What's new
By:
Filters

Fresh thread on Election Fraud and Legal action

they are going to be more blatant about it this time, because calling anyone who opposed them last time a lunatic and democracy hater worked. they even sentenced some dudes to 15 years in prison for walking around in the capital building after being escorted in by the cops.

its going to be stolen again. right in front of your eyes. but they wont make the same mistakes as last time. no ruby freemans and no vids of covering windows and kicking people out.

also, now that they know that phone GPS and cell tower data was used to track ballot harvesters to the drop boxes, everyone gets farraday cage bags along with their burner phones when they make the 20-30 drop box visits.

its not that hard.
 
MattS said:
^ finally got to watch that. Kinda crazy if it's all true. If they can prove that one guy is leading that many people to fraud they need to go after him HARD.
Click to expand...
said it before and I'll say it again. If I was in the DNC, I'd demand a forensic audit across the states to prove there was no fraud... just to flip off the GOP.

The video suggests the real reason people fight ID requirements is to make elections easier to manipulate.
 
the conservative atheist said:
The very fact that they had to come out and say it was "the most secure election in history" tells you something went down .
Click to expand...
Plus they said it the day after the steal. No way they could have possibly known that quick. Barr included. Even though he knew it was bullshit.
 
Texas97 said:
they are going to be more blatant about it this time, because calling anyone who opposed them last time a lunatic and democracy hater worked. they even sentenced some dudes to 15 years in prison for walking around in the capital building after being escorted in by the cops.

its going to be stolen again. right in front of your eyes. but they wont make the same mistakes as last time. no ruby freemans and no vids of covering windows and kicking people out.

also, now that they know that phone GPS and cell tower data was used to track ballot harvesters to the drop boxes, everyone gets farraday cage bags along with their burner phones when they make the 20-30 drop box visits.

its not that hard.
Click to expand...
This.......
 
Texas97 said:
they are going to be more blatant about it this time, because calling anyone who opposed them last time a lunatic and democracy hater worked. they even sentenced some dudes to 15 years in prison for walking around in the capital building after being escorted in by the cops.

its going to be stolen again. right in front of your eyes. but they wont make the same mistakes as last time. no ruby freemans and no vids of covering windows and kicking people out.

also, now that they know that phone GPS and cell tower data was used to track ballot harvesters to the drop boxes, everyone gets farraday cage bags along with their burner phones when they make the 20-30 drop box visits.

its not that hard.
Click to expand...
Considering the lack of consequences, I can't think of a single reason why they wouldn't/wont.

Until real blood flows, this is the new norm. Not some Jan 6th bullshit protest as we've seen exactly what that will result in.
 
I have yet to see a single source showing the 50 states and their voting rules, requirements, etc especially pertaining to voter identification and or validation. In the new age, the verification of absentee ballots by voter roster comparison and signature on the mail in or drop in envelope as in California.

The thousands of "spike" ballots in Michigan for example. Are, were they vetted against anything ?
 
Splib said:
I have yet to see a single source showing the 50 states and their voting rules, requirements, etc especially pertaining to voter identification and or validation. In the new age, the verification of absentee ballots by voter roster comparison and signature on the mail in or drop in envelope as in California.

The thousands of "spike" ballots in Michigan for example. Are, were they vetted against anything ?
Click to expand...
No, they are supposed to be vetted at the very least against the signature on the voter registration. But that's so subjective it really isn't a barrier to fraud at all.
 
Juztyn00 said:
No, they are supposed to be vetted at the very least against the signature on the voter registration. But that's so subjective it really isn't a barrier to fraud at all.
Click to expand...

