What's new

Biden to announce widespread amnesty plan for illegal immigrants

Landslide

Red Skull Member
Joined
May 20, 2020
Member Number
422
Messages
1,669
Boom… here it is!

Biden to announce widespread amnesty plan for illegal immigrants​


The Center Square ) – President Joe Biden is expected to announce a new plan on Tuesday that will fast track a path to citizenship for foreign nationals who’ve been living in the country illegally for more than 10 years and married a U.S. citizen. He also plans to expand protections for DACA recipients, according to several reports.

“Officials inside the White House and at the Department of Homeland Security have been studying a range of proposals to provide work permits or deportation relief for millions of undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked in the U.S. for a long time,” The Wall Street Journal first reported. “They have zeroed in on the population of mixed-status families, where typically the children and one parent are U.S. citizens, because they believe that demographic is the most compelling, according to administration officials and advocates who have spoken with them.”

One way to do this would be to implement another parole policy called “parole in place,” enabling illegal foreign national spouses of U.S. citizens to obtain green cards and U.S. citizenship. They would also receive work permits and deportation protections, according to several reports on Monday.

Advocates in support of providing amnesty estimate there are more than one million spouses who could apply to the new parole program, the Journal reported.

Biden’s proposal is “one of the largest immigration relief programs in recent history,” CBS News reported.

He’s expected to make the announcement at the White House with several officials on the 12th-year anniversary of former President Barack Obama creating by executive order the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA). DACA shielded children from deportation who were brought into the country illegally by their parents and has been in litigation for 12 years. A federal judge has twice ruled that the program is illegal. The most recent ruling was in a multi-state lawsuit led by Texas to end DACA once and for all, The Center Square reported. The case is expected to ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The president is also expected to announce an expanded program for DACA recipients to “streamline the process” for them “and other undocumented immigrants to request waivers that would make it easier for them to obtain temporary visas, such as H-1B visas for high-skilled workers,” CBS News reported.

Numerous reports suggest between 700,000 and 800,000 people living in the U.S. are DACA recipients. The Los Angeles Times reports there are 578,680 DACA recipients on record with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services as of March 2023.

After announcing earlier this month he was limiting asylum claims, the president is now proposing a measure to ensure those in the country illegally aren’t deported. Both announcements made five months before the election aren’t solutions but political ploys and will only incentivize illegal immigration, critics argue.

“It is definitely an incentive and will drive more illegal immigration,” former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Tom Homan told The Center Square. “In a time where we are facing historic numbers on the southern border, President Biden announces yet another giveaway program, another reward for illegally entering this country.

“This reinforces that you can enter this country illegally and if you can hide out long enough, you get legal status. This will drive more illegal immigration and they know that and that is why they are doing it.”

If the president really cared about border security and reforming immigration law, he would “reimplement the Migrant Protection Protocols; … restore Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Central American partners; finish construction of new border wall system that Congress funded years ago [which he halted]; and … end mass catch-and-release,” U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green, R-TN, said in a statement. The president “could stop the flow of hundreds of thousands entering this country via unlawful mass-parole programs created by his DHS secretary. And he could encourage Senate Democrats to pass H.R. 2, the only border bill passed by either house of the 118th Congress, to further close loopholes and end avenues for exploitation of our borders by the cartels.

"But he won’t, because the rabidly anti-enforcement, open-borders left is calling the shots for the Biden administration. And the rest of us are paying the price.”

Any executive actions taken related to newly created parole programs or DACA are likely to be challenged by Republican attorneys general.

 
Seriously, who didn't see this coming? Almost no one has done a damn thing to stop the nonsense at the border to this point, don't expect any push back to this plan either. Both sides will see the "potential voters" and not give a damn about the actual citizens of this country.
 
Anyone who has read any distopion novels knows it all revolve around the elites and the underclass. What better way to gain an undrclass than poorly edjucated people from other countries who don't speak your langage
 
Biden presidency death throws are going to get pretty wild. it says to me they know they are going to lose a legitimate election. maybe they know they are going to lose an election they cant rig enough.

its going to get worse.
 
Anyone who has read any distopion novels knows it all revolve around the elites and the underclass. What better way to gain an undrclass than poorly edjucated people from other countries who don't speak your langage
Or just look at history, it's always the upper class using the lower class to eliminate the middle class.

Kinda interesting how egalitarianism and universal franchise tie into it, too. Once the have-nots can vote themselves into ownership of what the haves have created for themselves society is entirely lost.
 
Maybe that steaming piece of shit can have Rachel Morin's family there to help celebrate this momentous occasion, and help illustrate just how fucking spectacular this whole immigration mess has been.

:mad3:
 
Or just look at history, it's always the upper class using the lower class to eliminate the middle class.
You need to quit with this marxist trope. Shit is far more complex than that.

There's haves and have nots at every level trying to make allies with haves and/or have nots above and below them so they can pull a fast on on their peers.

When the middle loses it's usually because they're not rich enough to be diversified (i.e. they own one farm not dozens), not because they got duped. There's always assholes at the top trying to consolidate power. The size of the group and their degree of success ebbs and flows.

Look at the fall of the roman empire or the spread of Protestantism across Europe 1000yr later and the 100+yr of war following each. Sure you can probably cherry pick enough to frame it like a Marxist if that's what your goal is but it's far more of a cluster fuck than that.
 
You need to quit with this marxist trope. Shit is far more complex than that.

There's haves and have nots at every level trying to make allies with haves and/or have nots above and below them so they can pull a fast on on their peers.

When the middle loses it's usually because they're not rich enough to be diversified (i.e. they own one farm not dozens), not because they got duped. There's always assholes at the top trying to consolidate power. The size of the group and their degree of success ebbs and flows.

