What's new

1988 Samurai Turned Buggy

Isn't that the worst of both worlds? I the the 16v block sucked and 1.3 head sucked? Is it the_ham_sami that has a 16v head on a 1.3 block?

Honestly, just go 2.0 or 2.3. Even the 2.0 is 125hp, which is probably double of a worn out 8v.
I have the 1.6 block with a 1.3 head. I’ve heard all the talk that the 1.3 block and crank is stronger, and that the turbo will break the 1.6. I’ve had a turbo on my engine for five years and I beat on it. No failures. They used to say the 1.3 had on the 1.6 block created more compression. But according to PetroWorks, that is not true. But there is nothing wrong with the 1.3 head.
 
Shannon Campbell had that setup, moonbuggy competing in WERock in the early 2000’s. You can find videos of it on YouTube.

Tiny was the first, way back in the day. They became semi popular for we rock after that.

Shannon was the first one I saw with a front engine promod using a veedub. He pulled off the craziest thing I've seen at we rock Oroville. Basically a concrete 1/4 pipe with like 8' of vertical wall and a 90* break over. He launched it like 5 times with lance jerking on the rope to get the front end down. He would belly out and couldn't get it. He finally launched it to where the back tires cleared the ledge by a few feet, slammed down on the belly and pulled through :smokin:

Not sure if there is a video out there or not
 
I have the 1.6 block with a 1.3 head. I’ve heard all the talk that the 1.3 block and crank is stronger, and that the turbo will break the 1.6. I’ve had a turbo on my engine for five years and I beat on it. No failures. They used to say the 1.3 had on the 1.6 block created more compression. But according to PetroWorks, that is not true. But there is nothing wrong with the 1.3 head.

If that 1.6l ever hit rev limiter…or numerous times, the block is probably junked. Unless you have a girdle, which you might.

But they’ll run fine even when they crack and you’ never know. When you tear it down you’ll know and cylinder 1 and 2 will be split at the crank bearing. Ask me how I know. :flipoff2:
 
I have the 1.6 block with a 1.3 head. I’ve heard all the talk that the 1.3 block and crank is stronger, and that the turbo will break the 1.6. I’ve had a turbo on my engine for five years and I beat on it. No failures. They used to say the 1.3 had on the 1.6 block created more compression. But according to PetroWorks, that is not true. But there is nothing wrong with the 1.3 head.

I guess I didn't mean the 1.3 head was bad, just that it will never flow what a 16v head would flow.

No matter the combo, boost is really the only way you'll make any kinda of power.
 
If that 1.6l ever hit rev limiter…or numerous times, the block is probably junked. Unless you have a girdle, which you might.

But they’ll run fine even when they crack and you’ never know. When you tear it down you’ll know and cylinder 1 and 2 will be split at the crank bearing. Ask me how I know. :flipoff2:
I’ve had the head off last year. Visual inspection was good. I’ve never torn apart the bottom end. After years of beating on it, I may find out if you’re right. I can tell it needs some tlc. But it still ran great 2 days ago when I went wheeling.
 
I’ve had the head off last year. Visual inspection was good. I’ve never torn apart the bottom end. After years of beating on it, I may find out if you’re right. I can tell it needs some tlc. But it still ran great 2 days ago when I went wheeling.

I had to go back and look at my other thread (build threads are so handy), to confirm. My engine had good compression, seemed fine, ran fine, and then I tore it down.


That engine came from a 1996 Sidekick that was used like a SXS. No girdle on the bottom end either. I could have probably ran it with no issue, but it seemed like a waste to tear it all down and rebuild it knowing the block was cracked.

This is why I’m hesitant to use a 1.6l on a buggy. I’ll just keep hunting down a good 2.0 donor.
 
I had to go back and look at my other thread (build threads are so handy), to confirm. My engine had good compression, seemed fine, ran fine, and then I tore it down.


That engine came from a 1996 Sidekick that was used like a SXS. No girdle on the bottom end either. I could have probably ran it with no issue, but it seemed like a waste to tear it all down and rebuild it knowing the block was cracked.

This is why I’m hesitant to use a 1.6l on a buggy. I’ll just keep hunting down a good 2.0 donor.
Now you’re making me nervous. I had good compression on all 4. Not sure what direction I would go, if this block is not reusable. I don’t want to change the entire drivetrain. That means revamping the entire buggy. Don’t want to do that.
 
Now you’re making me nervous. I had good compression on all 4. Not sure what direction I would go, if this block is not reusable. I don’t want to change the entire drivetrain. That means revamping the entire buggy. Don’t want to do that.

I would seriously just look for donors. I can find parts Trackers for $350 all day. Pull the engine and part the rest out. Stock pile 1.6ls. :laughing:
 
Listen…I can just keep my Chevy, delete the AFM/DOD, and run that LS. My 4l60E has already been built by an excellent transmission builder who built it for my towing. The computer has also been custom tuned on HP tuners.

So TECHNICALLY, I could go LS, 4l60E, Atlas, and 9” and 42’s…but, I want to get wheeling within the next 5 years. Those axle builds alone cost a pile.

In the meantime, I’ll keep listening to Greg tell me everything will be okay on the Toyotas, while you tell me I’m going to kill a busload of nuns and should drink bleach for even considering Toyotas on my 60HP driveline. :flipoff2:
Meh, I started out building a bunch of Toyotas then got to hating the pos Toyota front axle completely to stuffing one tons under my last Toyota buggy. This was in the late 2000’s and I had right at $10k in the front D60. That was then, no idea what it cost to build one today and that’s not counting how much I put into the 14B rear either. Like a dumbass I let things get out of hand from there and ended up building twin steer Rockwell axles LS TH400 203/205 buggy on 44’s.

It cost a lot to wheel that beast from much more fuel consumption to hauling that fat ass buggy around until I pulled the plug completely in 18 and sold everything and all parts too.

Like a dumbass again I’m looking at a small wheeling rig again. So these OG SXS golf carts interest me for light weight, easy to haul around and take trail riding once in a while not full on dedicated wheelin like I used to do.

Honestly, I’ll have more fun building something then wheeling much anyway and if it’s too much of a pita, I’ll pull the plug on this one too.

I say stick to the build you have going on as I wanna see it built and your progress through it.

I will say one thing negative about the Toyota manual crash boxes. Maybe it was me but I could never get the gear oil to stop pouring out of the shifter levers when upside down. I ruined several seats and clothes due to this. Maybe there was a better shifter boot or something out there. Twin sticks mostly from marlin crawler.
 
Now you’re making me nervous. I had good compression on all 4. Not sure what direction I would go, if this block is not reusable. I don’t want to change the entire drivetrain. That means revamping the entire buggy. Don’t want to do that.

If you get to that point, a 2.0 or 2.3 should fit in the same place.

2.0 is 125hp na, 2.3 is 160hp iirc

Coil pack on each cyl and respond to boost well from what I've read.

The 99-05 or whatever trackers and vitara they came in seem to pop up a lot as no one seems to want them like the early ones. They are even in junk yards unlike the early ones.
 
If you get to that point, a 2.0 or 2.3 should fit in the same place.

2.0 is 125hp na, 2.3 is 160hp iirc

Coil pack on each cyl and respond to boost well from what I've read.

The 99-05 or whatever trackers and vitara they came in seem to pop up a lot as no one seems to want them like the early ones. They are even in junk yards unlike the early ones.
WI’ll a TH180 bolt up? Or will I have to get an adapter? Are there adapters?
 
Speaking of Trail Tough…

IMG_2376.jpeg
 
Speaking of Trail Tough…

Nice, I haven't seen someone use the ringR in a while.

That’s great news. 165hp without a power adder and a fuel gauge sounds good to me. 👍

Don't quote me on the 2.3 number, it's been a while. They're also damn hard to find, plus usually need 2.0 parts to work in a "rwd" application. They came in suzuki aerio's.

Edit: damn it, shouldn't have looked, there is an aerio near me for $650.... Double edit: there's another for $750 :laughing:
 
Last edited:
I am definitely grabbing the first $350 2.0 Chevy Tracker I find and rebuilding the engine. :laughing:
 
Nice, I haven't seen someone use the ringR in a while.



Don't quote me on the 2.3 number, it's been a while. They're also damn hard to find, plus usually need 2.0 parts to work in a "rwd" application. They came in suzuki aerio's.

Edit: damn it, shouldn't have looked, there is an aerio near me for $650.... Double edit: there's another for $750 :laughing:
Yeah I see people swapping out the 2.0 EFI throttle body and other parts on them to work. Imo that’s a waste as they’re installing a smaller throttle body then what was on it so = power loss

Buuuut, so the TH180 will bolt to a 2.0?

It’s fun fawking up op’s thread too :flipoff2:
 
I am definitely grabbing the first $350 2.0 Chevy Tracker I find and rebuilding the engine. :laughing:
The 4 doors are cheaper to come by for parts then the 2 door but most I see listed have blown engines. My thoughts are some 500lbs fat women with brats put most of the miles on it and what’s motor oil anyway right? By blown I mean spun rod which is a crank, rod and if it goes on too long the piston bitch slaps the cylinder head beating in a new combustion chamber radius.

I will let you know on my tracker strip down thread once I dig into the engine. Best I can tell it has two spun rod bearings in it. It’s a mystery dontcha know?
 
Yeah I see people swapping out the 2.0 EFI throttle body and other parts on them to work. Imo that’s a waste as they’re installing a smaller throttle body then what was on it so = power loss

Buuuut, so the TH180 will bolt to a 2.0?

It’s fun fawking up op’s thread too :flipoff2:

It's just to make it work in rwd orientation vs fwd.

Yes, 2.0 to TH180 is easy. Just need this

 
The 4 doors are cheaper to come by for parts then the 2 door but most I see listed have blown engines. My thoughts are some 500lbs fat women with brats put most of the miles on it and what’s motor oil anyway right? By blown I mean spun rod which is a crank, rod and if it goes on too long the piston bitch slaps the cylinder head beating in a new combustion chamber radius.

I will let you know on my tracker strip down thread once I dig into the engine. Best I can tell it has two spun rod bearings in it. It’s a mystery dontcha know?

It’s because you’re in Missouri. Everyone in Missouri drives like a damn idiot, so it’s no wonder those engines blow up. Any interstate time and it’ll kill any engine. :flipoff2:

And there’s probably more tech in my threads from derailment than what’s left on the whole internet anymore. Like the Snow Tracker thread and all the Dana 30 swap information. Good stuff.
 
It’s because you’re in Missouri. Everyone in Missouri drives like a damn idiot, so it’s no wonder those engines blow up. Any interstate time and it’ll kill any engine. :flipoff2:

And there’s probably more tech in my threads from derailment than what’s left on the whole internet anymore. Like the Snow Tracker thread and all the Dana 30 swap information. Good stuff.
I won’t argue with you about that but, I drive in a bunch of states from Wisconsin to Louisiana and there’s idiot drivers everywhere :flipoff2:
 
Finally got the transfer case and crawl box all done and put together. Doing the rear seal on the transmission and it will all be ready to bolt together. I’m not sure how far in detail I’m going to clean this stuff. Getting tired of scrubbing.

Engine is also pretty much ready to go.

Chassis should be to me next week or the week after.

IMG_2396.jpeg
IMG_2315.jpeg
 
Top Back Refresh