What's new

Vaccine FAILURE, on every level.

One of the most painful "we told you so" moments in the history of man.

I wonder how many of these "unexpected deaths" are even being linked to the vax in some way. My guess is only a mere fraction of them are.

"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." - Revelation 18:23

sorceries - Greek "pharmakeia", the use or administration of drugs. The nations are deceived by "Mystery Babylon's pharmakeia" or pharmaceuticals including "vaccines".
 
_nc_ohc=7c-MsEMHv5cAX96T75X&_nc_ht=scontent-fml2-1.jpg
 
One of the most painful "we told you so" moments in the history of man.

I wonder how many of these "unexpected deaths" are even being linked to the vax in some way. My guess is only a mere fraction of them are.

"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." - Revelation 18:23

sorceries - Greek "pharmakeia", the use or administration of drugs. The nations are deceived by "Mystery Babylon's pharmakeia" or pharmaceuticals including "vaccines".
How's about posting that in your Bible Prophecy thread & keeping this one based in science, or at least based on scientific assertions that can ultimately be proven / disproven by evidence? No disrespect, but adding supernatural conspiracy to this thread is detrimental to the credibility of evidentiary contributions.
 
How's about posting that in your Bible Prophecy thread & keeping this one based in science, or at least based on scientific assertions that can ultimately be proven / disproven by evidence? No disrespect, but adding supernatural conspiracy to this thread is detrimental to the credibility of evidentiary contributions.
Yah... science has definitely been spot on the last few years, hah? :laughing:
 
Yah... science has definitely been spot on the last few years, hah? :laughing:
Reread what you quoted and tell me where I boosted "the Science". Huh, nowhere? Looks like I was advocating rational discussion of evidence not cheapened by conspiracy theory, regardless of whose deity was the basis of said conspiracy theory.

God is all-powerful, so you don't need to talk shit for him, right? :flipoff2:
 
Reread what you quoted and tell me where I boosted "the Science". Huh, nowhere? Looks like I was advocating rational discussion of evidence not cheapened by conspiracy theory, regardless of whose deity was the basis of said conspiracy theory.

God is all-powerful, so you don't need to talk shit for him, right? :flipoff2:

What has he brought to the discussion that has any less credibility than “the science?”
 
One of the most painful "we told you so" moments in the history of man.

I wonder how many of these "unexpected deaths" are even being linked to the vax in some way. My guess is only a mere fraction of them are.

"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." - Revelation 18:23

sorceries - Greek "pharmakeia", the use or administration of drugs. The nations are deceived by "Mystery Babylon's pharmakeia" or pharmaceuticals including "vaccines".
Nice
 
Reread what you quoted and tell me where I boosted "the Science". Huh, nowhere? Looks like I was advocating rational discussion of evidence not cheapened by conspiracy theory, regardless of whose deity was the basis of said conspiracy theory.
K.
How's about posting that in your Bible Prophecy thread & keeping this one based in science, or at least based on scientific assertions that can ultimately be proven / disproven by evidence? No disrespect, but adding supernatural conspiracy to this thread is detrimental to the credibility of evidentiary contributions.
There it is in festive ORANGE. The science flaunted and boasted over in the last few years makes the bible look like the most credible, underrated book in all the world at this point. :flipoff2:

One thing is for sure... the scientific community, as well as US medical community has literally shot itself in the foot so far as credibility. :laughing:
 
What has he brought to the discussion that has any less credibility than “the science?”
I tried to make it clear I wasn't referring to "the Science", rather the scientific method.

My preference, in this thread about vaccines, is discussing evidence in pursuit of ultimately provable truth, in the absence of faith-based speculation (be it God, Allah, Fauci, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster :laughing:).

Saying, "this is a supernatural act based on my stretching the meaning of this old writing" throws the scientific method out the window and then it boils down to "take my word for it" which is how this whole vax / lockdown mess got started.
 
There it is in festive ORANGE. The science flaunted and boasted over in the last few years makes the bible look like the most credible, underrated book in all the world at this point. :flipoff2:
If your faith tells you those predictions are on point, then those predictions are on point . . . to you & folks chugging the same Kool-Aid.

One thing is for sure... the scientific community, as well as US medical community has literally shot itself in the foot so far as credibility. :laughing:
I'm not talking about the "scientific" community charlatans who've wrecked our lives, I'm talking about the scientific method which has never failed me in practical application. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, just trying to keep "take my word for it" out of a thread attempting to yield the truth. With all due respect, no human being has the right to say "take my word for it" - God on the other hand, yes :laughing:
 
I tried to make it clear I wasn't referring to "the Science", rather the scientific method.

