What's new

Fresh thread on Election Fraud and Legal action

I'm still in the process of getting my gun permit but I have a ton of crossbow bolts... for target practice. Recently got another crossbow from a friend of mine who is moving and just had it sitting in his basement.
 
I'm still in the process of getting my gun permit but I have a ton of crossbow bolts... for target practice. Recently got another crossbow from a friend of mine who is moving and just had it sitting in his basement.

I love that gurgling noise coming from Homeslice in Deliverance when he gets an arrow in the neck :mr-t:
 

A Constitutional Crisis Is Brewing in Pennsylvania Over Mail-In Ballots​

By Bonchie |

With just two weeks left before the mid-terms, Pennsylvania has become ground zero, with perhaps the most hotly contested and important US senate race in the nation occurring. But while both sides are eagerly attempting to garner as many votes as possible, a major constitutional crisis is brewing that almost no one is talking about.



As RedState previously reported, the Supreme Court vacated a state court decision requiring Pennsylvania to count un-dated mail-in ballots. The plain letter of the law requires that a mail-in ballot must be filled, signed, and dated in order to be counted. Despite that, Democrat state officials have pledged to defy the law, giving guidance to counties that they not only should un-dated ballots be counted, but they aren’t even required to be sequestered pending further legal action.

Their reasoning? That voters shouldn’t be disenfranchised based on a “technical violation.”

These ballots have been subject to years of litigation in Pennsylvania — much of it highly partisan. Republicans officials and politicians have generally argued that undated mail ballots do not comply with state law and should be thrown out. Democrats have countered that a minor technical violation should not disenfranchise a voter, and pushed for the ballots to be counted. Democratic voters have been more likely to vote by mail in recent years.
Who gets to decide what “technical violations” can be ignored? That would seem to be a dangerous road to go down in regards to simply shunning the law based on an arbitrary judgment by a partisan state official. Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting law isn’t ambiguous. It pointedly says that ballots must be dated to be counted.

It’s incredibly revealing (and somewhat shocking) that Democrats in the state don’t even try to pretend they have a real legal case. Instead, they simply claim that a technical violation of the law shouldn’t matter, which is an emotional argument if anything.


They make their claim by suggesting the existence of a legal gray area based on a non-binding ruling delivered by a single judge.

Joshua Voss, an attorney who frequently argues election cases on Republicans’ behalf, said he thinks Chapman’s new guidance is legally shaky.
Chapman’s guidance is based on May Commonwealth Court decisions made by a Republican judge. But the rulings are unpublished, meaning they are considered “persuasive” but not binding. This means that while courts can refer to these decisions in future mail ballot cases, they don’t have to.
The Wolf administration basing guidance on an “unpublished single-judge opinion,” Voss said, is “a remarkable position.”
That’s led to Republicans filing yet another lawsuit in an attempt to see the law enforced while counties splinter in different directions. Right now, five counties have voluntarily decided to separate off the un-dated ballots, though they will still be counted on election night so as to not defy the state’s guidance.

Ask yourself this, though. What happens when Republicans win the lawsuit and Pennsylvania’s defiance of the Supreme Court is struck down? With so many counties, including the bluest ones, having already counted and destroyed the un-dated ballots, there will be no way to right whatever wrongs occurred. That’s going to set off a firestorm of discussion over whether the election was stolen, assuming Democrats end up victorious, and that discussion would be completely justified.


On the other hand, what if Republicans win the night? Do they continue to push the ballot issue, running the risk of reversing their gains if those ballots actually helped them over the finish line? It’s an interesting question, and I bet the GOP itself doesn’t have an answer yet as to how it would handle such a situation.

Regardless, these are not issues that should exist. It is disturbing that Democrat officials in Pennsylvania would so brazenly violate the law, essentially trying to run out the clock on the court system. If un-dated ballots end up being counted and the election is close on November 8th, the nation will be staring at a constitutional crisis. The courts must step in and put a stop to this before things get any further.
 
