What's new

2017 Vegas Shooting

There used to be a huge thread on the old board that would resurface every time a new tidbit got dropped in the news. I couldn't find one here. It has been a long time since I've seen anything new but yesterday some reporter started dropping supposed "intel" that I had never heard. The most interesting thing to me about the whole Vegas shooting was how quickly the news died out on it and everything was buried and wrapped up with a nice bow. That alone made me think something was up from the beginning. So, FWIW...

Login • Instagram

https://twitter.com/HowleyReporter
Dem media made it disappear because they couldn't blame the shooting done by an angry Hillary lost voting Democrat on Republicans. If you notice, even Dems won't bring up that fact in their anti-gun arguments.
 
Popping back up...

any other sources?
 
Popping back up...

Isis - check
Soros - check
Gates - check
Trump - check
Deep State - check
Insider trading - check

What? No mention of Epstein or Hillary's emails? Seems there's some holes in that article.
 
Popping back up...


Did you actually read this? Did you notice the lack of any sources or evidence aside from a long, rambling word document containing information that was found online?

This is yet another example of DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON THE INTERNET.

:flipoff2:
 
Popping back up...

IT was a fascinating read. But for all they know, they sure don't know a lot. Why no attempt to identify 'his team'? Where is this dude now?
 
Did you actually read this? Did you notice the lack of any sources or evidence aside from a long, rambling word document containing information that was found online?

This is yet another example of DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON THE INTERNET.

:flipoff2:
Maybe, but I did read it all. And there is plenty of information in there that was never publicly available. So who knows?
 
Did you actually read this? Did you notice the lack of any sources or evidence aside from a long, rambling word document containing information that was found online?

This is yet another example of DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON THE INTERNET.

:flipoff2:
Of course i read it. I wouldn’t have posted it if i didn’t. However, reading it and being all in on believing it are not equivalent in any way, shape, or form. I thought it would be interesting fodder for conversation. If that bothers you, well, tough cookies. :flipoff2:
 
The shit they talk about in that report were disproven years ago.
 
 
That makes no sense what so ever? Who would believe that as a motive?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You got me. I’ll admit it

From the article:

The high-stakes gambler who opened fire on a concert crowd on the Las Vegas Strip, killing 60 and injuring hundreds more, was angry over how the casinos were treating him despite his high-roller status, according to FBI documents made public this week. A fellow gambler, whose name is redacted from the hundreds of pages of new documents, told the FBI that casinos had previously treated high rollers like Paddock to free cruises, flights, penthouse suites, rides in “nice cars” and tours in wine country. But in the years leading up to the Oct. 1, 2017, mass shooting in Las Vegas, the red carpet treatment had faded, the gambler said, and casinos even began banning some high rollers “for playing well and winning large quantities of money.” Paddock had been banned from three Reno casinos, the gambler said. The gambler said he believed “the stress could easily be what caused” Paddock “to snap.”

...and then...

“We were unable to determine a motive for the shooter,” the statement said. “Speculating on a motive causes more harm to the hundreds of people who were victims that night.”
 

And interesting that they just released that days after the last false-flag shooting....

brainwashing.jpeg
 
What's this sudden story a distraction from? Why wait 6 years to suddenly release a weak ass discovery like this? You would think the fbi would have smarter people
 
That makes no sense what so ever? Who would believe that as a motive?
Hey, the motive for this Mass murder of strangers makes no sense!

Ok, name some mass murders of innocents that do make sense.

You can't, because it never does make sense to a sane person
 
Because right now it's all about those horrible guns, so let's dredge up more crap about a story that couldn't hold its own when it happened, but now we can bring it up because most people have forgotten all the details and.... it makes guns look bad.
 
Hey, the motive for this Mass murder of strangers makes no sense!

Ok, name some mass murders of innocents that do make sense.

You can't, because it never does make sense to a sane person
Nope. There are plenty of groups that deserve to be left sharing a hole in the ground.

How bad does the crime one has to commit to be worth the death penalty have to be?

Ok now what's the negative effects of that crime? Who is harmed, how much?

So what happens if somebody creates equal harm but spread over a longer time? They deserve to die too, right?

And this is why when shit hits the fan "intellectuals" and other "useful idiot cog in the machine" types wind up losing their heads. While they are not responsible for the same scale of suffering and hardship as the deposed leaders may be they are still responsible for more hardship and suffering than a man who commits a single brutal murder and since he loses his head they do too.
 
Top Back Refresh