Yes. Not what I posted though. You are saying that sig comparo is universal throughout the entire USA ? I dont think you are. Have you seen an info source with state by state quals as I asked ? I dont think some states bother, especially the new ones that illegally adopted "changed" rules to accommodate the Wuhan.
 
the conservative atheist said:
And the SCOTUS wouldn't even hear the case.
Click to expand...
Can't say that I blame them.
I feel they were basically telling the States to fix their own shit.
Doesn't mean it's dead with them (SC), just that they're not always gonna be the Parent.
Sadly, the States haven't done shit.
 
nahmus said:
General question. If SCOTUS refuses to hear a case is that the end? No more appeals? it's just dead?
Click to expand...
Yes. Unless the same topic is brought up through another case, OR there ends up being conflicting opinions in different federal jurisdictions. Then, and maybe only then will it be heard.
 
nahmus said:
General question. If SCOTUS refuses to hear a case is that the end? No more appeals? it's just dead?
Click to expand...

Pony_Driver said:
Yes. Unless the same topic is brought up through another case, OR there ends up being conflicting opinions in different federal jurisdictions. Then, and maybe only then will it be heard.
Click to expand...

In fairness to the SC, it is the states problem. The only case that I know of that they should have ruled on was in Pennsylvania. There the Pennsylvanian SC illegally ruled in there own state. The fed SC should have stepped in and set them straight. As I understand it, it was “tabled” while they ruled on the bigger multi-state case. They should have come back and slapped there hands by now.
 
I think everyone may be over-reacting. I am sure we will have elections which are just as viable and honest as other countries.

NK, Russia, China are a few that come to mind.
 
RedX said:
I think everyone may be over-reacting. I am sure we will have elections which are just as viable and honest as other countries.

NK, Russia, China are a few that come to mind.
Click to expand...
And didn't we (the US) require those in Iraq to dip their finger in blue ink when they voted?
 
Bogus One said:
I had to give a thumb print when I first started voting.
Click to expand...

Ambiguous sentence is ambiguous. Where and when was this ? You dont state you had to give a thumb print to be able to vote. Please explain. :beer:
 
Splib said:
Ambiguous sentence is ambiguous. Where and when was this ? You dont state you had to give a thumb print to be able to vote. Please explain. :beer:
Click to expand...
1984 (?)
CA
You put your thumbprint on the voter role next to your name
Your black thumb was the "I Voted" sticker of the day
 
Ah. Sounds like your thumb was marked, kind of a primitive virtual signal. Different than the impression I got from your post that your thumb print was taken, recorded, etc. I dont recall that, but that's on my weak brain. I recall the chads and pen fill on the ballots. Never had a problem or issue when they looked me up at the voting place and handed me a ballot. I went absentee mail sometime in the late 90's after I missed a vote due to being out of town for work.
 
Bogus One said:
1984 (?)
CA
You put your thumbprint on the voter role next to your name
Your black thumb was the "I Voted" sticker of the day
Click to expand...
Splib said:
Ah. Sounds like your thumb was marked, kind of a primitive virtual signal. Different than the impression I got from your post that your thumb print was taken, recorded, etc. I dont recall that, but that's on my weak brain. I recall the chads and pen fill on the ballots. Never had a problem or issue when they looked me up at the voting place and handed me a ballot. I went absentee mail sometime in the late 90's after I missed a vote due to being out of town for work.
Click to expand...
Huh? :confused:

Seems like putting your thumbprint on the voter role after you vote is traceable proof that you were actually the person voting.
 
I dont really know anything about it or remember doing it even though I voted many times. Back in 1984 CA did not have any way to efficiently or effectively match a random thumb print with any data base that they did not have. Joe blow could leave a thumb print where bgaidan voted. (Edit: I dont remember the ID check. Maybe Bogus or another CA voter can inform) There wasnt even an internet then really. So, your thumb print could be traceable in theory, on a forensic level but not a practical one, right ? I doubt such a thumbprint would be useful until sometime later with the advent of tech and internet. I am thinking of the times I voted at the school gymnasium with the line outside and the little old ladies and booths and the screens which is what we did back in 1984.
 
Last edited:
bgaidan said:
Huh? :confused:

Seems like putting your thumbprint on the voter role after you vote is traceable proof that you were actually the person voting.
Click to expand...
That's why it was done, I was told.
Imagine how fucking RACIST that would be today

:homer:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh