What's new

ESG scores

West Virginia ranked among the top six states for energy production as of 2019, according to data from the Energy Information Administration. Moore characterized pushes from ratings agencies to downgrade energy-producing states as “coercive capitalism,”

nope... it's totalitarianism...
 
This is what they want here. Fucking idiots.




‘Complete Collapse’: Here’s How ESG Destroyed One Nation’s Economy​



  • Sri Lanka has run out of fuel and is facing the worst economic crisis in decades.
  • A chemical fertilizer ban in 2021, part of an initiative to cut nitrogen waste and implement greener farming practices, drastically reduced crop yields and damaged Sri Lanka’s trade balance.
  • “The decision to overnight shift away from synthetic fertilizers was an absolute disaster,” economist Peter Earle told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Sri Lanka is in a last-ditch effort to stave off economic collapse after an allegedly climate-friendly ban on artificial fertilizers devastated one of the country’s largest industries, according to experts.


Sri Lanka has been wracked with poverty, inflation and fuel shortages on a massive scale, with the Prime Minister declaring Tuesday that the country has gone “bankrupt,” according to Business Insider. A ban on chemical fertilizers, implemented April 2021 in an effort to promote organic farming, proved the final straw after a string of missteps, decimating Sri Lanka’s primary source of income and forcing it into bankruptcy, experts told The Daily Caller News Foundation.


“Our economy has faced a complete collapse,” Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said on June 23, according to CNN.


The government lifted the fertilizer ban in November 2021, but the damage had already been done, Peter Earle, a former financial markets trader and economist at the American Institute for Economic Research, told TheDCNF.


“The decision to overnight shift away from synthetic fertilizers was an absolute disaster,” he said.


A 2019 bombing and COVID-19 lockdowns crushed tourism in Sri Lanka and lead to a dearth of foreign exchange reserves, putting a strain on imports of fuel and other necessities, according to data from the CIA World Factbook. But a loss of foreign currency only set the stage for catastrophe, according to Earle, when the fertilizer ban devastated Sri Lanka’s domestic crops.


“Agriculture is built not just on science, but it’s built on decades and centuries of trial and error and hard won experience,” said Earle. “There’s a certain degree of know-how in markets and in certain areas where the government should defer to the expertise of people in markets, people who are practitioners, rather than letting bureaucrats rule.”


Earle’s comments accorded with those of Breakthrough Institute founder and leading climate policy thinker Ted Nordhaus, who argued that synthetic fertilizers represent the most “economically and environmentally efficient” way to sustain Sri Lanka’s demanding agricultural sector in an essay from March.


The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated in the report that crop production for the 2021-2022 season decreased by 40% to 50%, and so far farmers have only utilized a quarter of the available land for the upcoming season, according to a report dated June 9.


Environment Minister Mahinda Amaweera declared a government initiative to save the earth from “our own geoengineering misuse, greed and selfishness” in 2020 ahead of a forum on halving nitrogen waste. The move was part of Sri Lanka’s effort to pursue environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals; the country signed onto a green finance taxonomy with the International Finance Corporation in May that included a commitment to organic fertilizers.


“If you want to go organic you have to cut down more forests to have enough production, because fertilizer use enhances crop production,” Vijay Jayaraj, a research associate at the Co2 Coalition, explained to TheDCNF. “And if you’re cutting down fertilizers, then it means that you need more land to produce enough crops to even meet the domestic demand.”


Sri Lanka gets a significant portion of its revenues from the tourism industry, and nearly a third of Sri Lanka’s population is involved in the agricultural industry, according to the World Factbook.


Inflation in Sri Lanka stood at 54.6% in June, according to Trading Economics, with food prices rising 80.1% and transportation 128% since May, Reuters reported. Half a million people have sunk into poverty as of early 2022, The Guardian reported.


“To the extent that any part of this organic agriculture decision was made based upon some version of green or green from the ideologies, this is just the first of many unintended consequences we’ve seen from these kinds of policies,” said Earle.


The Sri Lankan government restricted supplies and activities to only those deemed essential on June 28 in the face of fuel shortages until new shipments arrive in two weeks, CNN reported—shipments for which Energy Minister Kanchana Wijesekera said the government cannot afford to pay, according to The Guardian. Wijesekera warned Monday that the country had less than a day’s worth of fuel left under normal demand.


Protesters have been flooding the streets for months, demanding the officials reform the government or step down—punishment for historic bank deficits, import shortages and greed amongst those in power, according to Reuters.


Meanwhile, Indian and China have vied to bail out Sri Lanka and deprive one another of an opportunity to expand its global influence, The Associated Press reported.


The International Monetary Fund visited Sri Lanka from June 20-30, ending with “constructive and productive discussions” on reform and loans, including an Extended Fund Facility arrangement to be worked out in detail over the coming weeks, according to a press release.


Sri Lanka has an almost perfect ESG score at 98.1, tied with Tajikistan, according to data from World Economics. For comparison, Sweden sits at 96.1 and the United States at 50.7.


Sri Lanka can recover from the economic collapse, but it will take severe austerity measures and possible switching to an alternative currency for domestic use to cap inflation, according to Earle.


The Sri Lankan ministries of Agriculture and Environment did not respond to TheDCNF’s requests for comments.



From here:
 
The state of Florida will divest $2 billion from BlackRock due to the asset management company’s efforts to advance the environmental, social, and governance movement, also known as ESG.

Florida CFO Jimmy Patronis announced that the Florida Treasury “will be taking its business elsewhere” for $1.4 billion worth of long-term securities and $600 million worth of short-term overnight investments by the beginning of next year. The official contended that the mission to “change the world” promoted by BlackRock CEO Larry Fink exposes the state’s resources to risks.



“Whether stakeholder capitalism, or ESG standards, are being pushed by BlackRock for ideological reasons, or to develop social credit ratings, the effect is to avoid dealing with the messiness of democracy. I think it’s undemocratic of major asset managers to use their power to influence societal outcomes,” Patronis remarked in a press release. “Using our cash, however, to fund BlackRock’s social-engineering project isn’t something Florida ever signed up for.”

The divestment appears to be the largest such effort among other Republican state governments, that have recently pulled funds from prominent asset managers over concerns that the companies’ voting priorities, such as pressuring portfolio companies to transition away from fossil fuels, constitute the mismanagement of public assets. In addition to divestments from South Carolina, Louisiana, Missouri, West Virginia, and Utah, the government of Texas said that BlackRock and nine other firms had violated state law by “refusing to deal with” companies involved in the production and use of fossil fuels “without an ordinary business purpose.”

As the efforts from conservative state officials and broader concerns from the marketplace made headlines, Fink recently announcedthat institutional clients would be able to vote their shares rather than allow the firm to operate as a proxy. BlackRock has taken “voting action on climate issues” against dozens of its portfolio companies, according to an investment stewardship report, leading other officials to note that such activism might work against their state economies and could raise nationwide energy prices.
 
this company does carbon recapture with limestone

 
this company does carbon recapture with limestone

They should be sued for genocide
 

Gawdamnit Mikel…… give us a copy/paste!!!!!!
:flipoff2::flipoff2::flipoff2:

Did you subscribe to DW???? I e been thinking about it!!!!
 
A coalition of Republican state attorneys general accused International Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis of violating state and federal law through their commitments to the environmental, social, and corporate governance movement, also known as ESG.

The two companies, which constitute a “duopoly” in providing proxy voting recommendations to institutional shareholders, are each committed to encouraging the implementation of net zero carbon emissions goals, according to a letter endorsed by 21 attorneys general provided to The Daily Wire. The document noted that proxy advisor recommendations “must be free from false or misleading material information” under federal law and added that many states “have prohibitions on unfair or deceptive trade practices.”



“Your duties include acting with reasonable diligence and without conflicts of interest. These agreements also typically require that you consider only one goal: the economic value of the investments,” the officials wrote. “The publicly available statements and actions of ISS and Glass Lewis in the performance of their duties as proxy advisors raise serious questions about whether both have violated their statutory and contractual duties.”

ISS has announced that it will “generally vote against” board directors who neglect to decrease greenhouse gas emissions, while Glass Lewis bases proxy voting recommendations on whether a given company is pursuing “net zero emissions goals,” according to the letter. Both have announced efforts to push “racial, ethnic, or sex-based diversity under arbitrary quotas.”

“Because these firms have a duopoly in the proxy advisory market, they exercise enormous influence in advancing the ESG movement,” Attorney General Sean Reyes said in a statement provided to The Daily Wire. “A proxy advisor must prioritize the economic value of their clients’ investments. Unfortunately, it appears these two companies are prioritizing political activism.”


The campaign from the attorneys general follows Republican state treasurers divesting some $12 billion from asset management company BlackRock, a leading proponent of the ESG movement, over the past year. The investment philosophy says firms have a responsibility beyond maximizing profits for shareholders and should actively impact outcomes regarding climate, diversity, and other social matters.

The letter to ISS and Glass Lewis called upon the two firms to provide information on how executives “determine ‘appropriate’ emissions reduction targets for each company and the financial basis for your determination” and “any analysis you conducted to determine that insurance companies’ discrimination based on race and sex would not violate the law.”

Republican officials have contended that ESG presents a threat to their states’ ability to fundraise on the bond market as entities seeking access to capital markets see downgrades linked to cultural matters unrelated to financial health. Beyond discouraging investments into the oil and gas sectors, ESG activists pushed stockholders for companies such as Walmart and Lowe’s to consider abortion-related proposals ahead of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.


Lawmakers have also asserted that undue hesitancy toward fossil fuel investments from prominent asset management companies has contributed to record energy prices.

A motion filed by several attorneys general with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission sought to prevent Vanguard from buying shares in publicly traded utilities out of a concern that the company’s climate efforts would raise prices and decrease grid reliability. The firm responded by ceasing involvement with the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, under which signatories vow to move portfolio companies closer to eliminating net carbon emissions.

.....
 
Saw a report yesterday that the state of Texas has banned the bank CITI Corp from participating in the Texas bond market, just like they banned
J.P. Morgan because those banks are anti 2A. The Texas bond market is a multi-billion $$$$$$$$ market. Hit them in the pocketbook.
 
I was wanting to look where my $ is being invested by the mutual funds through my bank. Think I will finally make some phone calls/emails and get it yanked out of anything to do with ESG,
 
People in Vermont may be liberal, but they’re not stupid. Especially when it comes to finances.
8f6df93c-da9b-43fb-b8db-1e27769e2a81_text.gif
 
Top Back Refresh