What's new
By:
Filters

Climate Change fear: the new Religion

Icono

Icono

I, Coño
Joined
May 21, 2020
Member Number
858
Messages
517
Starting this thread to accumulate information and point out the social manipulators that promulgate fear instead of science and facts.


This has been going on even before the Covid "threat".

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's start here:


These people are FUCKING insane!


The UN Discusses Darkening The Skies to Combat Climate Change

​

The UN Discusses Darkening The Skies to Combat Climate Change​

Will Bill Gates succeed with his new plan?​

ges%2F673d33d2-5564-4354-b76e-34394945a579_764x697.jpg
A new report from the UN was just published. It proposes and discusses ways to cool our planet by restricting sunlight and darkening our skies.
ges%2F37a7357d-404f-4d24-855a-c68a7256fcc0_950x852.jpg

Source: UNEP Document
Click to expand...

What is this about? Why block sunlight, of all things? Let me explain.

The UN is worried about climate change. As the efforts to reduce CO2 emissions are faltering, the UN is looking for more ways to cool the Earth. The UNEP’s report details ideas called “Solar Radiation Modification,” the gist of which is to reflect sunlight and prevent it from heating the surface of our planet.

Here are the main ideas that the UN will consider:

  • Injecting reflective nanoparticles/sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere (stratospheric aerosol injection)
  • Brightening of low clouds over the ocean by seeding ocean clouds with submicron salt particles
  • Using space mirrors, that is, many giant mirrors launched into outer space to reflect sunlight.
The UN explains that should the “global stakeholders” decide to proceed, the skies could be darkened within only a few years:

SRM is the only option that could cool the planet within years. To be effective at limiting global warming, SRM would need to be maintained for several decades to centuries, depending on the pace of emissions reductions and carbon removal.
Click to expand...
The report does pay lip service to what is undeniable:

  • This is an untested planetary intervention
  • There could be disparate effects on certain regions
However, you and I can guess we should not expect a careful, conservative review of such proposals by the UN if the “Covid vaccine” experience is any guide.

This picture introduces us to the sky-dimming technology being considered:

es%2Ff83bed97-de72-494b-ab69-60e7d956d33f_1104x854.jpg

Source: UNEP Document
The report explains:

Major volcanic eruptions, which introduce large amounts of sulphate particles into the stratosphere, provide a natural analogue for SRM deployment (Figure 4). For example, the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption caused global annual-mean cooling of about 0.3–0.5°C in the following two years. An SAI deployment would inject aerosols continuously into the stratosphere. It is estimated that continuous injection rates of 8–16 Tg of sulphur dioxide (SO2) per year (approximately equivalent to the estimated injection amount of Mount Pinatubo in the single year of 1991) would reduce global mean temperature by 1°C. An operational SAI deployment could be scaled up to produce global cooling of 2–5°C, albeit with diminishing returns at higher rates of injections.
Click to expand...
You are probably not a chemist, and neither am I. However, sulfur dioxide was a free byproduct of coal and oil burning, emitted into the atmosphere until recent decades. Environmental activists and authorities concluded that sulfur dioxide was a pollutant gas contributing to the phenomenon of acid rain and causing significant health problems.

Having been assured that sulfur dioxide was bad for us, we spent billions of dollars eliminating it from coal and oil-burning emissions and building sulfur-capture technology to keep SO2 out of the atmosphere.

Now, it turns out that sulfur dioxide is good for us, and we need to spend even more untold billions to inject it into the atmosphere.

Does this sound stupid to you?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Rest of article:

I am sure, however, that investors will earn quite a bit of money from “sulfur dioxide atmospheric injections” right after making billions on “eliminating sulfur dioxide emissions” from coal-burning plants.

The UN document correctly indicates that volcanic eruptions sometimes fill the skies with ash or sulfur, dim the sun for years, and lead to measurable global cooling episodes. The example listed in the report is the above-mentioned Mt. Pinatubo eruption in 1991, which temporarily cooled our planet by 0.5 degrees C.

However, much darker pages of human history were associated with volcanoes causing catastrophic climate changes.

For example, in 1600, the eruption of the Huaynaputina in Peru caused famines in Europe and led to mass deaths.

In Russia, 1601-1603 brought the worst famine in the country's history, leading to the overthrow of the reigning tsar. Records from Switzerland, Latvia and Estonia record exceptionally cold winters in 1600-1602; in France, the 1601 wine harvest was late, and wine production collapsed in Germany and colonial Peru. In China, peach trees bloomed late, and Lake Suwa in Japan had one of its earliest freezing dates in 500 years.
Click to expand...
So, such global sun-dimming projects may indeed cause global cooling at the cost of poisoning the atmosphere, causing acid rain, and leading to the collapse of agriculture in several regions of the world.

In addition, blocked sunlight will prevent the uptake of CO2 by plants because converting CO2 into plant matter and oxygen needs sunlight:

s%2F03d8c4e8-faf8-4184-9d4b-0dadbb3edf7e_1024x1024.png

Source: Wikipedia Photosynthesis
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...c6d-ddf2-409d-8663-7c63c9d0334d_1084x823.jpeg
Source: Popular Mechanics
Imagine a hypothetical layperson named Charlie. Charlie is a reasonable, caring, intelligent, but not well-informed individual who has never heard of sky dimming before. Charlie has a friend named Igor, who reads a wide variety of news and uses mostly reliable sources, such as the UN’s official documents from the UNEP or news magazines such as Popular Mechanics.

If Igor informed Charlie that one of the richest men in the world had convinced the United Nations to seriously consider dimming the sky over the entire planet, injecting acid-rain-causing sulfur gas into the atmosphere, and potentially causing famines in some regions, Charlie would consider the messenger, Igor, a crazy conspiracy theorist.

It is not possible! Charlie would say. Take off your tinfoil hat Igor and get a life. That would be Charlie’s likely answer to such news. Our leading authorities, Charlie would assert, would certainly never consider forcing the entire world to implement such crazy ideas!

The problem is that these disturbing ideas are completely real. This is not even the first time reckless global plans were implemented with the UN backing.

Those same people just made the entire world take unproven Covid vaccines that saw no long-term testing and ended up not working.

Sharing news about these plans is, therefore, a challenge due to the inherent insanity of what the plans propose. I discussed such challenges before, also mentioning sky dimming.

Meanwhile, a path is being laid toward such proposals becoming a reality.

Bill Gates is not messing around. Will his sky-darkening plans come to fruition?

Somehow, the dimmed sunlight inhibiting CO2 sequestration (uptake), and lowering food production, does not bother the proponents of Solar Radiation Modification. And how would solar panels run without the sun?

These are not immediately-actionable plans yet. In some ways, the UN report is exploratory. Nobody is building giant sulfur-dioxide-injecting smokestacks or is launching mirrors into space, as of now.

However, the usual stakeholders, such as Bill Gates, are preparing the right conditions for this to happen:

es%2F740244ea-274b-466d-ae02-e92d48792bca_1280x720.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Some are sane and calling out the REAL drive behind "net Zero":

Half the World Faces Starvation Under Net Zero Policies, Say Two Top Climate Scientists – The Daily Sceptic

Excerpt:

Billions of people around the world face starvation if Net Zero policies ban the production of nitrogen fertiliser derived from fossil fuels. This is the stark warning from two top American scientists who say that eliminating fossil fuel-derived nitrogen fertilisers and pesticides “will result in about half the world’s population not having enough food to eat”. They add that eliminating Net Zero fertiliser will create “worldwide starvation”.


In a wide-ranging paper titled ‘Challenging ‘Net Zero’ with Science‘, Emeritus Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen of Princeton and MIT respectively, along with geologist Gregory Wrightstone, state that Net Zero – the global movement to eliminate fossil fuels and its emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases – to be “scientifically invalid and a threat to the lives of billions of people”.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
richard-lindzen-605592.jpg

1678181872901.jpeg




richard-lindzen-1386476.jpg
 
Last edited:
People have to have something to believe in. They have tried to destroy the Christian/Judio morale code, so now they have to come up with something to take it's place so the religion of Climate Change was born, with abortion as its sacrament and petroleum is their devil!
 
KarlVP said:
The Kepler telescope found ~300 earth like worlds within 1000 light years.

I'm moving to one of those.
Click to expand...
I don't know from my reading os SciFi it could be a crap shoot as to weather it could support human life or not
 
If you burned every resource on earth at once it would make a negligible (less than 1 degree) effect on the climate short term and zero impact long term (not factoring the lack of plants to convert co2 to o2 however that’s a different complicated subject)

Once large volcano eruption does more to affect it than that too. I can’t remember where the paper is that went through this and don’t have time to search for it but it’s out there. Volcanic ash is “glass” and very reflective too so it has an advantage.

The VOC regulations DID affect the ozone however. That is proven. But other countries don’t follow the rules so it’s still an issue just smaller.

Climate “change” has NOT even come close to the predicted models. Every year the curve slides a year farther out.

*I studied in graduate level Climatology and PaleoClimate doing my BS in college with a leading climatology researchers. It was so crazy how they just believe it.

Lastly, if anyone truly believes in climate change then they need to abstain from every modern conveniences and live in a teepee or mud hut and only eat vegetation and uncooked meat. No fire for warmth etc. Not fly around in their Gulf Stream.
 
Sulfur dioxide at very high altitude may be beneficial, at low altitude where it's coming out of coal plants it's clearly not.

Same with ozone. Ground level bad, high altitude beneficial. Problem is the atmosphere stratifies so what's released at ground level may take forever to make it up to high altitude.

Your article simplifies it too far to the detriment of the authors argument.
 
Kyle said:
Lastly, if anyone truly believes in climate change then they need to abstain from every modern conveniences and live in a teepee or mud hut and only eat vegetation and uncooked meat. No fire for warmth etc. Not fly around in their Gulf Stream.
Click to expand...
I can agree with a lot of what you state, but the climate is changing...always has and always will.

the only debate is how much humans effect that change if any.
 
Where was it, Switzerland? They found a mine no one knew about untill a glacier had melted back and exposed it. Proving that climate is always changing
 
Last edited:
Kyle said:
If you burned every resource on earth at once it would make a negligible (less than 1 degree) effect on the climate short term and zero impact long term (not factoring the lack of plants to convert co2 to o2 however that’s a different complicated subject)

Once large volcano eruption does more to affect it than that too. I can’t remember where the paper is that went through this and don’t have time to search for it but it’s out there. Volcanic ash is “glass” and very reflective too so it has an advantage.

The VOC regulations DID affect the ozone however. That is proven. But other countries don’t follow the rules so it’s still an issue just smaller.

Climate “change” has NOT even come close to the predicted models. Every year the curve slides a year farther out.

*I studied in graduate level Climatology and PaleoClimate doing my BS in college with a leading climatology researchers. It was so crazy how they just believe it.

Lastly, if anyone truly believes in climate change then they need to abstain from every modern conveniences and live in a teepee or mud hut and only eat vegetation and uncooked meat. No fire for warmth etc. Not fly around in their Gulf Stream.
Click to expand...
I thought someone figured out that the hole in the ozone was largely attributed to the Manhattan project letting a bunch of fluorines go during uranium enrichment when they had no clue what harm it would do?
Not saying CFCs are great, just that it wasn’t the sole contributor.
 
should rename it
Sheelpe Study:lmao:
Snowflakes and virtue signalers:flipoff:
 
Volcanic ash is glass. Yes. No such thing as "climate change" because for that to be factual, there would have to be climate stagnation. Climate is dynamic, by definition it is not constant. Flatline normalcy is a human construct and fantasy. There have been HUGE sudden almost instant temperature fluctuations that have had devastating effects and results on the planets surface.

Humans being humans, we have money, power and climate change.
 
"The new religion"

LOL, hasn't this been a religion for decades now?

If they were sincerely worried about it then they would go after the biggest polluter of them all, China, but we can't talk about that, can we? Fuck China
 
Chy Nah has openied hundreds of new coal plants over the last decade and since the Kyoto protocals that they signed. They have many more on the way. Better than Russian NG :lmao:

Fuck, their mercury from coal has contaminated and left residual levels in Mountain Lions, the apex predator of the California coast range near Santa Cruz, CA.
 
So, the best thing to do would be to plant more plants and trees?

Is that not what Arbor Day is for?
 
Maybe I'll start daily driving the diesel... Help out the plants as much as possible before they darken the skies and plunge us into a real life version of the Matrix's 2nd Renaissance... With or without the killer machines (probably with.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh