What's new

78 F150 4x4 SWB Budget build?

Levigarrett76

Zeus of the Sluice
Joined
May 20, 2020
Member Number
631
Messages
1,103
Loc
GA
Finally back moving on this after 2 year delay moving/house/shop/life

I need it in a few weeks, and despite comp cams being my go-to in past 460 builds im not looking to wipe a cam i waited 2-3 months on...

Budget motor as follows:

15cc dish 1.77" CH later style efi piston 99 block 460 with c9 heads, home garage bowl blending and budget exhaust porting.

going in 78 f150, c6 & 3.50 gears stock convertor, has 33's now, not sure on new tire size but likely 33-36 range.

Will be truck manifolds at first and later to mad dog fender exit 1-7/8 headers

performer intake, 1" spacer and 800 DP holley with all in timing by 2500 rpm 34*

Will be used beating around in the woods, and occasional trip to town and burnouts. I would likely leave the stock cam but i think given the compression it will do some good to bleed some off with a mild cam running 90 octane non E gas...

this cam? - Ford Hydraulic Flat Tappet Camshaft

215/221 @ .050", .519'/.514", 112* LSA, 277/283 adv.


or this? - Ford Hydraulic Flat Tappet Camshaft



215/221 @ .050", .527"/.535", 112* LSA, 274/281 adv.

or this? - https://www.autozone.com/internal-engine/camshaft/p/melling-camshaft-24206/179938_0_0

214/224 @ .050", .511"/.544", 112* LSA, 292/302 adv.


I'm not sure what which uses .06 or whatever for adv. numbers vs not etc...

I really like the Howards cams 215/225 But cant get a good ETA on it.


IMG_6863.jpg
IMG_6865.jpg
IMG_6866.jpg
IMG_6864.jpg


73655599158__E3BDAC2C-8FC9-4209-B6B5-29DE4E4A0C22.jpg
 
I would choose the Melling cam due to the extra exhaust split/duration. The 460 is exhaust restricted even with heads ported. Stock 460 cam has +12 on exhaust. The ford ones are only +6 to the +10 of the Melling. Not sure what the max lift of your heads are. I run a custom 213/227.

The -15cc 1.77 pistons calculate to 0.027 in the hole, which yields 9.7:1 w/ 75 cc chambers. Good fit for any of cam you listed.

0.027 down and 0.045 gasket is quench of 0.072, which isn't great, but should run OK on 87 octane. Zero decking to fix quench would raise CR too much and need different pistons or heads.

You will need custom length push rods. The 460 geometry is poor already, buy decent push rods.

The manifolds will restrict 25-30+ hp. Why fender exit headers? Seems like a pain in the ass.
 
I agree with you on cam-i was leaning towards the melling but heard its an old tech grind and wondered what might be lacking in the lobe profiles then i think im overthinking it for a budget build. I had read a hot rod article about newer grinds with less lift on exhaust side with more duration lending itself to better exhaust scavenging due to pulses or something compared to more traditional grinds
Where did you get your cam? Scotty j?

I have read for yrs about the insufficent exhaust due to lincoln engine compartment design restraints but even still the 460 with stock heads seems to make decent power with say a comp 218/224 like here



(and i dont think these were original 10.5:1 pistons that richard claims, i bet this closer to 9.25:1 cause these look like the 73-up carb pistons)

Thabk you for the tips on compression/quench without spending $ to try and make perfect i felt like this woukd be a decent combo. Engine has only about 300 hrs on it and is in great shape.

Ive got a push rod length checker i plan to employ, what brand pushrods did you use?

Definitely wish manfolds werent such a choke point, they are so trouble free and ive got an almost brand new set of truck style

Main reason for fenderwell headers is mad dog makes a really nice header for $100 less than l&l and i can get a 1-7/8 instead of 1-3/4. They are local and fenderwell makes it really easy to run exhaust at home. Probably go with turned out in front of tires

Ive run both l&l chassis exit and fenderwell exits in the past and other than tires rubbing the fender exits (39 boggers on 12” wide wheels) both were good and the thick flanges never gave me a leak. I stayed on top of keeping bolts tight

What headers were you running again?