Have a few mags laying around for when they try and burn your neighborhood?
I'm just gonna reiterate, when blm and antifa were breaking windows in downtown Tucson (fuck downtown Tucson, it's hippies and gov employees) I didn't care. When they said they were gonna head to the suburbs, my only concern was figuring out how to keep my cooler from sliding off the roof:laughing:
 
I'm just gonna reiterate, when blm and antifa were breaking windows in downtown Tucson (fuck downtown Tucson, it's hippies and gov employees) I didn't care. When they said they were gonna head to the suburbs, my only concern was figuring out how to keep my cooler from sliding off the roof:laughing:
I think that narrative is changing the last couple of years... I am seeing more and more Democrats taking the plunge into gun ownership. I'm fine with that btw... the more the merrier. An armed society is a polite society and all that.
 
I'm just gonna reiterate, when blm and antifa were breaking windows in downtown Tucson (fuck downtown Tucson, it's hippies and gov employees) I didn't care. When they said they were gonna head to the suburbs, my only concern was figuring out how to keep my cooler from sliding off the roof:laughing:
They will be very tired by the time they get to me. About 120 miles every direction of hillbillies and rednecks. Oh well probably prder a few pizzas and see if there is any live music down in town that night. :lmao:
 
I’m going to vote, but I know many who have given up. In Pennsylvania I predict a Shapiro/Fetterman win.
 
I will vote (and am grateful that we can).....but realistically, I don't have a lot of faith anymore in the validity of the process and outcomes.
 
So with the mid terms coming up here is a list of repugs at least partially backs by Bill the Vaccine Gates.
71B30996-D220-434F-A279-81C65C3AEA7E.png
 
I'm just gonna reiterate, when blm and antifa were breaking windows in downtown Tucson (fuck downtown Tucson, it's hippies and gov employees) I didn't care. When they said they were gonna head to the suburbs, my only concern was figuring out how to keep my cooler from sliding off the roof:laughing:
The 1" foam pads sold as hunting "seats" work really well for that. Just lay em on the roof and set the cooler on em. No slidy
 
So with the mid terms coming up here is a list of repugs at least partially backs by Bill the Vaccine Gates.

I would encourage voters to base their selection on the voting record of the candidate, not some meme by "Baby" :shaking::shaking::shaking:

Fish, who do you think created that piece of art ?
 
I would encourage voters to base their selection on the voting record of the candidate, not some meme by "Baby" :shaking::shaking::shaking:

Fish, who do you think created that piece of art ?
Well I check my state reps that were on there and they were accurate. Have you checked yours? We already busted one of them out, Jamie Buttler. She was a jan 6 er. And it came from telegram. I just took a quick screen shot. And if your dumb enough to vote solely based on a information sheet from the internet you haven’t verified then your fucking stupid. But also if you dismiss stuff that may contradict your beliefs because you dont want to have your feelings hurt then your fucking stupid also.

As evidence. Jamie Buttler has years of a solid voting record. She pipes up about Jan 6 saying it was an insurrection get negative feed back and then got quiet trying to keep her job but not recant her statement. A bit of research shows that she is heavily funded by people her constituents hate but she never talks about that at all.

Are you that stupid that you cant tell the difference between a meme and a spread sheet. :shaking::shaking::shaking:
 
Cheesus K Rhist mister. You posted a cartoon that advocates removing a third of the Republican voting US senate. Based on some $ they received. Not on what they did, do or will do.

Not going to comment on the rest of your speech. It speaks for itself.

You know very little about my beliefs except - giz

Glad you figured out yer Butler service :flipoff2:
 
Cheesus K Rhist mister. You posted a cartoon that advocates removing a third of the Republican voting US senate. Based on some $ they received. Not on what they did, do or will do.

Not going to comment on the rest of your speech. It speaks for itself.

You know very little about my beliefs except - giz

Glad you figured out yer Butler service :flipoff2:
So you attack then hide. Way to be bro:shaking::shaking::shaking:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
I'm not sure about the rest, but the 2 Texas guys most certainly need to go.

Mitt Romney

The rest of that fish rant was, well, rant like :eek:

Many many donors give to both parties or to opposing candidates. Not saying I back Gates, just that cartoon is cartoon.
 
Top Back Refresh