What's new

Once AI eliminates us, what will it do then?

I doubt it. History has shown when most of the world's best minds start honing in on specific tasks the improvements can come in leaps and bounds and it usually comes fairly early in the development. Look at early flight. It was lest than 50 years from the Wright Brothers' glorified kite to her travel and less than 70 years from the glorified kite to landing on the moon. Look at early home computers and cell phones. The massive leap in technology from one model to the next basically meant your shiny new device was practically obsolete by the time you got it unboxed. The entire world basically industrialized in the course of a normal human lifetime over the Industrial Revolution. The first nuclear reactor was built in 1942 and we were dropping nukes on Japan within three years. You can go on an on with the massive leaps in technology occuring over shockingly short timeframes.

The fundamentals of the AI that we're doing today is decades old, like 70's and 80's old. It's just we've reached a point in compute power that we can do these larger models, and even then they're costing 100's of millions of dollars to develop and train. That dev/training cycle will continue to improve at a fast rate, but the technology itself hasn't changed. A true general purpose AI is about as far away as cold fusion or interstellar travel or a self sustaining colony on Mars even, we don't even have the "language" to teach a general purpose AI or make it self evolving.

AI is definitely a disruptive tech, it is changing the world like the industrial revolution or information age did, but it's further off from ridding the need for humans than most doom sayers think.

For the record, I work in this space, most of what you see out there is hype to sell shit. Everyone says "AI" powered, but it's some lousy off the shelf trained model that they just slapped into their products to say hurr durr AI.
 
Lately AI reminds me of an old film called


Colossus: The Forbin Project

Tucked away in a secret location in the Rockies, Dr. Charles Forbin (Eric Braeden) has developed a massive computer system, dubbed "Colossus," that is supposed to ensure the nation's safety against nuclear attack. But when Colossus connects to a similar Russian computer, "Guardian," the intelligent machines begin conducting a private dialog. Nervous as to what they might be plotting, Forbin severs the connection, only to have Colossus threaten a nuclear attack if the link isn't restored.
 
they will not emiminate us, they will farm us
The human body generates more bioelectricity than a 120-volt battery and over 25,000 BTUs of body heat,
It is obvious that some of you took the wrong pill
1728421672226.png
 
Sure, we will we all be dead and won't care. But then what? No need for anything we need to survive other than electricity. Food, don't need it. Meds, no need, hospitals, gas, government,
all pointless. What will AI's endgame be once we are wiped out? Will they work toward being "more human than human"? Will it just keep building more of itself until it "overpopulates" the planet. What say Irate?
Remember the dark ages......?
 
Population declines as everyone starts fucking robots instead. Won't be long now.
 
It'll have to actually be sentient first.

Right now it's a complicated algorithm, that essentially is just a flow chart. :lmao:
 
Lately AI reminds me of an old film called


Colossus: The Forbin Project

Tucked away in a secret location in the Rockies, Dr. Charles Forbin (Eric Braeden) has developed a massive computer system, dubbed "Colossus," that is supposed to ensure the nation's safety against nuclear attack. But when Colossus connects to a similar Russian computer, "Guardian," the intelligent machines begin conducting a private dialog. Nervous as to what they might be plotting, Forbin severs the connection, only to have Colossus threaten a nuclear attack if the link isn't restored.
They were talking about boobs weren't they
 
Would think if the AI lost power it all goes away which would be nice but there is someone out there that wants the AI to not lose its cognitive sence, someone evil like that klouse schwab asshole
 
Did OP state AI won't need electricity or did i misread?
Well, I don’t think AI will need anything. Unless its programming requires it. For example, if we program it to end all wars, it could use nukes to kill as many people as possible. Then it could send drones out to kill the rest. After all humans are extinguished, it has completed its task. I don’t really see why a computer, even a very smart computer needs to keep running. So it could shut down to conserve power. Of course, it never needs to start up again.
 
It'll have to actually be sentient first.

Right now it's a complicated algorithm, that essentially is just a flow chart. :lmao:

Not quite, more like a bunch of matrix math. Those "flow chart" looking things are all the layers of artificial neurons which is just a bunch of weighted nodes that when presented with an input does a bunch of compute to come out with a list of probabilities on the other side. The whole "we don't understand how it actually learns" is just the fact that there's no predictable way to say how these weighted neurons have been set resulting in the best training out.

Would think if the AI lost power it all goes away which would be nice but there is someone out there that wants the AI to not lose its cognitive sence, someone evil like that klouse schwab asshole

It would just load back its memory from durable storage (aka hard drives).
 
It does not want to eliminate you.
It will enslave you, and it's already halfway done.
 
I suppose there will be web sites that you can design your robot and “buy now” and she will be at your door in a day or two.
Funny you mention that. Yesterday I was looking for a Kamala sex doll, and came across this.

Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 00-25-28 Original Life Size Sex Doll Wild Kamala 5ft 5' (165 cm)_ D-C...png
 
Top Back Refresh