What's new

Any guesses as to who is accused or rolled up in this Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein mess?

Epstein and Maxwell have to be the only sex traffickers ever who sex trafficked to apparently no one.
Regardless of what else did or didn't happen, she was constantly finding young girls specifically for "my Jeffrey".
 
Last edited:
So Durbin is a Senator and blocked a senate request for a subpoena. Cant the House do one ? :idea:

I truly dont know.
 
1703032120206.png


Should be able to look to see who fought the civil case right? :dustin:
 
HAPPY NEW YEAR!



https://www.cbsnews.com/us?ftag=CNM-16-10abg0d
The names of more than 170 associates of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could be made public next month after a ruling from a US judge.

Prince Andrew is expected to be among them, if evidence is released from a woman who claims he groped her in 2001.

The identities are being revealed under a settled lawsuit against sex trafficker and Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

Anyone on the list has until 1 January to appeal to have their name removed.

Epstein, a millionaire financier known to mix with high-profile figures like Prince Andrew, died in jail in 2019.

His death, as he awaited federal sex-trafficking charges, was ruled to be a suicide by the New York medical examiner.

The 51-page ruling issued on Monday by New York Judge Loretta Preska calls for Epstein's connections to be "unsealed in full".

Some "J. Does" are minors and possible victims, and Preska ruled that those names and "any identifying information" will remain sealed.

When will the list of names be released?

The ruling stated that the list of names will be made public on Jan. 1, 2024, giving the listed "J. Does" about 14 days to object to the publication of their names.

The ruling allows any "impacted Doe the opportunity to appeal," the court documents said. After the window to appeal closes, the documents will be unsealed and posted to the docket.

What were the accusations against Epstein?

Epstein was accused of sexually assaulting countless teenage girls, some of them as young as 14 years old, according to prosecutors. Epstein allegedly exploited a vast network of underage girls for him and his wealthy clients to have sex with at his homes in Manhattan; Palm Beach, Florida; and his private island near St. Thomas. He was also accused of utilizing a network of employees to ensure continued access to victims.

Britain's Prince Andrew is one of the high-profile figures who has been accused of being one of Epstein's alleged co-conspirators. Giuffre has alleged that she and the British royal had sex in three locations when she was underage. Andrew has denied any wrongdoing and has said he didn't know anything about Epstein's criminal behavior.
 
It is set to be made public Jan 1, per the article I posted.
The article says those who DO NOT appeal it will be made public. He's asking basically are we going to see all the names.

When will the list of names be released?

The ruling stated that the list of names will be made public on Jan. 1, 2024, giving the listed "J. Does" about 14 days to object to the publication of their names.

The ruling allows any "impacted Doe the opportunity to appeal," the court documents said. After the window to appeal closes, the documents will be unsealed and posted to the docket.
 
The article says those who DO NOT appeal it will be made public. He's asking basically are we going to see all the names.

When will the list of names be released?

The ruling stated that the list of names will be made public on Jan. 1, 2024, giving the listed "J. Does" about 14 days to object to the publication of their names.

The ruling allows any "impacted Doe the opportunity to appeal," the court documents said. After the window to appeal closes, the documents will be unsealed and posted to the docket.
Yeah, what will be interesting is to see who DGAF and who wants to be J Doe.
 
The article says those who DO NOT appeal it will be made public. He's asking basically are we going to see all the names.

When will the list of names be released?

The ruling stated that the list of names will be made public on Jan. 1, 2024, giving the listed "J. Does" about 14 days to object to the publication of their names.

The ruling allows any "impacted Doe the opportunity to appeal," the court documents said. After the window to appeal closes, the documents will be unsealed and posted to the docket.


Surely the judge is going to only allow legitimate appeals to go through....like minors and whatnot. Right? RIGHT?
 
I'm all for any of the girls who were victims, underage or not, appealing to get their names off the list. Everyone else? As Elon said, go fuck yourself. Time to face the consequences.
"females can't be rapists nor groomers"
bro, don't be a retard
 
It’d be cool to see who tried to get anonymity that the judge laughed at. That’s the list of people 1st up against the wall. Directly followed by the rest of the abusers including Ghislane.
 
What if you were an "associate" of his and only did stock trades with the guy?
I wonder what the ratio is between people who were just there to hang out with rich and powerful people and people who were there to do nasty shit. You figure that when the rich and powerful are about there's a ton of people riding their coattails trying to get business done in a way that's favorable to them and their buddies. Lots of people will turn a blind eye to an orgy that's got a few dozen teenagers in the mix if it means they get something that's worth a few mil to them.
 
"females can't be rapists nor groomers"
bro, don't be a retard

I guess you missed the part about "any of the girls WHO WERE VICTIMS". They've specifically said that the victims' names are on this list. Yeah, if you were a victim I absolutely support your right to not get your name blasted all over the world for being a victim of sex trafficking. How in the fuck is that a controversial stance? :laughing:
 
then it becomes "men can't be raped, or victims?"

boiling it down further, you're putting sex/gender into a place where it doesn't belong
maybe I'm just sensitive to it since I end up interacting far too much with trannies that do that whole jamming gender where it don't belong thing
 
I wonder what the ratio is between people who were just there to hang out with rich and powerful people and people who were there to do nasty shit. You figure that when the rich and powerful are about there's a ton of people riding their coattails trying to get business done in a way that's favorable to them and their buddies. Lots of people will turn a blind eye to an orgy that's got a few dozen teenagers in the mix if it means they get something that's worth a few mil to them.

Disclose the flight manifests. If you went once I can entertain an argument that you didn't realize what it was. It better be a damn good argument because I have a hard time buying it since I would assume these people are getting prescreened to make sure they're going to take the bait. But if you're on the flight manifests multiple times there's is absolutely no doubt.
 
then it becomes "men can't be raped, or victims?"

boiling it down further, you're putting sex/gender into a place where it doesn't belong
maybe I'm just sensitive to it since I end up interacting far too much with trannies that do that whole jamming gender where it don't belong thing

If there are male victims they can certainly be excluded too I just haven't heard about any male victims. Yeah, you're definitely being too sensitive. :laughing:
 
But if you're on the flight manifests multiple times there's is absolutely no doubt.
Is there?

This is a circle of people in which people play with life and death like it's nothing. Funding for "freedom fighters". Money to warlords to greenlight permits for bullshit. Funding for "virus research" in some far off lab. Some dickbags sleeping with teenagers doesn't really move the needle much to the people who deal in such matters.
 
Top Back Refresh