strings attached there would be disease, rape, murder, and fires rampant wherever they were put and then we would be liable for that as well. The people who live in these camps are filthy and drug addled into insanity. They are not good people who fell on hard times, they are bad people who fell on easy times, we either stop coddling them or we just look on in horror as they multiply.

If you have never seen and smelled what hundreds of shuffling meth zombies living in close proximity is like then count yourself lucky.

We know it isn't a housing problem, but that is what it is being tagged as.

I know it's fiction but in the Star Trek story line, the eugenics wars that led to WWIII are frighteningly where our real life society is today.

In that story line, they round up homeless, and put them in a walled off "housing area" basically a nice prison. It is so overwhelmed with red tape and bullshit it makes it almost impossible to get out, even if you have good intentions and are a non drug user.

Why can't we make that in today's society? Buy an old hotel and when you find "homeless" they get a paddy wagon ride to the hotel. This hotel has rooms, and basic utilities. If you don't like it there tough shit. There is no police, there is no social services, you go there and you are on your own. If you don't want to live there find a place in society.

It should be scary and shitty to be "homeless", but we are handing these people everything they need. Either from the state or from good Samaritans.

Stop wasting resources on these people. Carve out an area for them and if they aren't following the rules of society, drop 'em off in that area.

 

[ROCKTACO]

This will accelerate the growth of squatting in private buildings, where the tax paying citizens aren’t allowed to evict like the State can. Private holdings will lose all value, taxes will not be paid, State will confiscate and tax auction to, you guessed it, Pelosi-connected entities.

Shit, this is actually plausible. This is rampant in NYC. Do you think all these phentnol addicct are capable of it?.
Personally I'm not to worried about such activities where I live, but city dwellers be warned. Plus, mini x.

 

[ExWrench]

We know it isn't a housing problem, but that is what it is being tagged as.

. . . by the same commie fucks that want to cancel the term "homeless" and substitute it with "the unsheltered" . . . with the socialist implication that "we" must shelter them

 

[subybaja]

Anchorage has Fire Island out in the inlet. It's infested with windmills now (which the power company charges a surtax for), but it would make a fabulous drunk tank. Airdrop MREs and machetes every few weeks, and let the problem work itself out.

Maybe install cameras and make a reality show of it, narrated by AI Attenborough.

 

[ExWrench]

Semi-related, I just remembered a joke from ~30 years ago:

Q: What's the best part about dating a homeless chick?​

​

A: At the end of the night, you can drop her off anywhere.​

 

[MigGunslinger]

It should be scary and shitty to be "homeless", but we are handing these people everything they need. Either from the state or from good Samaritans.

Stop wasting resources on these people. Carve out an area for them and if they aren't following the rules of society, drop 'em off in that area.

I 100% agree with the first part.

The second part can't be done, rounding people up and putting them in camps has bad optics for some reason You pick them off one by one and perform mandatory treatment. Get them clean for a month and see if there is still a human underneath.

No, we need a reduction in numbers and to stop concentrating them into small armies with shitty state and local policies. There will always be homeless or "hobos" that are misanthropic and wander in society. We can deal with a small number of them scattered around.

 

[ExWrench]

That^. And for the love of God, stop incentivizing homelessness - SF is a great example of making it a ~good living. Subsidized subsistence shouldn't be plush, it should be subsistence - same as welfare, nobody should be on it by choice; rather, out of dire necessity.

 

[DannyK]

Give each of them 3 solid chances to get their shit together. After that you are sent to machete island.

 

[fordguy]

They just had a story here about a lady they asked to stop providing a homeless group with fresh drinking water.

Basically told her, thanks, but it's our job you are not authorized.

EDIT: Story

Loading…

www.ktvu.com

so.. which side of that are you on?