What's new

School shooters parents not liable

Santa Fe High School Civil Trial: Parents of student accused of killing 10 people found not liable​

Associated PressHOUSTON -
The parents of a former student accused of killing 10 people in a 2018 school shooting near Houston cannot be held responsible for what happened, a jury decided Monday.

The victims' lawsuit sought to hold Dimitrios Pagourtzis and his parents, Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Marie Kosmetatos, financially liable for the shooting at Santa Fe High School on May 18, 2018. The lawsuit alleged the parents failed to provide necessary support for their son's mental health and didn't do enough to prevent him from accessing their guns.

Authorities say Pagourtzis fatally shot eight students and two teachers. He was 17 years old at the time.

Pagourtzis, now 23, has been charged with capital murder, but the criminal case has been on hold since November 2019, when he was declared incompetent to stand trial. He is being held at a state mental health facility.

In April, Jennifer and James Crumbley were sentenced to at least 10 years in prison by a Michigan judge after becoming the first parents convicted in a U.S. mass school shooting. Pagourtzis' parents are not accused of any crime.

The lawsuit was filed by relatives of seven of the people killed and four of the 13 who were wounded in the Santa Fe attack.

News conference held following Santa Fe High School Civil Trial verdict​

A news conference was held on Monday night following the verdict in the Santa Fe High School Shooting Civil Trial where the parents of the accused shooter were found not liable in the shooting.
The attorney representing Pagourtzis told jurors that while his client did plan the shooting, he was never in control of his actions because of his severe mental illness.

Attorney Clint McGuire, representing some of the victims, said the parents knew their son was depressed, getting bad grades, isolating himself, and had taken weapons from their gun cabinet and safe. McGuire said Pagourtzis also wrote disturbing Facebook posts and ordered ammunition and other items online, such as a knife with a Nazi symbol and a T-shirt that said, "Born To Kill."

But Lori Laird, an attorney for Pagourtzis' parents, told jurors that the couple hadn't seen any red flags, knew nothing of his online purchases and didn't know any of their weapons were missing.

Both parents testified during the trial. Antonios Pagourtzis is retired but worked for years in ship maintenance and repair. Kosmetatos works as an executive assistant at an academic health science center in Galveston.

Kosmetatos told jurors that while her son became more introverted as he grew older, he was a bright and normal child with no significant issues. She acknowledged that he "wasn't himself" in the months leading up to the shooting but she had hoped it would pass.

Antonios Pagourtzis testified that he wasn't aware that his son was feeling rejected and ostracized at school, or that he might have been depressed.

The family stored firearms in a gun safe in the garage and a display cabinet in the living room. Dimitrios Pagourtzis used his mother's .38 caliber handgun and one of his father's shotguns during the shooting. Whether he got the weapons from the safe or cabinet, and where he found the keys, were among points debated during the trial.

"You can't secure anything 100%," Antonios Pagourtzis said.

Lucky Gunner, a Tennessee-based online retailer that sold Dimitrios Pagourtzis more than 100 rounds of ammunition without verifying his age, was a defendant in the lawsuit until last year, when it reached a settlement with the families.

Similar lawsuits have been filed following other mass shootings.

In 2022, a jury awarded over $200 million to the mother of one of four people killed in a shooting at a Waffle House in Nashville, Tennessee. The lawsuit was filed against the shooter and his father, who was accused of returning a rifle to his son before the shooting despite the son's mental health issues.

This is a breaking news story. We'll keep you up-to-date with the very latest.
 
Good. Liability should be limited to the party or parties who perpetrated the crime. I am not a fan of the pattern of pushing responsibility and liability to anyone and everyone. Sometimes bad things happen to good people. Sometimes people make dumb, stupid, fucked up, and or horrible decisions (see the overalls guy in the FAFO thread). It's not their parents, kids, dogs, or neighbor's fault that they did something.
 
Top Back Refresh