What's new
By:
Filters

Follow the Science LMAO

Splib said:
If you say so. The cultural revoultion was science based ? :lmao:

Stalin's purges and deliberate famine of the Ukraine was science based ? :lmao:

You and Motor can re-write a shit load of scholarly literature, be sure to credit your YouTube sources or make up new ones :lmao:
Click to expand...
Cultural revolution was all about science destroying the 4 Olds. Religiong and superstition among then

Wtf are you smoking?
 
Changes to cropping, waterway management, resource allocation was all "science" based.

Edit: which exacerbated famine and killed millions

Same as the current Islam re education and feeding them only pork, science over religion
 
Neither you nor I are scholars or anywhere near experts on Chinese history. Like motor, I cant fathom how and why you link unrelated and divergant arguments that are simply incorrect. The thread is about acaddeic fraud and a mney get rich scheme. That was clouded by statements that science always corrupts like the Nazis. Smoking ? And then in reposnse to massive extermiinations of Stalin and Mao, you said -

"Changes to cropping, waterway management, resource allocation was all "science" based."

Never mentioned Stalin or the Khemer Rouge.........

WRONG Those are cultural values, not science based. Or at least not acadenic science like what I meant. Mao got rid of his opposition and he didn't need or use any scientific excuse to justify it. He needed bullets and masses of ignorant hungary angry peasant mobs. Redistributing some irriagation water based on gravity is not really science, is it ? You are bending and slanting history to fit some unrelated agenda. The Red Book. It was a bloody power struggle and redistribution and not using "science" to justify it. If by science you mean they used mathematics in surveying for water ditches then yeah, sure, but as a propoganda tool to feed the mob, no. :shaking:

Smoking ?? :lmao:

Did you read the Red book or the more recent manifesto establishing the CCP steps to world domination by 2040 or ? I havent but I would like to hear your take on that if you have. Would be interesting to hear from a Chinese national on this. My contacts are gone now.. . . . ..
 
Provience said:
Cultural revolution was all about science destroying the 4 Olds. Religiong and superstition among then

Wtf are you smoking?
Click to expand...
He’s dumb as shit. Like many many dumb people, he’s somehow arrogant about his intelligence.

I think he also admitted to being a geologist or something like it, which fits, based on my experience. A career spent in pretending to know the unknowable often seems to make people forget where their actual knowledge limits are.
 
Splib said:
Neither you nor I are scholars or anywhere near experts on Chinese history. Like motor, I cant fathom how and why you link unrelated and divergant arguments that are simply incorrect. The thread is about acaddeic fraud and a mney get rich scheme. That was clouded by statements that science always corrupts like the Nazis. Smoking ? And then in reposnse to massive extermiinations of Stalin and Mao, you said -

"Changes to cropping, waterway management, resource allocation was all "science" based."

Never mentioned Stalin or the Khemer Rouge.........

WRONG Those are cultural values, not science based. Or at least not acadenic science like what I meant. Mao got rid of his opposition and he didn't need or use any scientific excuse to justify it. He needed bullets and masses of ignorant hungary angry peasant mobs. Redistributing some irriagation water based on gravity is not really science, is it ? You are bending and slanting history to fit some unrelated agenda. The Red Book. It was a bloody power struggle and redistribution and not using "science" to justify it. If by science you mean they used mathematics in surveying for water ditches then yeah, sure, but as a propoganda tool to feed the mob, no. :shaking:

Smoking ?? :lmao:

Did you read the Red book or the more recent manifesto establishing the CCP steps to world domination by 2040 or ? I havent but I would like to hear your take on that if you have. Would be interesting to hear from a Chinese national on this. My contacts are gone now.. . . . ..
Click to expand...
:shaking:
 
OHV Wildcat said:
He’s dumb as shit. Like many many dumb people, he’s somehow arrogant about his intelligence.

I think he also admitted to being a geologist or something like it, which fits, based on my experience. A career spent in pretending to know the unknowable often seems to make people forget where their actual knowledge limits are.
Click to expand...

Not worth responding to. I thought you are the genius that stated Cretaceous or Permian DNA was used in petroleum exploration. After I pointed out how retarded that is you went away. Only to pop up here with personal attacks and more complete idiocy. I never “admitted “ to being a geologist I stated that I am one. Huge difference. I don’t know what you do or why you are so obviously obnoxious. Please enlighten us. And elaborate on your qualifications to feebly try and insult qualified professionals. And take the unproven geology that was used when you fill up with petroleum or sheath up your Triojan when you pull it out of your cousins asshole. :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh