What's new

Political correctness comes to D&D

nahmus

Refugee from syrup
Joined
May 19, 2020
Member Number
121
Messages
756
Loc
East Coast
Not everything needs to be political.

'Dungeons & Dragons' Race Issues Have Deep Roots In The World Of Fantasy

Wizards of the Coast — the company behind the self-proclaimed “world’s greatest role-playing game,” “Dungeons & Dragons” — has committed to stressing diversity and removing racially problematic language from its product line, and fans are holding the company to account for its promises.

“Dungeons & Dragons,” commonly known as D&D, is a game in which a group of players creates characters, rolls dice and navigates a story overseen by a Dungeon Master. Originally created in 1974, the game issued a fifth edition in 2014 that became its most popular, especially after livestreaming platforms such as Twitch and shows such as Netflix’s “Stranger Things” introduced D&D to new audiences.

The game’s newfound popularity, however, has also invited critiques. Critics have pointed out that when creating a character, D&D players must choose a “race” — such as an elf, dwarf or gnome — and that this usage of the word is technically a misnomer.

5ef7807322000057013860d0.png

The D&D website invites players to
“‘Races’ in D&D are fundamentally different than our concept of ‘races’ in the real world,” medievalist Paul B. Sturtevant told HuffPost. “In D&D, races are based in deep biological differences, whereas we know that in the real world, race is a social construct based upon arbitrary and superficial differences. Using the word ‘race’ in the game where they really mean something more like ‘species’ promotes racist ideas.”





In a 2017 article, Sturtevant wrote that D&D’s idea of “race” is a holdover from “The Lord of the Rings” and author J.R.R. Tolkien, who “conflat[ed] race, culture and ability.”

In his novel, Tolkien outlined “the ‘racial’ characteristics of men, of dwarves, of elves, of orcs,” Sturtevant wrote, adding that Tolkien “created the blueprint for the troubling relationship between race and fantasy that would govern twentieth-century fantasies.”

This blueprint has been dissected by academics such as Helen Young of Australia’s Deakin University, who writes about fantasy and race. In a 2017 interview with Pacific Standard, Young argued that Tolkien’s idea of race as a hard reality rather than a social construct was inherently racist, and while Tolkien may not have harbored extremist views personally, his work was filled with examples of “good” races with European cultural traits and “bad” races described through “orientalist stereotypes.”

A look at D&D’s “Player’s Handbook” and online resource database offers a glimpse at how modern fantasy has internalized Tolkien’s ideas about race.

Elves, for instance, are described as good and often depicted as white, except for a subset of the species known as “drow,” who are ebony-skinned, “more often evil than not” and occasionally called “dark elves.”

Half-orcs are similarly described as having “a tendency towards chaos” and “the most accomplished half-orcs are those with enough self-control to get by in a civilized land.”

5ef781f922000057013860d1.jpeg

A half-orc, as depicted in the fifth edition of D&D ”Player's Handbook.” (Photo: HuffPost US)
In April, “orcs” began trending on social media after D&D players analyzed game guidelines to play as a full-blooded orc. They pointed out that the language describing orcs was laden with biological essentialism — the idea that certain traits are innate and unchangeable — and pointed to rules that gave orc characters lower intelligence, as well as sentences that said orcs could potentially be “domesticated” but would always have “blood lust flow[ing] just beneath the surface.”

James Mendez Hodes, a game designer and cultural consultant, wrote a comprehensive analysis of such language on his website. He pointed out that Tolkien, widely acknowledged as the creator of orcs, had initially described orcs in letters as “degraded and repulsive versions of the (to Europeans) least lovely Mongol-types.”

Subsequent fantasy media such as D&D have since described orcs with the same language used to denigrate nonwhite peoples of the real world, specifically those of Asian or Black ethnicity.

Cw blatant racism

I'm in genuine awe that this shit came out for THIS edition of D&D holy shit pic.twitter.com/RcAGY73BzZ
— Quinn W-W (ACAB) (@MonkipiQuinn) April 25, 2020

When Dungeons & Dragons led Tolkien's racist orcs to the US, they attacked new targets. Let's talk model minorities, dehumanization, uncomfortable half-orcs, poor excuses … and how gamers and designers can reclaim and rehabilitate orcs. https://t.co/rBgGU1XUI1
— James Mendez Hodes (@LulaVampiro) July 1, 2019



In a statement issued last week, Wizards of the Coast specifically addressed these concerns. The company said it would downplay biological essentialism in future releases and would also emphasize diverse hiring. The company added that one of its goals was to ensure that players would be able to “see positive reflections of themselves within our products, ... not just fantasy versions of northern Europeans.”

“Throughout the 50-year history of D&D, some of the peoples in the game — orcs and drow being two of the prime examples — have been characterized as monstrous and evil, using descriptions that are painfully reminiscent of how real-world ethnic groups have been and continue to be denigrated,” the statement said. “That’s just not right, and it’s not something we believe in. Despite our conscious efforts to the contrary, we have allowed some of those old descriptions to reappear in the game. We recognize that to live our values, we have to do an even better job in handling these issues. If we make mistakes, our priority is to make things right.”

Wizards of the Coast went on to highlight recent releases that painted a more nuanced version of orcs and drow and emphasized that the company had revised “racially insensitive” language in “Curse of Strahd,” a D&D book that was released in 2016, and “Tomb of Annihilation,” released in 2017. The books feature the Vistani — an ethnic group rooted in tropes of the Roma people — and Chult, a jungle region vaguely inspired by parts of Africa. Previous versions of the books referred to the Vistani as drunks and called Chult a “savage” and “exotic” land.

D&D fans on social media reacted to Wizards of the Coast’s statement with a mixed response. Some were in favor of the changes; others called them “political.” Multiple voices argued that promises of respecting diversity rang hollow as the company has had an alleged problem with hiring game designers of color in the past.


Sturtevant, Young and Mendez Hodes greeted the announcement with a combination of cautious optimism and skepticism.

“I think this shift is a good start, but they must go further,” Sturtevant said. “It’s a problem that [Wizards of the Coast] don’t seem to be getting rid of their use of the term ‘race’ altogether.”

Young echoed this sentiment. “Racism isn’t just negative stereotypes; it is also an underlying belief that a particular group of people have something inherently in common with each other and also that they are also inherently different from other groups,” she said.

“The change so that orcs and drow aren’t necessarily evil is superficial if that racist logic of inherent difference is still there,” Young said. She stressed that removing gameplay concepts such as orc characters starting with a lower intelligence would be a “much bigger step because it could remove the basic logic of race.” (Wizards of the Coast indicated in its statement that it would be moving towards this in future releases.)

“Hopefully the diverse hiring will be more than a token move,” Young added. “Employing people of color from different backgrounds and genuinely valuing everything that they bring will make the game more original, creative and interesting, as well as less racist.”

Mendez Hodes said it was vital to note that Wizards’ announcement followed years of advocacy and that many D&D fans of color who have criticized the game in the past were accused of “politicizing” it by other players who were unwilling to see characters such as orcs as anything more than disposable, evil enemies.

“For almost all of D&D’s history, systemically oppressive norms masquerading as harmless fun dominated both game content and community interactions,” Mendez Hodes told HuffPost. “What I most want changed are the [D&D] community’s oppressive power dynamics. Right now, being ourselves and expressing our preferences invites gatekeeping and vitriol from players whose fun relies on unexamined cruelty to a sapient Other.”

While it remains to be seen if Wizards of the Coast will truly make good on its aims, the company’s willingness to acknowledge its faults nevertheless gives Mendez Hodes hope.

“I know D&D’s creative team will err many more times on the way to fulfilling [its promises] — which is OK, if they acknowledge and iterate on their mistakes graciously rather than defensively,” he said. “To level up, D&D must highlight vulnerable players’ perspectives. Only when we may safely speak can they begin to listen.”
 

evernoob

Reactionary
Joined
May 21, 2020
Member Number
1083
Messages
4,600
Predicted many, many times. Expected, even.

Actually I'm surprised it made it this long.

Next will be LOTR, which is probably the greatest literary achievement of the 20th Century.

Thank god Jackson got the movies made before the fun really kicked in.
 

nahmus

Refugee from syrup
Joined
May 19, 2020
Member Number
121
Messages
756
Loc
East Coast
people will not be happy until we live in a beige soft world. No color, no excitement and no sharp edges.
 

rockota

white collar hillbilly
Joined
May 28, 2020
Member Number
1642
Messages
2,700
Young argued that Tolkien’s idea of race as a hard reality rather than a social construct was inherently racist,
< so, there are or are not different races? This is getting confusing.
 

Provience

Kill!
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Member Number
15
Messages
8,252
Loc
Gatesville, TX
< so, there are or are not different races? This is getting confusing.

control of language, we are not the human race, the social construct confounding race and ethnicity has replaced the notion of species. this is why the most ardent supporters of racism hate mixed relationships
 

rockota

white collar hillbilly
Joined
May 28, 2020
Member Number
1642
Messages
2,700
Not this week. But tune in again next week and it will all be different. Jeesh, try and keep up would ya! :laughing:


I just can't get my head around the circular statement... race doesn't exist, and to claim so is racist. if race doesn't exist, how can racism exist? how is the author defining racism if the root of the word no longer has meaning?

that's like defining widget by using the name of the widget as the definition.
 

gt1guy

Apparently a racist
CAL4
Joined
May 19, 2020
Member Number
241
Messages
1,682
Loc
New Iberia, La.
I just can't get my head around the circular statement... race doesn't exist, and to claim so is racist. if race doesn't exist, how can racism exist? how is the author defining racism if the root of the word no longer has meaning?

that's like defining widget by using the name of the widget as the definition.


If it confuses you, that means you're normal. The folks that it makes perfect sense, should be tossed in a wood chipper.
 

Provience

Kill!
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Member Number
15
Messages
8,252
Loc
Gatesville, TX
I just can't get my head around the circular statement... race doesn't exist, and to claim so is racist. if race doesn't exist, how can racism exist? how is the author defining racism if the root of the word no longer has meaning?

that's like defining widget by using the name of the widget as the definition.

in a sense, they are saying that racism only exists as a social construct to create a distinction among people so that an easily identified "lesser" group can be subjugated by a "majority" group. Race is not a term that can be used to identify types of things (in this case, fantasy shit that apparently can't play by fantasy rules) by over characteristics and groupings. the game and books consider Race as a benign term to generate boundaries, by putting the (fantasy) characters into boxes by race, they are then creating a social hierarchy that would not naturally (if it wasn't all fantasy) exist, as dark fairies could choose to be good if they wanted to (if they weren't fantasy) and hell, maybe even what the light fairies consider negative about the dark fairies could really be what the dark fairies consider good, so good and bad is subjective and there is no bad (in fucking fantasy)

hopefully that makes sense :flipoff2:
 

bobbywalter

Numbskull Member
Joined
May 21, 2020
Member Number
843
Messages
705
Loc
shithole under the fuhrer michigan
I just can't get my head around the circular statement... race doesn't exist, and to claim so is racist. if race doesn't exist, how can racism exist? how is the author defining racism if the root of the word no longer has meaning?

that's like defining widget by using the name of the widget as the definition.

Yeah......Flynn has that same problem with his case.....

Fairy tales are fickle mother fawkers.
 

evernoob

Reactionary
Joined
May 21, 2020
Member Number
1083
Messages
4,600
I just can't get my head around the circular statement... race doesn't exist, and to claim so is racist. if race doesn't exist, how can racism exist? how is the author defining racism if the root of the word no longer has meaning?

that's like defining widget by using the name of the widget as the definition.

This is a popular counter-argument and it's a bad and weak one.

They are saying Race doesn't exist, but people believe it does and are Racist.

It's the same thing as knowing that Cows aren't holy, but it doesn't matter because a Hindu thinks they are, and if you go to India and harm a cow, you could end up getting torn apart by a mob.

It's a cute thing to say on Conservative sites but it really doesn't mean much. They are accusing people of making it up then discriminating.

Their idea is that even though the skeletal morphology and skin color are different, inside we are all exactly the same.

This is a patent falsehood but it is accepted fact in Western society and it has the force of Law.
 

rockota

white collar hillbilly
Joined
May 28, 2020
Member Number
1642
Messages
2,700
This is a popular counter-argument and it's a bad and weak one.

They are saying Race doesn't exist, but people believe it does and are Racist.

The argument is still circular. If Race doesn't exist, then one cannot be a racist. It's a logical fallacy. If race doesn't exist, but someone believes it does, and therefore claims/can claim people are racist, that person is claiming something that doesn't exist... it's still illogical. Or if people who believe race exists are by definition racists, which may make some sense, then I would argue we're seeing a massive amount of racism from certain groups in the news who are founded on existence of race... not to mention, a lot of government programs are also racist.

If race is a social construct, then people self-identifying should be just a normal as people self-identifying their gender. And like gender, any reference to race should be removed from government forms.

Point is that it's circular. It's like describing an elephant by using the word elephant. But if it really doesn't exist, then lets take it the next logical step and eliminate any private/public programs that cater to non existent races.
 

evernoob

Reactionary
Joined
May 21, 2020
Member Number
1083
Messages
4,600
The argument is still circular. If Race doesn't exist, then one cannot be a racist. It's a logical fallacy.

No, it's not.

They say Race is a construct, and you are making distinction based on a construct.

The same way a Salem court would determine a woman was a Witch, then burn her.

Witches do not exist to us. It's crazy to make a distinction.

You and everyone else here has already accepted that Race doesn't matter by accepting a Black President without questioning whether his race has a bearing on his leadership. Now they've won.
 
Top