Know anyone who runs the mid length l&l or the hookers?
 
Any interest in calling up comp [or whoever you like] and getting a cutsom grind?
Honestly no, i mostly don't really feel up to waiting and playing supply chain / back log games

And the last 460 i built i did that with lunati gave then all the specs and was dissappointed with the results. It wound up being under cammed (12.2:1 472 with edelbrock rpm heads in 2007) for my use
 
Hahahah:flipoff2:

Well shit

Looks like someone port matched the c9 heads to a cj intake, or am i wrong and this was just s gasket match? I guess i need to drag the heavy ass cj intake up on the bench and see

I know it was common practice to run the cast iron scj intake on regular sized ports , but what about the opposite? I would think this would promote turbulence

Ive got the cast iron scj intake off the propane 460 i could use, but id rather have the additional low speed torque. Or just go bigger cam?:laughing: Or port match the performer?:barf:

Or do i run these 95cc mystery heads instead?

IMG_7044.jpeg
IMG_7045.jpeg
IMG_7046.jpeg
IMG_7047.jpeg
IMG_7048.jpeg

What say irate?
 
Last edited:
Ahh summit, all they got in stock is hydraulic rollers and the melling cams

Ill dig up and lay my stock intake gaskets on it and i guess that will tell me :homer:

After some googling it looks like maybe they was just gasket matched
 
Got an idea of your compression ratio?
 
Guessing about 9.7 like rattle said based on 75cc c9’s and late efi pistons
 
Its just a gasket match

I gonna pick up some 1230 to delete the egr crossover
IMG_7066.jpeg
 
I would choose the Melling cam due to the extra exhaust split/duration. The 460 is exhaust restricted even with heads ported. Stock 460 cam has +12 on exhaust. The ford ones are only +6 to the +10 of the Melling. Not sure what the max lift of your heads are. I run a custom 213/227.

The -15cc 1.77 pistons calculate to 0.027 in the hole, which yields 9.7:1 w/ 75 cc chambers. Good fit for any of cam you listed.

0.027 down and 0.045 gasket is quench of 0.072, which isn't great, but should run OK on 87 octane. Zero decking to fix quench would raise CR too much and need different pistons or heads.

You will need custom length push rods. The 460 geometry is poor already, buy decent push rods.

The manifolds will restrict 25-30+ hp. Why fender exit headers? Seems like a pain in the ass.
Howards does not have an eta, they are waiting on raw matierials. They do have this grind available.

I dont really want to have a lumpy idle/poor vacuum while trying to idle around in the woods.

I found some dyno numbers where a guy had run the melling 214/224 grind (sounds like its a really old grind, ford marine or something) against the 218/224 comp xtreme grind and the comp killed the melling on low end and the melling was very peaky

What you think about these cams? they have about 10* more adv. duration than the comparable fast/noisy comp cams grinds, but less than the huge melling adv. duration (both at .06)

210/226 .510/.536 112* LSA (268/286 adv.)


224/234 .538/.562 112* LSA (303/308 adv.)

Im leaning towards the 210/226:beer:
 
Well My guess is Howards and Crower all use the same core supplier, because everyone seems to be waiting on cores with no eta.

Waiting to hear back from RM competition
 
Broke out the ol DD last night

Melling/elgin etc generic grind 214/224

214224_1__4aafc9562e880bc8544f200dcf6f972c2714db89.png

214224_2__f89da0445f644c854315f8b8c16245ead4bf9c05.png




Comp 218/226 xtreme 4x4..only even slightly considered this because its basically the only thing mild in stock right now, I ram this in a 79 Supercab back in 2001 and wiped a lobe....:shaking:

6_comp_1__57ce281c0b24f391d6b5768a59e861cf3f19bc64.png

6_comp_2__b5f70cd0e7cc2ee71e850cacdd5c5be544e80fa4.png




Scotty 213/227

Interesting how his makes a little more everywhere
scotty_1__82ebb4e24f6776f428add50d73333d006a62ce60.png

scotty_2__ea8417f289ebfc0249a24a6c2aeeb5ebc41d09ed.png
 
Top Back Refresh