Scott Cee aka 2drx4
Taste the butwhole
So, the Marlin 1895 Dark.
How badly do you hate it, and why?
How badly do you hate it, and why?
I don’t hate it, but I’ve never had a boner for lever guns, traditional or otherwise. Probably designed to be used for “home defense” in some communist shit hole or a state where you can’t own a proper weapon.
If it’s available in reasonable calibers it might not make a bad woods/ranch/knock around gun.
Looks like it’s just .45-70, good choice for a woods gun but it rather have .44 magnum for a self defense crossover load. More capacity and faster follow up shots.
Cool option here: https://www.marlinfirearms.com/lever...model-1894-sbl
I've shot a couple different factory loads out of mine.
Factory 300 grn. RNFP with a charge light enough for older guns isn't too bad and fairly inexpensive (around a $1.00 each/bulk).
Hornady leverlution 325 grn. flex point boots quite a bit more and is around $2.00 each.
I'm a lever gun fan in general; own a Model 94 30-30, Govt. 45-70 and a .357 and always looking for more. I also like black guns - I had to go back to PBB and search, but in October of 2012 posted when this was released: https://www.guns.com/news/review/gun...on-30-30-video - it's a Mossberg 464 30-30 that was released at the height of zombie/tacticool.
I don't love or hate the Marlin 1895, but can't see myself buying one.
I hate Mossberg safety's.
Well it's a lever, so it does nothing for me. 45-70 is cool because it's a big thumper, and it's plastic so it won't get soaked and warp...but it's a remlin, so it will rust horribly. 3/10, I wouldn't be mad if I won one, but I wouldn't pay more than $100.
There is pre-order for it in .44 Mag being offered, and it's unclear to me but I think they intend to offer it in a half dozen or so calibers at some point. I'm not sure why, they've made it for a while in 45-70, but maybe that was just the test run to see if there was a market for it and they're now adding to it? The .44 Mag would get you a couple more rounds in the tube and about 75% less shoulder hamburgering potential.
IMHO the 1892 action is superior if you're going to go with a handgun round.
I'm curious how decent it would be to shoot the 45-70 with a decent brake on it.
I haven’t shot a .45-70, but a buddy of
mine has a .444 Marlin that wasn’t as bad as I expected. Probably close to a 3” magnum turkey load.
The .44 Magnum models hold 8+1 instead of 5+1, I don’t think many people realize how much closer they are to a rifle round than a pistol round. With a 16” barrel you should be able to push a 200 gr bullet at 1,800 FPS. Plenty for home defense.
Well it's a lever, so it does nothing for me. 45-70 is cool because it's a big thumper, and it's plastic so it won't get soaked and warp...but it's a remlin, so it will rust horribly. 3/10, I wouldn't be mad if I won one, but I wouldn't pay more than $100.
The stocks are painted wood. There goes that theory.
Looks like it’s just .45-70, good choice for a woods gun but it rather have .44 magnum for a self defense crossover load. More capacity and faster follow up shots.
I hate lever guns that have a safety.
Wonder what sort of cleanup would be involved with a 45-70 short range COM hit on two legged vermin in your living room!
I'm pretty certain you'd not be getting the stain out of the carpet.