skyhiranger
Well-known member
Is it standard practice to apply a "condition" deduction to my vehicle's ACV when calculating its ACV vs comparables? My vehicle is rated at "normal wear and tear" in all areas, except in the trim and sheet metal, which are rated at "dealer ready" by my insurance and/or CCC1 (the company that does the ACV calculation). I honestly don't even know why some of the other areas aren't rated at "dealer ready"...there are no condition issues with the headliner, dash, carpets (yes, need swept out, but no wear, tears, etc.), seats (have a couple of light wrinkles in the driver's seat leather, but not at all abnormal for a 75K vehicle...I've seen the same vehicle with 38K on it they compared mine to with more wrinkles/waves in it), engine and transmission (no idea why those would not rate at dealer ready...other than if it is because they have dust on them...yes, insurance adjuster actually stated that is an "issue"). They are hitting mine with an $1145 condition adjustment deduction. Mine is in good enough condition that I would be thrilled to be able to find a replacement vehicle with 75K in the same condition. I really don't think I'll be able to...at least not for what CCC1 is saying my ACV is on my vehicle.
Also, when calculating my ACV using comparables, the CCC1 program/algorithm deducts more cents/mile when comparing my 75K vehicle to a 38K vehicle, than it credits when comparing my 75K vehicle to a 111K mile vehicle. Same years, same trims, same options, etc....only real difference is the mileage, from what I can tell. I have several examples of this practice, with various mileages both higher and lower than mine, since I didn't agree with CCC1s initial ACV and gave them some others to compare to (and they took it upon themselves to add about 12 other vehicles to the second valuation report as well (so they could average all of them and get my ACV where they wanted it...is my biased opinion). What is the justification for this? Or is there one? When I questioned CCC1, they said their huge database with all these vehicle values can't calculate my ACV wrong. But the way I look at it, with that huge of a database, they have every opportunity to cherry pick which vehicles they want to use to calculate my ACV (and according to what I have read about the past business practices of CCC1, that is exactly what they do, in some instances).
Yes, I know I have the option of hiring my own appraiser, to dispute the ACV, which I will be looking into next week. But I am just trying to understand if my concerns I brought up above are valid, or if what they are doing is standard practice and there is no way around it, even with a private appraisal?
Bottom line is I just want to be able to buy a replacement vehicle that is the same year, miles, trim, options, condition as mine for the ACV insurance/CCC1 is saying mine is worth (15K). But what I am seeing for averages out there, it is going to cost me $1000-$1500 more to replace my vehicle with a like one.
Also, when calculating my ACV using comparables, the CCC1 program/algorithm deducts more cents/mile when comparing my 75K vehicle to a 38K vehicle, than it credits when comparing my 75K vehicle to a 111K mile vehicle. Same years, same trims, same options, etc....only real difference is the mileage, from what I can tell. I have several examples of this practice, with various mileages both higher and lower than mine, since I didn't agree with CCC1s initial ACV and gave them some others to compare to (and they took it upon themselves to add about 12 other vehicles to the second valuation report as well (so they could average all of them and get my ACV where they wanted it...is my biased opinion). What is the justification for this? Or is there one? When I questioned CCC1, they said their huge database with all these vehicle values can't calculate my ACV wrong. But the way I look at it, with that huge of a database, they have every opportunity to cherry pick which vehicles they want to use to calculate my ACV (and according to what I have read about the past business practices of CCC1, that is exactly what they do, in some instances).
Yes, I know I have the option of hiring my own appraiser, to dispute the ACV, which I will be looking into next week. But I am just trying to understand if my concerns I brought up above are valid, or if what they are doing is standard practice and there is no way around it, even with a private appraisal?
Bottom line is I just want to be able to buy a replacement vehicle that is the same year, miles, trim, options, condition as mine for the ACV insurance/CCC1 is saying mine is worth (15K). But what I am seeing for averages out there, it is going to cost me $1000-$1500 more to replace my vehicle with a like one.