Look at the fall of the roman empire or the spread of Protestantism across Europe 1000yr later and the 100+yr of war following each. Sure you can probably cherry pick enough to frame it like a Marxist if that's what your goal is but it's far more of a cluster fuck than that.
Nah, brah. Lets try it this way since you see "class" and immediately fall into a programmed line of thought.

The cult of state thrives on promising 'low value people' the lifestyle of 'high value people' with none of the investment which garnered the heightened value to begin with.
 
Nah, brah. Lets try it this way since you see "class" and immediately fall into a programmed line of thought.
You're behaving like a Californian and missing my point, seemingly on purpose. The point is that class framing is dumb and serves to only try and create group distinctions where there are none. Use some mathematical/statistical shit instead of class if that saves the nitpicks over language. You're the one who framed it as class shit in the first place.

The reason I brought up the reformation is because the lines on that issue ran through a pretty good cross section of society so it serves as a good counter example to the tired old "the rich enlisting the poor to keep the middle down" and "the middle enlisting the poor to help them kick out the rich" tropes. People chose where they fell on that issue based on all sorts of reasons and pretty much none of it had to do with anything we'd consider "class".

Edit: and the reason I keep calling you a fucking marxist every time you bring this up is because for someone who seemingly gives a lot of shits about using precise language you sure do seem happy to just outsource to the people who seek to collectivize everything on this one.


The cult of state thrives on promising 'low value people' the lifestyle of 'high value people' with none of the investment which garnered the heightened value to begin with.
Literally every collectivization organization dangles this carrot to mobilize the least useful. Unions, churches, street gangs, etc. They all get power by mobilizing the stupid. Sometimes the particpation of the less useless people who are being stolen from is voluntary, sometimes (states and competing states, the cartlel in this case) it's not. The line between ammoral and not is blurry in the middle.
 
There is already a process for gaining citizenship through marriage. As I understand it, the Biden proposal has three caveats.

1. Must be married to a US Citizen
2. Must have been here 10+ years
3. Must pass a background check.

:laughing: How long is that going to take for 700,000 people.
 
You're behaving like a Californian and missing my point, seemingly on purpose. The point is that class framing is dumb and serves to only try and create group distinctions where there are none. Use some mathematical/statistical shit instead of class if that saves the nitpicks over language. You're the one who framed it as class shit in the first place.

The reason I brought up the reformation is because the lines on that issue ran through a pretty good cross section of society so it serves as a good counter example to the tired old "the rich enlisting the poor to keep the middle down" and "the middle enlisting the poor to help them kick out the rich" tropes. People chose where they fell on that issue based on all sorts of reasons and pretty much none of it had to do with anything we'd consider "class".
sorry but I can no longer make any sense of what you're saying

could you calm down ma'am and talk slower?
 
sorry but I can no longer make any sense of what you're saying

could you calm down ma'am and talk slower?
I'm saying that your class framing is dumb and nonsensical (and marxist) because people don't think in class. They think about "what's good for me"

Framing things as a class struggle by default adds no clarity to discussion (does more harm than good IMO) and reinforces Marxist tropes and lines of thinking and plays into the way they like to frame things).

Any given movement regardless of whether is increases individual freedom or plays into the hand of the collectivists typically enjoys support from a cross section of society that would cut very much across class lines if one attempted to frame it that way.
 
I'm saying that your class framing is dumb and nonsensical (and marxist) because people don't think in class. They think about "what's good for me"

Framing things as a class struggle by default adds no clarity to discussion (does more harm than good IMO) and reinforces Marxist tropes and lines of thinking and plays into the way they like to frame things).

Any given movement regardless of whether is increases individual freedom or plays into the hand of the collectivists typically enjoys support from a cross section of society that would cut very much across class lines if one attempted to frame it that way.

Call it class, call it time preference, call it productivity, call it self control, call it whatever you want.
Language is intentionally misleading.

Those playing the long game will always use those playing the short game. This alone isn't bad nor good. The moral dividing line can only be on the initiation of coercive force.
 
Maybe that steaming piece of shit can have Rachel Morin's family there to help celebrate this momentous occasion, and help illustrate just how fucking spectacular this whole immigration mess has been.

:mad3:
Ideally every family member of someone this happened to could show up with shirts and signs with the victims face, name, and "SAY THEIR NAME!" Bull horns. Chants. The whole nine.
 
Ideally every family member of someone this happened to could show up with shirts and signs with the victims face, name, and "SAY THEIR NAME!" Bull horns. Chants. The whole nine.
Then all those family members get put on the fBI list for armed raids plus IRS audits and so on and so on and so on..........
 
Then all those family members get put on the fBI list for armed raids plus IRS audits and so on and so on and so on..........

And their plan to scare the population into complying is working like a clock. :shaking:


"I want to enact change in this country!!!!!"

But only if it's not an inconvenience.......
 
The path to legal citizenship is fucking dumb, expensive and takes a long ass time. There should be reform to streamline it 100% but an across the board thumbs up isn't the way to go about it.
 
The path to legal citizenship is fucking dumb, expensive and takes a long ass time. There should be reform to streamline it 100% but an across the board thumbs up isn't the way to go about it.

Their only needs to be 3 questions that need answering on the application.....

-Is this person going to be a productive member of society or a leach?

-Is this person a convicted felon and was an all around shitbag in their country?

-Does this person speak ENGLISH?

Easy peasy
 
The path to legal citizenship is fucking dumb, expensive and takes a long ass time. There should be reform to streamline it 100% but an across the board thumbs up isn't the way to go about it.

I had always heard same, but a friend who is a working veterinarian for a state agency, got his through pretty quickly. He'd been on Green Card for a few years, and obviously spoke at least passable English, being from Canada and all. I don't know how much it cost him, but the process was pretty easy and quick.
 
Top Back Refresh