- Joined
- May 19, 2020
- Member Number
- 282
- Messages
- 309
I am still pretty far out from starting this, but with graduation from graduate school being behind me the possibility is more real. There are a lot of good entry model machines out there, and they are tempting, I still think this might be a better situation for where I am. First, I want to learn how to hook up and program all of the electronics and control software. Second, the personal challenge is exciting to me, and third, I excluding my time, I think I could build a slightly better machine then I could buy outright dollar for dollar. This is still a fun hobby for myself.
I already have a bunch of stuff in my garage to start a build and at this time this is guiding the direction I am going. Ideally a small table will be built for now, but a larger one will come into play later or be constructed later. First off, the direction I am thinking about going.
Basic overview: 2x5 cnc plasma table, with an THC running a hypertherm powermax 45 plasma. Will use cold rolled steel and skate bearings for x and y liner motion along with pack and pinion drive with stepper motors. I don't see needing more then 300 ipm cutting, but can always use the hypertherm fine cut slow speed settings (150 ipm)
I already have a bunch of stuff in my garage to start a build and at this time this is guiding the direction I am going. Ideally a small table will be built for now, but a larger one will come into play later or be constructed later. First off, the direction I am thinking about going.
Basic overview: 2x5 cnc plasma table, with an THC running a hypertherm powermax 45 plasma. Will use cold rolled steel and skate bearings for x and y liner motion along with pack and pinion drive with stepper motors. I don't see needing more then 300 ipm cutting, but can always use the hypertherm fine cut slow speed settings (150 ipm)
- Frame
- 2x2 1/8" steel. At this time I am pretty set on 5 foot width because I already have a gantry that is 5" wide. If I do not use this gantry and build one I would like the idea of being able to build a larger table later, and only having to move over my gantry.
- Water pan: This is almost not an option. Though I have debated a down draft option in the past.
- I have debated using 3x3 1/8", but i already have the 2x2 in my garage and don't think it will greatly hurt me in rigidity.
- Gantry:
- I have a steel cnc plasma style gantry sitting in my garage. It is big enough to give me a 5' wide cut width. It already had CRS on it for rails and mounts for the CNC router parts style rails.
- Z axis:
- I do not have a plan on this yet. I have not decided if I want to build this from scratch, or buy one. I am pretty tempted to buy one, but it seems anything decent is 300 bucks. In contrast I found this kit of amazon that has all the parts to build a decent one.https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...YEPQ0S7Z&psc=1
- Linear Travel:
- As stated earlier, I already have pre-drilled CRS that is 3"x1/4" and the CNC router parts style carriages. While HIWIN style rails seem to be about the best that is out there, and several manufactures are moving to this as an option, I think at this time keeping the budget low, and using what I have is the best bet
- Motion control is going to be 3:1 belt reduced rack and pinion drive. According to Jim Colt and others, cnc plasmas do best when 1 stepper revolution=1 inch of travel. I might try to build my own belt reduction, and this would be idea, but I have had a hard time locating parts that would be much cheaper then simply buying the CNC router parts gear reduction units. The only thing I don't like about most units out there and they are spring tension. This seems to increase wear, which later decreases accuracy, but for hobby use it is negotiable about how much this will matter. Sure, I have illusions of grandeur that show me making millions with this table cutting 24/7, but in reality this probably won't happen. If I was going to use a non spring tensioned gear reduction, it would probably quickly guide me down the path of building a whole gantry pretty quickly.
- As stated earlier, I already have pre-drilled CRS that is 3"x1/4" and the CNC router parts style carriages. While HIWIN style rails seem to be about the best that is out there, and several manufactures are moving to this as an option, I think at this time keeping the budget low, and using what I have is the best bet
- Motion Control: At this point, Linux CNC seems to be the best out there, all of the current manufactures are moving to linux based programs as mach has shown to be buggy. Personally I go back on forth on this frequently between three options.
- Linux cnc with a Mesa 7I96 card, with their THC cad. This seems to be about the best option out there for use with Linux CNC. This also emcompasses option one and two below.
- Find the cheapest stepper motor and drivers on ebay/amazon to keep the budget low. With this route I would probably go with Nema 23 425 oz/in motors.
- Realize, if I build a decent motion control now, I can most likely use it on a larger or upgraded table alter, and get 640 oz/in Nema 34's from automation technologies along with their kelling drivers and power supply. I believe this option will be about 300-400 dollars more expensive based on current calculations.
- Mach3/4/windows based cnc controller. If I go this route, I will most likely get this cut, that has the BOB and software with it, use that to get moving and upgrade to mach from there, or linux cnc later. Here are a few examples.
- https://www.ebay.com/itm/worldwide-W...oAAOSwuzRXe1NK
- https://www.ebay.com/itm/FREE-SHIP-W....c100012.m1985
- https://www.ebay.com/itm/4-Axis-USB-...0AAOSwdKddjsuM
- NOTE: There is a lot of information on sizing nema steppers to gantry weight and there are a few good formulas. Essentially you need to get the IPM speed for the thickness of material you are cutting, while still maintaining adequate acceleration in g's for cnc plasma.
- Linux cnc with a Mesa 7I96 card, with their THC cad. This seems to be about the best option out there for use with Linux CNC. This also emcompasses option one and two below.
Last edited: