What's new
By:
Filters

Jared Bossly / Summit Carbon solutions

alarratt

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2021
Member Number
4442
Messages
3
Are my search skills garbage, or has nobody brought this up here?

Sounds like someone is in need of a dozer.

www.dakotanewsnow.com

Summit Carbon Solutions surveyors damage farmer’s crops

A recent ruling made by a Brown County judge allows Summit Carbon Solutions to survey private land without permission from landowners, but one farmer was left with damaged crops after survey work took place on his property.
www.dakotanewsnow.com www.dakotanewsnow.com
 
They're really busy buying easements in Iowa too ... haven't heard of wayward surveyors.

Midwest carbon dioxide pipelines— what we know and the questions that remain

Pipeline proposals can be contentious when economic, environmental, and landowner interests are at odds. With two proposed pipelines intended to facilitate carbon capture and storage across the upper Midwest, it is important there is an understanding of the facts, as well as the relevant...
www.cfra.org www.cfra.org
 
Dam, SD has got a hot gun toting, anti mask gov. And fuck Summit Carbon with a rusty blender.
 
That article is misleading, a surveyor walking around taking shots is one thing. A fucking drill rig taking geotechnical soil samples?!

How is either case not trespassing? The land hasn't been seized by eminent domain the crown yet, so how can this be legal?
 
Keep sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere, you’ll solve ALL the problems soon enough
 
Whats ironic about carbon capture is they wouldn't allow keystone pipeline (Saudis paid protesters) but a more than happy to confiscate land to put in a unproven technology probably no better than windmils.

Don Quijote would be proud.

news.bloomberglaw.com

Biggest-Ever Carbon Capture Project Facing Midwest Opposition

What’s touted as the world’s largest carbon capture and sequestration project is facing headwinds from farmers and environmentalists even as John Deere & Co. and New York financiers are investing in the $4.5 billion endeavor.
news.bloomberglaw.com news.bloomberglaw.com
 
As is normal the real story is somewhere in-between what either party is putting forward. I would bet plenty of others in his area are not having the same issues as this guy, who is to really blame for that is likely a long story. Touchy subject. These carbon sequestration projects are going to support farmers for higher crop prices using bs green requirements. I think some of you are mistaken in what side of the isle is backing them.
 
RusM said:
That article is misleading, a surveyor walking around taking shots is one thing. A fucking drill rig taking geotechnical soil samples?!

How is either case not trespassing? The land hasn't been seized by eminent domain the crown yet, so how can this be legal?
Click to expand...
Kinda what I was thinking. Surveying is one thing, geotechnical exploration is another. I'm not read up on that particular states laws but there appears to be some kind of shenanigans.

1. Actual surveying doesn't require ROW or an easement. Its simple measuring and the surveyor has the right to be out there ie..he's not trespassing. Pending state laws anyway. Missouri its not trespassing. Anyhow, damage to property during surveying is not ok. They would be responsible for the damage, again assuming no ROW or easement.

2. Geotechnical drilling has to be done on the property that is currently under ROW or an easement. If they were out there drilling then either they ARE Trespassing and damaged his property or they AREN'T trespassing and damaged vegetation in the ROW/Easement.

if there's ROW or an easement, then the farmer should have known better to put his crops in an area where he knew work was going to be done. He would have immediately been tipped off by the utility locate flags prior to any drilling occurring. If there's no ROW or an easement, then property owner has a case for damages.

There doesn't appear to be any mention of ROW or easements, just a future pipeline. If they were taking property for an easement, farmer would have been contacted to purchase the land for ROW/Easement or notified regarding taking of land for ROW/Easement via Condemnation or Eminent domain. Either way, the land owner would have been contacted long before any work actually took place and that includes drilling.

Again, state law (not all states are the same) traditionally dictates that all taking of land must follow this order:

  1. Negotiated sale first. Taker and property owner get appraisals of land to be taken. Then direct negotiation based on appraisals. (lawyers talk to each other)
  2. Arbitration if 2 sides cannot agree on property worth. (lawyers talk to arbiter, judge, or arbitration panel)
  3. Federal/State/County/City (who ever the project is for) must either condemn or seek eminent domain. To which the land owner would still be compensated for the property taken. Just much cheaper than what they probably wanted for it.
 
ApeEater said:
cliff's notes?
Click to expand...
Iowa state Gov. gave private companys the right to use E.D. to take farm land for thier pipe line, the people are fighting back.
CO2 is deadly at the pressures they are using. There have been several ruptures in those lines already put in, people have died, or have had their health affacted, along with loosing produtive land.
 
Norm said:
Pumping C02 into the ground to change the weather is gay and retarded in the first place. Taking peoples land to do it is even more gay and retarded,
Click to expand...
Near the end of the video Kennedy speculates that the CO2 will be pumped underground to help the oil and gas industry in the Dakotas to get more oli out of the shale formations
 
bigun said:
Near the end of the video Kennedy speculates that the CO2 will be pumped underground to help the oil and gas industry in the Dakotas to get more oli out of the shale formations
Click to expand...
I used to work for a company that did that, Chaparral Energy. They use CO2 to essentially wash the inside of the formations and push all the residual oil out through a second well. Then they recapture the CO2 and repeat the process.

Yes, they use CO2 pipelines to transport most of the gas. This isn't CO2 capture for carbon credits, this is oil and gas companies getting every last drop of oil out of previously abandoned formations.
 
ApeEater said:
I used to work for a company that did that, Chaparral Energy. They use CO2 to essentially wash the inside of the formations and push all the residual oil out through a second well. Then they recapture the CO2 and repeat the process.

Yes, they use CO2 pipelines to transport most of the gas. This isn't CO2 capture for carbon credits, this is oil and gas companies getting every last drop of oil out of previously abandoned formations.
Click to expand...
Being paid for by us through the Biden administrations "Green Deal"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh