What's new
By:
Filters

Any guesses as to who is accused or rolled up in this Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein mess?

Yota Up said:
What if you were an "associate" of his and only did stock trades with the guy?
Click to expand...
He drew people into his circle by pretending to be some investment wizard. It remains unclear how much of his financial success was investment and how much was developing and satisfying evil appetites in the elite and then blackmailing any that step out of line.

He had cameras everywhere, if someone engaged with him even a little he had some kind of leverage.
 
[486] said:
then it becomes "men can't be raped, or victims?"

boiling it down further, you're putting sex/gender into a place where it doesn't belong
maybe I'm just sensitive to it since I end up interacting far too much with trannies that do that whole jamming gender where it don't belong thing
Click to expand...
Heterosexual relationships are governed by a fundamental imbalance of supply and demand. You cannot ignore this reality when reasoning about them. Men bitching about being raped by women are like scrapyard owners bitching that they showing up to find a burned hulk of a car left by the gate overnight. Sure it might not come with the signed title you need to feel warm and fuzzy about it but at the end of the day it's not a real big problem for you. And every other scrapyard owner knows this to be fairly true so even if you do have some particular reason to be extra annoyed they know you're not the norm.

Now, when you start talking homosexual relationships (of both types) things get different...
 
Last edited:
arse_sidewards said:
Heterosexual relationships are governed by a fundamental imbalance of supply and demand. You cannot ignore this reality when reasoning about them. Men bitching about being raped like women are like scrapyard owners bitching that they showing up to find a burned hulk of a car left by the gate overnight. Sure it might not come with the signed title you need to feel warm and fuzzy about it but at the end of the day it's not a real big problem for you.
Click to expand...
Send your address over, I'll get the bleach and ether warmed up for you

east_beast said:
This is some real woke shit you're on tonight. :lmao:
Click to expand...
fuck yourself
 
[486] said:
Send your address over, I'll get the bleach and ether warmed up for you
Click to expand...
I made a rather small but significant verbiage typo correction in there.:laughing:

Also there's multiple molecules that are "ether" and IIRC the shit in a can is unsuitable for use as an anesthetic.
 
Anyone know if Durbin has been asked or has he stated his reasoning against bringing this to light?

Funny, I was watching Tucker last night on Twitter while I was eating and he mentioned Durbin and said something like he was the most evil/disgusting/something person in the Senate. I know he is liberal trash but that seemed a bit harsh. Maybe Tucker knows something that someone has whispered in his ear???

Whoever is on there needs to be asked about it.
 
MigGunslinger said:
He drew people into his circle by pretending to be some investment wizard. It remains unclear how much of his financial success was investment and how much was developing and satisfying evil appetites in the elite and then blackmailing any that step out of line.

He had cameras everywhere, if someone engaged with him even a little he had some kind of leverage.
Click to expand...
That was my take on it. Young stock broker meets a cute girl at a party. she takes him to her hotel room, next morning you’ve got a sex tape with a 16 year old being held over your head.

just give ol’ Jeff here 10 million to invest, and we’ll put that tape back in the vault.

I’m sure there are plenty of really fucked up people on that list, but probably a bunch of unwitting participants too.
 
Last edited:
His history is a bit murky, but it looks like he was involved with all sorts of high level fuckers including Leslie Wexler, Adnan Khosoggi, Harvey Wienstein, etc. and the Towers Financial group. He was dirty from the git.
 
Republicans that make too much noise. World leaders that are jot friendly with the current administration. Possibly democrats that are planning on retiring. Any major media personality that doesn’t tow the line. Most names will be redacted for security reasons.
 
east_beast said:
At the end of the day, I'll honestly be shocked if we don't get a heavily redacted list with any names released that "they" don't want released. If they don't want you burned, you won't be on the list.
Click to expand...


The only names on the list will be those that are deceased. Oddly, much like most democratic party voters. :laughing:
 
It does beg the question after all this time "Why now?". It's just in time, and like the vote count, won't reflect reality.
 
dntsdad said:
Funny, I was watching Tucker last night on Twitter while I was eating and he mentioned Durbin and said something like he was the most evil/disgusting/something person in the Senate. I know he is liberal trash but that seemed a bit harsh.
Click to expand...
Here is that piece of shits, pearl harbor post, to show you the caliber of cocksucker he is.
1000001008.jpg
 
dntsdad said:
Anyone know if Durbin has been asked or has he stated his reasoning against bringing this to light?

Funny, I was watching Tucker last night on Twitter while I was eating and he mentioned Durbin and said something like he was the most evil/disgusting/something person in the Senate. I know he is liberal trash but that seemed a bit harsh. Maybe Tucker knows something that someone has whispered in his ear???

Whoever is on there needs to be asked about it.
Click to expand...
One of the longest tenured politicians and he's a Democrat from Illinois, of course he's a disgusting piece of shit.
 
I wonder if the list is what Hillary was referring to when she said she’d take down much of DC with her if she went to Jail. :stirthepot:
 
arse_sidewards said:
I made a rather small but significant verbiage typo correction in there.:laughing:

Also there's multiple molecules that are "ether" and IIRC the shit in a can is unsuitable for use as an anesthetic.
Click to expand...
thus the bleach, ****
Learn you some rape.
 
rugger said:
It does beg the question after all this time "Why now?". It's just in time, and like the vote count, won't reflect reality.
Click to expand...
Its far enough away from the initial scandal. And far enough away from election season. After all goldfish and sheep have short memories. They will be able to campaign on the fact the released it but nobody will actually look at the, probably highly redacted, list. Now my question is what are they using this as a distraction from/for? Or is it just to torpedo every representative and senator who doesn’t go along to get along?
 
[486] said:
Google you up "bleach and ether"
Click to expand...
I tried. It's all sanitized shit these days. All I got was chemical compatibility charts and various "dangers of mixing cleaners" stuff.

Found this fucking gem though. :laughing:

Of course I'm still to chemistry illiterate to make sense of it.

Screen Shot 2023-12-21 at 9.53.58 AM.png
 
[486] said:
chloroform
Click to expand...
And is it suitable for anesthetic use?

I haven't looked into it in years ago but I recall that there's more to it than just "making chloroform". You need something more specific than that. Something about multiple ions being suitable for the reaction but the final product only being "right" or maybe not having other toxic shit with when you use specific ones.
 
Poke said:
No way will any bombshell names be listed.

I think they are doing this so people will drop the ‘Epstein’ talk
Click to expand...

Agreed. I'm cautiously optimistic though, we're way overdue for something like this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh