What's new

Hard hats

Amazing how much of a bunch of stockholm syndrome riddled pussies you guys have become. There's cases where a chin strap would matter and there's cases where it won't and if you're not exposed to the former then fuck it.
 
The dumber the safety bullshit gets the more I like my office job. :laughing:
We did shots with our intern during our 10am staff meeting last Friday.

Takes a certain level of mental retardation to think that being able to chest thump about not working in an office somehow makes up for replacing that with safety bullshit. So I guess the chin strap helmets do kinda make sense in that regard. :laughing:
 
The number of people here defending dumb safety bullshit that doesn't make sense in a lot of the situations in which it's implemented as "rules are rule" and similar is too damn high.

Y'all are soft.

I personally think the chin strap helmets are a good thing because I hate that the old style helmets were prone to falling off if you were crawling around doing shit but it's the principal of the matter and the guys who mostly stand around or operate things that drive should be pissed off over the dumb rule.
 
The number of people here defending dumb safety bullshit that doesn't make sense in a lot of the situations in which it's implemented as "rules are rule" and similar is too damn high.

Y'all are soft.

I personally think the chin strap helmets are a good thing but it's the principal of the matter.
So, turn down multi-million dollar contracts over hardhat chin straps. Got it. I'd like to subscribe to your business management newsletter please.
 
So, turn down multi-million dollar contracts over hardhat chin straps. Got it.
That's a painfully fucking obvious strawman. You fixing to move to the southwest? :shaking:

When you see the safety person's boss tell them their safety person is an ass and costing them money for no benefit. Throw a line item on the bill.

Don't just bend over and take dumb management decisions quietly.
 
That's a painfully fucking obvious strawman. You fixing to move to the southwest? :shaking:

When you see the safety person's boss tell them their safety person is an ass and costing them money for no benefit. Throw a line item on the bill.

Don't just bend over and take dumb management decisions quietly.
You're out of your wheelhouse bud.
 
I have a team of programmers/technicians that work for me on commercial construction sites. We've had generals require gloves on site, even when we are working on computers. The level of stupidity with some of this safety BS is unreal.

I started my career in construction in safety. I made it less than a year before becoming disenfranchised after realizing that no one really cares about safety, they just care about shifting liability. We had a guy lose part of an arm on an industrial site and within the matter of hours, a whole team of lawyers was involved. I promptly left the safety sector to go into management. It was a great move that I am glad I made. I've never looked back.
 
That's a painfully fucking obvious strawman. You fixing to move to the southwest? :shaking:

When you see the safety person's boss tell them their safety person is an ass and costing them money for no benefit. Throw a line item on the bill.

Don't just bend over and take dumb management decisions quietly.
The corporate GCs don't give two shits about your opinion on their safety requirements. The shit you're suggesting doesn't work in construction anymore unless you're doing low end tract home bullshit or working for homeowners.

No one here is defending this nonsense. Just recognizing the reality that there's no fighting it. I can grandstand all I want, it just means I'll stop getting work and someone else will step right in to get it.
 
That's a painfully fucking obvious strawman. You fixing to move to the southwest? :shaking:

When you see the safety person's boss tell them their safety person is an ass and costing them money for no benefit. Throw a line item on the bill.

Don't just bend over and take dumb management decisions quietly.
The issue is it's a law from bureaucrats, not a cooked up safety rule by some company cube crawlers. Add to that a vast majority of the projects these dudes are working on are probably funded by .gov welfare money, they have to abide by those rules as that's how the game is played. Whenever I start getting ear fulls from managers about dumbass OSHA laws, I just tell them to write their congressman, or send me an email that you are refusing to abide by this and I'll save that and we move onto the next topic. So glad I'm not in construction safety as it seems like nothing but a PPE and toolbox talk circle jerk.
 
no one really cares about safety, they just care about shifting liability.

DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER

Create so many rules they can't all be followed all the time and you always have a card up your sleeve to shift the blame when someone gets hurt.

And the business owners and supervisors are happy to go along with it because it gives them the power of arbitrary enforcement.
 
The issue is it's a law from bureaucrats, not a cooked up safety rule by some company cube crawlers. Add to that a vast majority of the projects these dudes are working on are probably funded by .gov welfare money, they have to abide by those rules as that's how the game is played. Whenever I start getting ear fulls from managers about dumbass OSHA laws, I just tell them to write their congressman, or send me an email that you are refusing to abide by this and I'll save that and we move onto the next topic. So glad I'm not in construction safety as it seems like nothing but a PPE and toolbox talk circle jerk.
Yeah I know. The responsibility is just so far removed and so diffuse people who make bad decisions never feel pain from it. :shaking:
 
You are dealing with regulatory agencies, when are they never not adding more bullshit. The more bullshit they add the more power and perceived importance they obtain.
 
DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER

Create so many rules they can't all be followed all the time and you always have a card up your sleeve to shift the blame when someone gets hurt.

And the business owners and supervisors are happy to go along with it because it gives them the power of arbitrary enforcement.
Go do another shot with the intern, what that really means is that it shifts liability off the worker and onto the management team/business owners for employee fuck ups and injuries, shit rolls right back downhill onto the supervisors.
 
Go do another shot with the intern, what that really means is that it shifts liability off the worker and onto the management team/business owners for employee fuck ups and injuries, shit rolls right back downhill onto the supervisors.
This is the part where I tell you to fuck off to the desert. :flipoff2:

I deal with this sort of human factors shit in my day job (though not in a safety context). Just with money and computer systems instead of Pablo losing a hand. :laughing:

By adopting BS policies that take agency and discretion away from the workers management (either on or off site) is taking on responsibility for making sure those policies are fit for their purpose, complied with and what happens when everyone does shit right and shit fucks off anyway. And they're reducing the productive capacity of the workers when shit goes right.

On the other hand, it does really give supervisors a lot of discretion to frame people or shift the focus away from "I suck and what we're doing is fundamentally risky" to "we'll just train people better" when shit does go wrong.

At the end of the day the owners and top managers are ultimately responsible or liable for almost everything to an extent so it's kind of a wash. You either waste money investing in preventing mishaps or you invest money in paying for the results of the mishaps.

INB4 a real desert dweller shows up to willfully misunderstand me. :flipoff2:
 
This is the part where I tell you to fuck off to the desert. :flipoff2:

I deal with this sort of human factors shit in my day job (though not in a safety context). Just with money and computer systems instead of Pablo losing a hand. :laughing:

By adopting BS policies that take agency and discretion away from the workers management (either on or off site) is taking on responsibility for making sure those policies are fit for their purpose, complied with and what happens when everyone does shit right and shit fucks off anyway.

On the other hand, it does really give supervisors a lot of discretion to frame people or shift the focus away from "I suck and what we're doing is fundamentally risky" to "we'll just train people better" when shit does happen.

At the end of the day the owners and top managers are ultimately responsible or liable for almost everything to an extent so it's kind of a wash. You either waste money investing in preventing mishaps or you invest money in paying for the results of the mishaps. I think at the end of the day it's mostly a wash as long as the policies aren't stupid as fuck.

INB4 a real desert dweller shows up to willfully misunderstand me. :flipoff2:
Apples and oranges. Again, you are out of your wheelhouse on this one.
 
This is the part where I tell you to fuck off to the desert.

I deal with this sort of human factors shit in my day job (though not in a safety context).

By adopting BS policies that take agency and discretion away from the workers management (either on or off site) is taking on responsibility for making sure those policies are fit for their purpose, complied with and what happens when everyone does shit right and shit fucks off anyway.

On the other hand, it does really give supervisors a lot of discretion to frame people or shift the focus away from "I suck and what we're doing is fundamentally risky" to "we'll just train people better" when shit does happen.

At the end of the day the owners and top managers are ultimately responsible or liable for almost everything to an extent so it's kind of a wash. You either waste money investing in preventing mishaps or you invest money in paying for the results of the mishaps.

INB4 a real desert dweller shows up to willfully misunderstand me. :flipoff2:
Except that's not how OSHA and most state WC programs see it. Yes the head of the facility is ultimately responsible, but they will gladly throw the direct supervisor under the bus. The gay part about OSHA is they will still fine you and hold you responsible if you are following all their laws and someone dies.
 
Except that's not how OSHA and most state WC programs see it. Yes the head of the facility is ultimately responsible, but they will gladly throw the direct supervisor under the bus.
The lowest level person who provably knew or was responsible for knowing they were violating a bureaucracy's rule is just about always the one who takes the fall.

I get that shit gets way more complex and pinning liability is a way higher priority when you've got a bajillion contractor subcontractor relationships in one place.

Man, the more I think about it the more I just hate every party involved. :laughing:
 
Curious., it's been a few years for me so I don't know.

Do you also have to wear a cup now days?
 
The lowest level person who provably knew or was responsible for knowing they were violating a bureaucracy's rule is just about always the one who takes the fall.

I get that shit gets way more complex and pinning liability is a way higher priority when you've got a bajillion contractor subcontractor relationships in one place.

Man, the more I think about it the more I just hate every party involved. :laughing:
At the end of the day the workforce anger over dumb safety rules needs to be directed at two entities: unions who lobby for this shit, and personal injury attorneys. OSHA states their rules really don't protect anyone as you can still injure and kill people following them, and they will still fine you. Compared to the private trade groups (NFPA, ansi, etc) they really are pretty weak and outdated anyway.
 
The corporate GCs don't give two shits about your opinion on their safety requirements. The shit you're suggesting doesn't work in construction anymore unless you're doing low end tract home bullshit or working for homeowners.

No one here is defending this nonsense. Just recognizing the reality that there's no fighting it. I can grandstand all I want, it just means I'll stop getting work and someone else will step right in to get it.
100%

I work with most of these GCs and they do not give 2 fucks about some subcontractor making a stand about PPE, they will move on to the next guy or open up a subsidiary to self perform the scope and steal your employees.

 
100%

I work with most of these GCs and they do not give 2 fucks about some subcontractor making a stand about PPE, they will move on to the next guy or open up a subsidiary to self perform the scope and steal your employees.


Man, it's a list of all the PITA GCs. Have also worked directly for one of them in the top 5 once upon a time. I really enjoy the size of company I am in now. We are hovering around the 550 employee mark with lots of room to grow and a steady growth track record.
 
Man, it's a list of all the PITA GCs. Have also worked directly for one of them in the top 5 once upon a time. I really enjoy the size of company I am in now. We are hovering around the 550 employee mark with lots of room to grow and a steady growth track record.
No shit, it's basically a list from 1-50 of clients Ranked by PITA.:lmao:

These guys have legal departments bigger than my entire company.
 
The issue is it's a law from bureaucrats, not a cooked up safety rule by some company cube crawlers. Add to that a vast majority of the projects these dudes are working on are probably funded by .gov welfare money, they have to abide by those rules as that's how the game is played. Whenever I start getting ear fulls from managers about dumbass OSHA laws, I just tell them to write their congressman, or send me an email that you are refusing to abide by this and I'll save that and we move onto the next topic. So glad I'm not in construction safety as it seems like nothing but a PPE and toolbox talk circle jerk.
It's not just the bureaucrats but the insurance companies enforcing this shit as well.
 
Man, it's a list of all the PITA GCs. Have also worked directly for one of them in the top 5 once upon a time. I really enjoy the size of company I am in now. We are hovering around the 550 employee mark with lots of room to grow and a steady growth track record.
That list is basically our do not bid list. :laughing:

Company I was bitching about before is on that list and pretty high up.
 
Sigh.

I knew it was a matter of time before they figured out some other heavy shit to add to my fucking hat.

First it was the blue flashy light on the back, then the wrap around reflective condom, then it wasn't heavy enough so they required earmuffs (in case you needed double hearing protection).

Then they made it mandatory to wear in all vehicles (and a seat belt too).

I looked really hard online to find something saying that hardhats aren't designed for vehicle collision, or that they increased injury chances by reducing clearance to the roof. No bueno.
I bet there is some study somewhere proving the danger of carrying around xx pounds on your skull

But the insurance weenies care nothing. The actuaries (more likely AI driven algos) tell them they can increase profits by reducing risk all while making the insured comply with added PPE requirements

And they buy off, sorry lobby, the politicians so likely most all this crap gets backed up or enforced by law passed by the insurance company puppets
 
Top Back Refresh