- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
- Member Number
- 4387
- Messages
- 3,389
. Kids are banned from riding bikes back there.
That'll fuck up a summer day for a kid pretty quick
. Kids are banned from riding bikes back there.
I'm building a crane basically like pictured. Verticals are 4" x 1/4 square tube because it's what I had. The I beam is 4" x 13# and sticks out ~10ft past the rear most support. I might reduce it to 9ft or 8ft, certainly not less than 7ft. past the rear most support. I feel like I need something so that it doesn't fuck right off with the slightest side load.
What should I make the orange MS paint lines out of?
Is 2" sch40 enough? 3" sch40 seems like overkill. Maybe 2.5" sch40? Any serious benefit to going square instead of round?
He does. IIRC it's really tall and painted blue.Seems like the well driller dude has that setup on a trailer
He does. IIRC it's really tall and painted blue.
It only has 4' stick out, maximum legal that doesn't require a permanent flag. It will do 4klbs with an issue.So dont ask us. Ask him
It only has 4' stick out, maximum legal that doesn't require a permanent flag. It will do 4klbs with an issue.
You know what I mean right? A marker flag. Ours has a tail marker light up there.Can you just paint flag on the stickout?
You think I need to go all the way to 3" (nominal) or is 2.5" fine? I'm more concerned about side loads from picking shit thatI really don't think that 2" sch 40 is going to be doing much at that length and angle.
I think this would be better to prevent deflection from side loading.You think I need to go all the way to 3" (nominal) or is 2.5" fine? I'm more concerned about side loads from picking shit thatisn't right under the beamis a couple feet to the side of the trailer than I am about bending loads. I can (and probably will) throw a big fuckin truss over the top to improve the resistance to bending. However stupid you are with yours probably double that for me.
I could do that pretty easily but I think it would just transfer more force into the uprights. I'm not particularly worried about folding them over or tearing them out of their pockets in the deck but I think having something run from the tip of the beam down to near the mounts would be better, no?I think this would be better to prevent deflection from side loading.
bottom travelling beam made outta square tubeA w4x13 will fuck right off with the smallest of side load. Your idea will work but be in the way far to often.
The one pictured with the bracing above is better.
Better than all that is a beam under beam so it can telescope out as needed.
Need a more substantial beam though.
I Think a trolley on the top of the I beam with out riggers from it coming down at an angle as wide as the truck and contacting the ground would be a good idea the bottom 6'~ would be removable & adjustable while the top would ride the trolley back to the truck and attach to it for storage. Or maybe I'm over thinking it.Edit: I do like that that doesn't get in the way of cargo though. But maybe that's a bad thing because it enables more stupidity.
Damn. Good luck with your future endeavors .I got let go today.
Thanks manDamn. Good luck with your future endeavors .
I got let go today.
I went thru that in May.I got let go today.
It doesn't have to be cool, as much as funny. It can even be funny to someone else. You know, at your expense.Did you do anything cool to deserve it?
It doesn't have to be cool, as much as funny. It can even be funny to someone else. You know, at your expense.
Unfortunately no.Did you do anything cool to deserve it?
it'll be in the fuckin way alot lolI really don't think that 2" sch 40 is going to be doing much at that length and angle.
But, let him do it so he can post up on how many times he hits his fucking head on them. Probably be worse than shin to hitch contact.it'll be in the fuckin way alot lol