My preference, in this thread about vaccines, is discussing evidence in pursuit of ultimately provable truth, in the absence of faith-based speculation (be it God, Allah, Fauci, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster :laughing:).

Saying, "this is a supernatural act based on my stretching the meaning of this old writing" throws the scientific method out the window and then it boils down to "take my word for it" which is how this whole vax / lockdown mess got started.

Your preference is to ignore evidence that doesn’t fit your narrative, it seems.

What other sources of evidence should be excluded ? Just to be sure that the thread aligns with your personal definition and perspective.
 
Only the ones that cannot be proven or disproven because opinion is not evidence :homer:

Proven or disproven by whom? All science is opinion and interpretation, so you’re eliminating more sources than the soils scientist off his medication.
 
Proven or disproven by whom? All science is opinion and interpretation, so you’re eliminating more sources than the soils scientist off his medication.
Look, I got no dog in this fight, but if you guys start down the Book of Revelations path with Fauci riding the 5th horse covered in locusts delivering the flask of murna to the 7 headed dragon- then it could lead me/ some to not trust your other postings as credible info. Even if they are in fact credible.

This vaxx bad? Yes

This vaxx a master plan of the yet unseen antichrist to inject a substance that will melt the salvation juice from your body and strengthen the army of beelzebub? Uh let's skip that
 
Look, I got no dog in this fight, but if you guys start down the Book of Revelations path with Fauci riding the 5th horse covered in locusts delivering the flask of murna to the 7 headed dragon- then it could lead me/ some to not trust your other postings as credible info. Even if they are in fact credible.

This vaxx bad? Yes

This vaxx a master plan of the yet unseen antichrist to inject a substance that will melt the salvation juice from your body and strengthen the army of beelzebub? Uh let's skip that

While I pretty much agree with MChat, I also agree with this.

Keep it to news articles and other known things. Speculation weakens all arguments.
 
Look, I got no dog in this fight, but if you guys start down the Book of Revelations path with Fauci riding the 5th horse covered in locusts delivering the flask of murna to the 7 headed dragon- then it could lead me/ some to not trust your other postings as credible info. Even if they are in fact credible.

This vaxx bad? Yes

This vaxx a master plan of the yet unseen antichrist to inject a substance that will melt the salvation juice from your body and strengthen the army of beelzebub? Uh let's skip that
Yah... I don't know about all that either. I do know if I hear "Trust the science", or "Let's keep the discussion based in the truth of science" one more time I am gonna go berserk and hurt people, using science and shit. :flipoff2:

I think it's hilarious that some people will bash God, while literally waving the science flag and screaming how anything else isn't truth. While at the same exact flippin time acknowledging science is flawed and mistaken at any given time. :laughing:

Ergo, don't be a hypocritic dilltard.
 
Yah... I don't know about all that either. I do know if I hear "Trust the science", or "Let's keep the discussion based in the truth of science" one more time I am gonna go berserk and hurt people, using science and shit. :flipoff2:

I think it's hilarious that some people will bash God, while literally waving the science flag and screaming how anything else isn't truth. While at the same exact flippin time acknowledging science is flawed and mistaken at any given time. :laughing:

Ergo, don't be a hypocritic dilltard.
Which science are you talking about? 'The Science' or science? Because those are 2 separate things. Sort of like liberalism vs the current crop of modern liberalism... which isn't liberal at all.
 
Which science are you talking about? 'The Science' or science? Because those are 2 separate things. Sort of like liberalism vs the current crop of modern liberalism... which isn't liberal at all.
Well... after all the chaotic mess we witnessed the last while now, and the term "science" being tarnished and ruined for many because it was based in lies... I get your point, to a point. After all is said and done we all know we were gaslighted, lied to, and straight up compromised in health and mental stability using "science" as the vessel to deliver us.

So it's basically the last time I will ever be told... (trying really hard to not burst out in laughter here) that science is truth and my faith is all premised in make believe and lies.

When someone steps into any argument with his opinion or faith based approach, we are all just supposed to correct that guy with "follow the science dude, you're being ridiculous"?

Yah, that's not happening anymore. Whatever credibility we were all explained to that science had, is done.
 
Top Back Refresh