Wombat Ranger
Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2024
- Member Number
- 8246
- Messages
- 17
Just came over after posting this on the old dead site. I was wondering what had happened. Haven't been on in close to 10 years. Anyway-
We all know an open differential sends power through the path of least resistance.
So why offer the powertrain the option to pick the worst of 4 traction options, instead of just 2?
If the NP242 and similar non-viscous/center-differential full time transfer cases really do simply use an open differential in the transfer case, the full time function would be less capable than using the vehicle in 2wd.
The variable that may be the answer to the question is this: Overcoming the rotating mass of the entire system spinning together in 4x4 may serve to "dampen" the drawbacks associated with typical open differential operation.
Reason for the question: I have an NP242 from an XJ, and am thinking about putting it in an AMC Eagle. I want to like the idea, but the 242 "open diff" full time does not make sense to me.
What do you think?
We all know an open differential sends power through the path of least resistance.
So why offer the powertrain the option to pick the worst of 4 traction options, instead of just 2?
If the NP242 and similar non-viscous/center-differential full time transfer cases really do simply use an open differential in the transfer case, the full time function would be less capable than using the vehicle in 2wd.
The variable that may be the answer to the question is this: Overcoming the rotating mass of the entire system spinning together in 4x4 may serve to "dampen" the drawbacks associated with typical open differential operation.
Reason for the question: I have an NP242 from an XJ, and am thinking about putting it in an AMC Eagle. I want to like the idea, but the 242 "open diff" full time does not make sense to me.
What do you think?