What's new
By:
Filters

Pelosi's husband attacked

ThePanzerFuhrer said:
It’s really hard to believe anything the news put out anymore.

What really happened lies somewhere between a maga super terrorist who was trying to kill the 3rd in line to the president, to a gay romance gone wrong:lmao:.

The media wonders why they have zero credibility now a days. What I wouldn’t give to have a news channel that was 100% facts no opinion, no bias, nothing but here is what happened you figure it out for yourself.
Click to expand...
And wild speculation by all parties doesn't help either.
 
MSN was on when I turned on the TV they are blaming musk and Twitter
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, you'd rather go running off and believe all the stupid speculations ? How stupid.
Click to expand...
No, SDCJ. It's not always one extreme or the other. There is a middle ground, and it's using your own personal judgement and experience to make reasonable assumptions based on the evidence at hand so far.

Most people are capable of doing this. It doesn't have to be very specific or definitive, but most of can draw generalized conclusions by using our brains. Others, like you, simply pause your brain entirely for the duration until a conclusion is handed to you on a silver platter or a youtube video.


So what do we have here as evidence that I mentioned above?

#1: He was allowed to take a bathroom break during the "attack". Now think for yourself, is it more than 50% likely that this was actually not an attack taking place at this time?
#2: This took place after 2am, after the bars close, and no security alarm or guards were activated. Is it more than 50% likely that this guy was allowed into the home rather than break in?
#3: MSM moved on the right wing theory quickly, based on 2 brand new websites, that were deleted 2 days after being created. Is it more than 50% likely that these sites and that claim are bullshit?

If you agree with the above, you are a reasonable person. Should it happen later on that it turns out you were wrong, there's no egg on your face for it because you were going with preponderance of the evidence at hand. Besides, you and I are not as important as you seem to think. You see, you and I are no judge or jury, so our speculation at this point has no consequences.

There. So speculate away, reasonable man.
 
Yota Up said:
No, SDCJ. It's not always one extreme or the other. There is a middle ground, and it's using your own personal judgement and experience to make reasonable assumptions based on the evidence at hand so far.

Most people are capable of doing this. It doesn't have to be very specific or definitive, but most of can draw generalized conclusions by using our brains. Others, like you, simply pause your brain entirely for the duration until a conclusion is handed to you on a silver platter or a youtube video.


So what do we have here as evidence that I mentioned above?

#1: He was allowed to take a bathroom break during the "attack". Now think for yourself, is it more than 50% likely that this was actually not an attack taking place at this time?
#2: This took place after 2am, after the bars close, and no security alarm or guards were activated. Is it more than 50% likely that this guy was allowed into the home rather than break in?
#3: MSM moved on the right wing theory quickly, based on 2 brand new websites, that were deleted 2 days after being created. Is it more than 50% likely that these sites and that claim are bullshit?

If you agree with the above, you are a reasonable person. Should it happen later on that it turns out you were wrong, there's no egg on your face for it because you were going with preponderance of the evidence at hand. Besides, you and I are not as important as you seem to think. You see, you and I are no judge or jury, so our speculation at this point has no consequences.

There. So speculate away, reasonable man.
Click to expand...

You forgot Pauls statement on the 911 call that the individual in his house was a friend. Any reasonable person would use all of that information to draw a conclusion from the evidence provided. I mean jeez who'd a thunk that the same preponderance of evidence used in court wouldnt be good enough for SandyVJ.
 
1667219690785.png
 
SLOWPOKE693 said:
Who the fuck is going to tell us the real truth?

Who would you consider a credible source?

Fuck off with your bullshit.

:flipoff2:
Click to expand...
So, you'll believe all the idiot wild assed speculation from people here who have zero facts and are cherry picking what they already believe
from the MSM ? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, you'll believe all the idiot wild assed speculation from people here who have zero facts and are cherry picking what they already believe
from the MSM ? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
Click to expand...
I'd believe their wild ass speculation before I trusted a single word the media told me about "the incident."

Answer my question fuckstick.....
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, you'll believe all the idiot wild assed speculation from people here who have zero facts and are cherry picking what they already believe
from the MSM ? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
Click to expand...
That wild ass speculation is coming from the police press release and from the 911 dispatch press release. So if we cant take that as factual reporting what can we trust?
 
DWT said:
He used code words while on the phone with 911 eh? He called the dude a friend, my ex wife once told me after she left she'd made some friends which I knew were random dating site guys she'd pick a different one every night to fuck. So if he was talking in code it makes a whole lot of sense how he got through security and ended up in his underwear. :laughing:
Click to expand...

I'd like to know how all of the potential 911 operators had been trained in detecting said code....
 
rockota said:
I'd like to know how all of the potential 911 operators had been trained in detecting said code....
Click to expand...
:laughing: no shit, they get code words but basic English befuddles many. :homer:


Radio a bit ago mentioned the guy had zip ties and a hit list on his person. Rrrrrrrrtiiiiight. :lmao:
 
Last edited:
rockota said:
I'd like to know how all of the potential 911 operators had been trained in detecting said code....
Click to expand...
It was a turn of phrase reported by the 911 operator. I think they meant he was trying to relay what was going on without Depape knowing he was talking to the 911 operator. Not using actual code words.
 
Stuck said:
That wild ass speculation is coming from the police press release and from the 911 dispatch press release. So if we cant take that as factual reporting what can we trust?
Click to expand...
And now silence or I am choosing to wait till they tell us what we need to know. Because government is always right in the end.
 
So, all the speculation about it being a "gay sex gone wrong" came from the 911 operator? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

I will say there's a whole lot about this that we don't know, but uninformed people here filling in the blanks is hilarious. :lmao:
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, all the speculation about it being a "gay sex gone wrong" came from the 911 operator? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

I will say there's a whole lot about this that we don't know, but uninformed people here filling in the blanks is hilarious. :lmao:
Click to expand...


there being blanks exactly means uninformed. the vast majority of life lives in the blanks and people, well people who actually use their brains, accurately infer based on information missing, vs information spoon-fed. both can be lies but spoon-fed lies doesn't answer anything like lies of omission do when one uses critical thinking skills
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, all the speculation about it being a "gay sex gone wrong" came from the 911 operator? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

I will say there's a whole lot about this that we don't know, but uninformed people here filling in the blanks is hilarious. :lmao:
Click to expand...
Just as hilarious as how much typing you do to say you have no opinions on the subject and that anyone who does is an idiot :homer::lmao::flipoff2:
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, you'd rather go running off and believe all the stupid speculations ? How stupid.
Click to expand...
I like how you start a tread on a public forum that you know will lead to conversion and plenty of speculation. Then you call people stupid for speculating.

You’re a miserable little man with a horrible inferiority complex.
 
First I’ve heard of this. The common diversion tactics have been used up I suppose.
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
So, all the speculation about it being a "gay sex gone wrong" came from the 911 operator? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

I will say there's a whole lot about this that we don't know, but uninformed people here filling in the blanks is hilarious. :lmao:
Click to expand...
No dumbass, my wild ass speculation about it being something more than a breakin.
 
bunk said:
First I’ve heard of this. The common diversion tactics have been used up I suppose.
Click to expand...
You were probably too busy living life and not on a forum, wasting your life away like a loser. Oh wait.

You must be Sdcj’s alter ego, sir hypocrite:lmao:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh