What's new

MASS DENIAL OF FORM 1'S?

6gun

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Member Number
1975
Messages
64
Reading on the NFA thread on Reddit(I know) there seems to be a mass denial of Form 1's that went out today. NFAGUNTRUST forum is also talking about it with their people just as puzzled as everyone else. WTF?
 
 
My buddy just received this gem...

Dear eForm 1 Applicant, As part of the application process, NFA Division must confirm that the making or possession of a firearm would not place the applicant in violation of law. You previously received notification from NFA Division that your Form 1 application to make and register a silencer was disapproved because the part that you intend to use to make the silencer already meets the NFA’s definition of “silencer” and was not transferred and registered to you in compliance with the NFA. As more fully explained below, a Form 1 application to make and register a silencer cannot lawfully be approved if the maker will make the silencer with parts that are themselves classified as silencers under federal law and the parts were not transferred to the maker in compliance with the tax, transfer, and registration requirements of the NFA.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(24), 27 CFR 478.11, and 27 CFR 479.11, the terms “firearm silencer” and “firearm muffler” mean “any device for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm, including any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for use in assembling or fabricating a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, and any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.”

Accordingly, a device or part that falls under the definition of “firearm silencer” and “firearm muffler” are each considered a “firearm” subject to the provisions of the Gun Control Act (GCA) and the National Firearms Act (NFA). See 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3); 26 U.S.C. 5845(a)(7). Transferring a silencer in compliance with the NFA requires the transferor pay a $200.00 transfer tax and receive an approved ATF Form 4, Application for Transfer and Registration of Firearm, before transferring the silencer to the transferee. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 5811; 5812. Similarly, making a silencer in compliance with the NFA requires the maker pay a $200.00 making tax and receive an approved ATF Form 1, Application to Make and Register a Firearm, before the maker may make the silencer identified on the Form 1. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 5821; 5822. An approved Form 1, Application to Make and Register a Firearm, authorizes the maker to make the silencer identified on the Form 1 application. The maker must certify on the Form 1 application under penalties of perjury that the maker is the person who will make the silencer. An approved Form 1 does not authorize any person to manufacture the silencer on behalf of the Form 1 maker. An approved Form 1 does not authorize the transfer of a silencer to the Form 1 maker. Further, an approved Form 1 does not legitimize the prior transfer of a silencer that did not comply with the tax, transfer, and registration requirements of the NFA. It is a violation of the NFA for a person to possess a firearm that is not registered to that person. See 26 U.S.C. 5861(d). Therefore, you have the following options for the device and/or part you intended to use to make the silencer identified on your disapproved Form 1 application: Abandon each device and/or part to your local ATF Field Office. You may use the following link to locate your closest ATF Field Office: https://www.atf.gov/contact/local-atf-offices.
Destroy each device and/or part. The following link provides acceptable methods of destruction: https://www.atf.gov/file/126786/download. Further questions regarding appropriate destruction methods may be directed to: [email protected]. ATF is actively working to issue a refund of the $200.00 making tax payment. If you have additional questions, please direct your inquiries to: [email protected].

So each baffle, endcap, tube, etc is a Form 1 suppressor? Maybe each one is worth like... $50 at a buyback program? :shaking::flipoff:
 

Twenty Six Senators Sign Letter to ATF​

WASHINGTON, DC - On Thursday, March 17th, Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) and 25 of his Senate colleagues sent a letter to ATF regarding the Bureau’s blatant overstep of authority with regards to their recent Form 1 denials.

House Judiciary Committee members Andy Biggs (AZ-5) and Ranking Member Jim Jordan (OH-4) have a similar letter circulating in the House. The deadline to sign on is TODAY.

The American Suppressor Association worked alongside Sen. Daines’ staff, the National Rifle Association, and the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition in support of the letter. These efforts were directly supported by the nearly 14,000 people who have contacted their legislators through ASA’s legislative contact form in the past two weeks.

We need your help to keep the pressure up on Congress and get as many signatories before the House letter is sent to ATF & DOJ!
 
My buddy just received this gem...



So each baffle, endcap, tube, etc is a Form 1 suppressor? Maybe each one is worth like... $50 at a buyback program? :shaking::flipoff:
A ten stamp can. Hilarious.
I have to admit I’m glad to see congress critters taking action on form 1 issues when there’s no real corporate money involved. Really this bs benefits the manufacturers, who I’m sure are making nice margins on form 4 cans.
 
WASHINGTON, DC - Today, 142 House Republicans sent a letter to ATF regarding the Bureau’s blatant overstep of authority with regards to their recent Form 1 denials. Spearheaded by House Judiciary Committee members Andy Biggs (AZ-5) and Ranking Member Jim Jordan (OH-4), it is essentially a companion to the letter Sen. Steve Daines and 25 of his Senate colleagues sent yesterday.

“The ATF continues to infringe on the constitutional liberties of law-abiding Americans. This has gone long enough,” said Congressman Andy Biggs. “ATF is ignoring years of precedent to restrict individuals’ ability to make their own silencers. I’ve heard from my constituents how this arbitrary change is negatively impacting them. This is unacceptable. The ATF is overstepping its authority and it must explain its actions to Congress and the American people.”

“President Biden and his radical Democrat allies have continuously attacked our most fundamental liberties. Now, the Biden ATF is attempting to further restrict the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens. Americans have had enough and deserve to know why the Biden Administration believes that the mere possession of otherwise legal items are now considered to be violations of federal law
,” said Ranking Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary Jim Jordan (OH-4).
 
Top Back Refresh