What's new
By:
Filters

Bin Laden family owns a mansion in CA

Fishnbeer

Fishnbeer

The dude abides
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Member Number
1907
Messages
527
Loc
CA
How the F do they own a mansion in LA? How is that family allowed in the US at all? And how do they have millions of dollars to buy goddamn mansions?

I dont think anyone was aware until mansions started getting tagged in LA, this one was vacant and for sale and taggers came in and covered it top to bottom. What the fuckin fuck

 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
If I remember right they have a big construction company.

The rest of it falls in my question of why did we invade Afghanistan after 9/11 and not Saudi Arabia? Other then harboring some terrorists there ain't shit that made it worth that area over Saudi.
 
speed bump said:
If I remember right they have a big construction company.

The rest of it falls in my question of why did we invade Afghanistan after 9/11 and not Saudi Arabia? Other then harboring some terrorists there ain't shit that made it worth that area over Saudi.
Click to expand...
That we still pretend that Saudi is any type of "ally" is just pathetic cuck bullshit. Hell, basically our entire foreign aid cottage industry of grift is pathetic cuck bullshit. We make stipulations, we say there will be consequences, but there's never any teeth behind any of it. The aid still flows. The defense contractor deals still get approved.
 
speed bump said:
The rest of it falls in my question of why did we invade Afghanistan after 9/11 and not Saudi Arabia? Other then harboring some terrorists there ain't shit that made it worth that area over Saudi.
Click to expand...
IIRC that the "family members" were flown to Saudi Arabia after the Twin Towers fell- :homer:
 
Thefishguy77 said:
Only American citizens should be allowed to own property in America.
Change my mind.
Click to expand...
Do you feel the same about US citizens and owning homes in other countries?

What if you wanted to buy a nice little beach vacation house in South America. Should you not be allowed?
I know there are a lot of different rules country to country, some you can buy, some you buy the home and rent the land, etc.
 
Wheelin66bronco said:
Do you feel the same about US citizens and owning homes in other countries?

What if you wanted to buy a nice little beach vacation house in South America. Should you not be allowed?
I know there are a lot of different rules country to country, some you can buy, some you buy the home and rent the land, etc.
Click to expand...
I feel like we shouldn't give a shit how other countries want to do it :flipoff2:

If it's allowed, go ahead and buy it 🤷
 
Thefishguy77 said:
Only American citizens should be allowed to own property in America.
Change my mind.
Click to expand...
You would end up having Americans being paid to buy homes for foreigners. Similar to an LLC purchasing homes and renting them out. It would not change a single thing unless you used government to remove privacy from people's lives. So if a Bun Laden family member, or other extremely wealthy foreigner wants to pay me $500k to own a house and let them live there feel free to reach out.
 
Wheelin66bronco said:
Do you feel the same about US citizens and owning homes in other countries?

What if you wanted to buy a nice little beach vacation house in South America. Should you not be allowed?
I know there are a lot of different rules country to country, some you can buy, some you buy the home and rent the land, etc.
Click to expand...

Not only do I think that, I'm moving to a country where thats the way it works. I have zero issues with that, we should always be looking out for America first
 
But shouldn't citizenship be originating in property ownership?
as government is a territorial monopoly supposed to protect those who are signatories (or supporters or the expropriated or whatever) it'd make more sense to be the other way around where you need to be a property owner first before any government intervention can be made

Feels like one of those johnny come lately 'egalitarianism is the path' changes to the structure of the state.
 
[486] said:
But shouldn't citizenship be originating in property ownership?
as government is a territorial monopoly supposed to protect those who are signatories (or supporters or the expropriated or whatever) it'd make more sense to be the other way around where you need to be a property owner first before any government intervention can be made

Feels like one of those johnny come lately 'egalitarianism is the path' changes to the structure of the state.
Click to expand...

Citizenship should have no bearing on property ownership. I you and the seller can make an agreement without involving the government.
 
[486] said:
But shouldn't citizenship be originating in property ownership?
as government is a territorial monopoly supposed to protect those who are signatories (or supporters or the expropriated or whatever) it'd make more sense to be the other way around where you need to be a property owner first before any government intervention can be made

Feels like one of those johnny come lately 'egalitarianism is the path' changes to the structure of the state.
Click to expand...
That would be a collective you approve of?:laughing:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh