BDK
Red Skull Member
I don't think this has been brought up here before. I don't see it happening nationwide just because it would even out the playing field for states with large cities that vote primarily blue no matter what and also with large rural areas that vote primarily red, but it just seems like a fairer system to me.
Congressional district method
There are two versions of the congressional district method: one has been implemented in Maine and Nebraska; another, proposed, in Virginia. Under the implemented means, one electoral vote goes per the plurality of the popular votes of each congressional district; and two per the statewide popular vote. This may result in greater proportionality. It has often acted as the other states result, as in 1992. Then George H. W. Bush won all five of Nebraska's electoral votes with a clear plurality on 47% of the vote; in a truly proportional system, he would have received three and Bill Clinton and Ross Perot each would have received one.[SUP][132][/SUP]
In 2013, the Virginia proposal was tabled. This would distribute the electoral votes based on the popular vote winner within each of Virginia's congressional districts; the two statewide electoral votes would be awarded based on which candidate won the most congressional districts.[SUP][133][/SUP]
A congressional district method is more likely to arise than other alternatives to the winner-takes-whole-state method, in view of the main two parties resistance to scrap first-past-the-post. State legislation is sufficient to use this method.[SUP][134][/SUP] Advocates of the method believe the system encourages higher voter turnout and/or incentivizes candidates, often, to visit and appeal to states deemed "safe", overall, for one party.[SUP][135][/SUP] Winner-take-all systems ignore thousands of popular votes; in Democratic California there are Republican districts, in Republican Texas there are Democratic districts. Because candidates have an incentive to campaign in competitive districts, with a district plan, candidates have an incentive to actively campaign in over thirty states versus about seven "swing" states.[SUP][136][/SUP][SUP][137][/SUP] Opponents of the system, however, argue candidates might only spend time in certain battleground districts instead of the entire state and cases of gerrymandering could become exacerbated as political parties attempt to draw as many safe districts as they can.[SUP][138][/SUP]
Unlike simple congressional district comparisons, the district plan popular vote bonus in the 2008 election would have given Obama 56% of the Electoral College versus the 68% he did win; it "would have more closely approximated the percentage of the popular vote won [53%]".[SUP][139][/SUP]
Implementation
Of the 43 multi-district states whose 514 electoral votes are amenable to the method, Maine (4 EV) and Nebraska (5 EV) use it.[SUP][140][/SUP] Maine began using the congressional district method in the election of 1972. Nebraska has used the congressional district method since the election of 1992.[SUP][141][/SUP][SUP][142][/SUP] Michigan used the system for the 1892 presidential election,[SUP][132][/SUP][SUP][143][/SUP][SUP][144][/SUP] and several other states used various forms of the district plan before 1840: Virginia, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, and New York.[SUP][145][/SUP]
The congressional district method allows a state the chance to split its electoral votes between multiple candidates. Prior to 2008, neither Maine nor Nebraska had ever split their electoral votes.[SUP][132][/SUP] Nebraska split its electoral votes for the first time in 2008, giving John McCain its statewide electors and those of two congressional districts, while Barack Obama won the electoral vote of Nebraska's 2nd congressional district.[SUP][146][/SUP] Following the 2008 split, some Nebraska Republicans made efforts to discard the congressional district method and return to the winner-takes-all system.[SUP][147][/SUP] In January 2010, a bill was introduced in the Nebraska legislature to revert to a winner-take-all system;[SUP][148][/SUP] the bill died in committee in March 2011.[SUP][149][/SUP] Republicans had passed bills in 1995 and 1997 to do the same, vetoed by Democratic Governor Ben Nelson.[SUP][147][/SUP]
Recent abandoned adoption in other states
In 2010, Republicans in Pennsylvania, who controlled both houses of the legislature as well as the governorship, put forward a plan to change the state's winner-takes-all system to a congressional district method system. Pennsylvania had voted for the Democratic candidate in the five previous presidential elections, so some saw this as an attempt to take away Democratic electoral votes. Although Democrat Barack Obama won Pennsylvania in 2008, he won 55% of its popular vote. The district plan would have awarded him 11 of its 21 electoral votes, a 52.4% which was much closer to the popular vote percentage.[SUP][150][/SUP][SUP][151][/SUP] The plan later lost support.[SUP][152][/SUP] Other Republicans, including Michigan state representative Pete Lund,[SUP][153][/SUP] RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, have floated similar ideas.[SUP][154][/SUP][SUP][155][/SUP]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College#Congressional_district_method
https://www.bustle.com/articles/191...t-method-maine-nebraska-do-things-differently
https://www.270towin.com/alternative-electoral-college-allocation-methods/
Map of 2016 election if we were on the Congressional District Method.
Congressional district method
There are two versions of the congressional district method: one has been implemented in Maine and Nebraska; another, proposed, in Virginia. Under the implemented means, one electoral vote goes per the plurality of the popular votes of each congressional district; and two per the statewide popular vote. This may result in greater proportionality. It has often acted as the other states result, as in 1992. Then George H. W. Bush won all five of Nebraska's electoral votes with a clear plurality on 47% of the vote; in a truly proportional system, he would have received three and Bill Clinton and Ross Perot each would have received one.[SUP][132][/SUP]
In 2013, the Virginia proposal was tabled. This would distribute the electoral votes based on the popular vote winner within each of Virginia's congressional districts; the two statewide electoral votes would be awarded based on which candidate won the most congressional districts.[SUP][133][/SUP]
A congressional district method is more likely to arise than other alternatives to the winner-takes-whole-state method, in view of the main two parties resistance to scrap first-past-the-post. State legislation is sufficient to use this method.[SUP][134][/SUP] Advocates of the method believe the system encourages higher voter turnout and/or incentivizes candidates, often, to visit and appeal to states deemed "safe", overall, for one party.[SUP][135][/SUP] Winner-take-all systems ignore thousands of popular votes; in Democratic California there are Republican districts, in Republican Texas there are Democratic districts. Because candidates have an incentive to campaign in competitive districts, with a district plan, candidates have an incentive to actively campaign in over thirty states versus about seven "swing" states.[SUP][136][/SUP][SUP][137][/SUP] Opponents of the system, however, argue candidates might only spend time in certain battleground districts instead of the entire state and cases of gerrymandering could become exacerbated as political parties attempt to draw as many safe districts as they can.[SUP][138][/SUP]
Unlike simple congressional district comparisons, the district plan popular vote bonus in the 2008 election would have given Obama 56% of the Electoral College versus the 68% he did win; it "would have more closely approximated the percentage of the popular vote won [53%]".[SUP][139][/SUP]
Implementation
Of the 43 multi-district states whose 514 electoral votes are amenable to the method, Maine (4 EV) and Nebraska (5 EV) use it.[SUP][140][/SUP] Maine began using the congressional district method in the election of 1972. Nebraska has used the congressional district method since the election of 1992.[SUP][141][/SUP][SUP][142][/SUP] Michigan used the system for the 1892 presidential election,[SUP][132][/SUP][SUP][143][/SUP][SUP][144][/SUP] and several other states used various forms of the district plan before 1840: Virginia, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, and New York.[SUP][145][/SUP]
The congressional district method allows a state the chance to split its electoral votes between multiple candidates. Prior to 2008, neither Maine nor Nebraska had ever split their electoral votes.[SUP][132][/SUP] Nebraska split its electoral votes for the first time in 2008, giving John McCain its statewide electors and those of two congressional districts, while Barack Obama won the electoral vote of Nebraska's 2nd congressional district.[SUP][146][/SUP] Following the 2008 split, some Nebraska Republicans made efforts to discard the congressional district method and return to the winner-takes-all system.[SUP][147][/SUP] In January 2010, a bill was introduced in the Nebraska legislature to revert to a winner-take-all system;[SUP][148][/SUP] the bill died in committee in March 2011.[SUP][149][/SUP] Republicans had passed bills in 1995 and 1997 to do the same, vetoed by Democratic Governor Ben Nelson.[SUP][147][/SUP]
Recent abandoned adoption in other states
In 2010, Republicans in Pennsylvania, who controlled both houses of the legislature as well as the governorship, put forward a plan to change the state's winner-takes-all system to a congressional district method system. Pennsylvania had voted for the Democratic candidate in the five previous presidential elections, so some saw this as an attempt to take away Democratic electoral votes. Although Democrat Barack Obama won Pennsylvania in 2008, he won 55% of its popular vote. The district plan would have awarded him 11 of its 21 electoral votes, a 52.4% which was much closer to the popular vote percentage.[SUP][150][/SUP][SUP][151][/SUP] The plan later lost support.[SUP][152][/SUP] Other Republicans, including Michigan state representative Pete Lund,[SUP][153][/SUP] RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, have floated similar ideas.[SUP][154][/SUP][SUP][155][/SUP]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College#Congressional_district_method
https://www.bustle.com/articles/191...t-method-maine-nebraska-do-things-differently
https://www.270towin.com/alternative-electoral-college-allocation-methods/
Map of 2016 election if we were on the Congressional District Method.