What's new

Climate Change fear: the new Religion

I can't remember which play right said it, I have heard the recording. He said that every 5 years everyone should have to justify their continued exitance in the betterment of society! I don't know about you but that is not the world I want to live in! :mad3:
how about every 5 years you have to show how you haven't been ripping the fabric of the world apart (pedophiles, general dickhead stuff, ripping off old people, priests raping kids, people in positions of trust who betray that trust, con artists) start at the bottom.
 
how about every 5 years you have to show how you haven't been ripping the fabric of the world apart (pedophiles, general dickhead stuff, ripping off old people, priests raping kids, people in positions of trust who betray that trust, con artists) start at the bottom.
And who do you show this to every 5 years? And who do they show theirs too? :confused:
 
Was the 1906 Asheville floods caused by human induced climate change?
How about the Galveston 1900 hurricane that killed 8k?

 
Climate meme dump, use as you see fit.

1731419511462.png
 
I don’t remember what podcast I was listening to yesterday but they pointed out that climate shit wasn’t on the front of the Democrat agenda this election cycle. They focused on other things and kind of let that slip quietly down the list
 
Scientific American was one of about mags I subscribed to from the late 1970's until about 2001. It is an Iconic source of trusted information for many for GENERATIONS ....... I let my subscription lapse after my son was born and I concentrated on real shit, etc. Stumbled across a post on another forum, in the "Environmental" section where it was stated that SciAm no longer printed or released anything that was not Pro Climate hysteria. I couldn't believe that. So I read as much as I could without coughing up $ to subscribe and sure as shit, an anti factual bias puke towing the shouting environmental bullshit had taken over. I read that they would not publish any divergent facts or submittals. This kunt is typical. I doubt that the mag or website or whatever will ever be taken seriously again. I read Tanya Atwater's SciAm plate tectonics article at a time the theory was not taught at the University level. The mage had creed and clout at that time.


A quick lazy sirch was unable to turn up her article in SciAm but here is another synopsis . .. . .

 
Top Back Refresh