There is another axis stacked on the Z but it is not powered it only slides, it usually has springs to keep the torch at the bottom of the travel so when the the Z drives down it goes until the float switch trips, then retracts a certain number of steps allowing you to dial in your pierce/cut height to the .001" of a inch.
This is a decent explanation.
Once the torch has fired and cut established (time delay from torch fire) the torch will switch to THC and use the raw arc voltage measured by the Torch Height Controller to keep the torch at the correct height with OUT contacting the plate.Interesting. I imagine that works fine for smaller cuts, like in the video, but ohmic sensing is better for longer cuts, since it is sensing real-time and can adapt for big gradual bows in large plates?
Nice work on that setup.One problem that I ran into with my table using ohmic sensing is sometimes the torch tip would hit a bit of slag or something that would insulate it. Z would keep going down until my magnetic torch breakaway kicked in. I have now added an air blast when touching off and a floating head with a limit switch that acts as an overtravel alarm. Just finished the project (Still have to improve the wiring situation) but so far so good. It is much less violent now if it happens.
I'm confused about ohmic sensing. I've seen references to using the torch tip as the probe but then I've also seen a separate, stand-alone probe referred to as an ohmic sensor. (Often they're green.) Are these just two ways to do the same thing, or something entirely different?I found when I was trying to wrap my head around all this stuff was to actually use the manuals for the stuff I was looking at to help teach me the stuff I didn't understand, that made a lot more sense to me and I was able to better follow what I was trying to accomplish.
This is the Myplasm/Promo instructions
THC stuff is around page 22
MyPlasm CNC System - Proma-Elektronika
proma-elektronika.com
The only one I am familiar with uses the actual torch shield/tip to do the sensing.I'm confused about ohmic sensing. I've seen references to using the torch tip as the probe but then I've also seen a separate, stand-alone probe referred to as an ohmic sensor. (Often they're green.) Are these just two ways to do the same thing, or something entirely different?
I was thinking about that when this started, using one of your current motors for the Z would be pretty smart I think, IMO the Z is the least critical axis to drive, not much weight and accelerations are low.I'm going to have to buy 2 motors no matter what. I want another for my y-axis and I'll need one for my THC. Would it behoove me to use my current nema 24 from my y-axis on my THC and then get two higher torque nema 24's for my Y-axis? Or is there a reason not to mix motor sizes?
At this point of this video, what are the capacitors and rectifier he is referring to? I don't see those in the system diagram.
Also, in this part of the diagram, I'm pretty sure the component on the left is the power supply, but what is the larger component to the right of it?
say what?any sort of 3d part will fail just because of heat exposure
lifter station, the idea is great, but it will not last long
I'm going to have to buy 2 motors no matter what. I want another for my y-axis and I'll need one for my THC. Would it behoove me to use my current nema 24 from my y-axis on my THC and then get two higher torque nema 24's for my Y-axis? Or is there a reason not to mix motor sizes?
With a gantry that heavy there's probably no such thing as too much powerI'd go 34's on x and y and flip a 23 to z and you'll have the other as a spare.
If I go 34's on Y I have to change all my bracketry. You don't think that going from a single 178 oz/in 23 to 2x 270 oz/in motors would be a sufficient upgrade? That's 3x the power that I used to have. While it was less than ideal, the single 178 did what I needed most of the time. The only time it didn't was when there was something physically wrong. (Which was often. :) )I'd go 34's on x and y and flip a 23 to z and you'll have the other as a spare.
I think that's solid plan, I thought we were still guessing about motors.If I go 34's on Y I have to change all my bracketry. You don't think that going from a single 178 oz/in 23 to 2x 270 oz/in motors would be a sufficient upgrade? That's 3x the power that I used to have. While it was less than ideal, the single 178 did what I needed most of the time. The only time it didn't was when there was something physically wrong. (Which was often. :) )
X is the only axis I never had a single issue with. I see no need to change motors there.
Haha, we were until shortly before that post. I found that there only seems to be 3 sizes / strengths of 23 motors. After I started looking up photos of them it was obvious that I had the smallest ones, which are 178. 270 is the middle size. I forget the next one up but it requires a bigger driver, so I figured I'd skip that so as to keep all my drivers the same.I think that's solid plan, I thought we were still guessing about motors.
I feel like I put bigger motors on my 3x3 table...
you cant hear?say what?
But in reference to what though?you cant hear?
heat will kill the part
I have tried a few 3d printed parts, the heat always kills the part that was 3d printed eventually
There's some good discussion of acceleration/IPM in this thread that might help you lock in to a motor size drive ratio etc.Haha, we were until shortly before that post. I found that there only seems to be 3 sizes / strengths of 23 motors. After I started looking up photos of them it was obvious that I had the smallest ones, which are 178. 270 is the middle size. I forget the next one up but it requires a bigger driver, so I figured I'd skip that so as to keep all my drivers the same.
But in reference to what though?
I didn't think 3dp parts were brought up?
This is what I was referring to
This is what I was referring to
I'm using some ca glued pla torch mount, its just a "get it working" place holder but so far so good.One nice thing about not doing this for a living is that I can afford some down time to experiment a little, especially when it comes to printing stuff like that, that is nearly free to me. I am printing a version of that floating head right now. (It's a remixed version that bolts directly to the plate of the Openbuilds z-axis that I ordered.) I'm trying it with ABS first and, if that doesn't work out, will use PETG. Both of those materials withstand heat way better than PLA. There's also some carbon fiber filaments that get annealed after being printed that might be worth trying, we'll see how far my patience takes me.
At this point, I'm being really conservative with my spending until I find out what my tax bill is going to be. So things in this thread may go quiet for a bit but it will not die. I am 100% committed to getting this table back up and running at this point.