Win!

Why can't they spin the fancy mirror in circles and have the software and electronics be low latency enough that the aim point hasn't moved enough to matter by the time you do a follow up with the big laser?

Or spin it even faster and have it scan on one rev and fire on the next when it sees a mosquito sized object?

Basically, they can, just not for $700.
 

New Skyraider II 'Swiss Army Knife' Joins AFSOC Fleet​


2fd6b085-9e88-4068-b23f-d702cfb67467-1052x615.jpg
The OA-1K Skyraider II. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons, public domain)
In recent weeks, in the skies over Iran, we saw the value of high-tech as a force multiplier. American stealth aircraft and smart weapons dealt staggering damage to Iran's armed forces, to the point that all they have left are a few boats that are essentially water skiing speedboats with machine guns, and a few hundred goblins with AK-47s.


Low-tech played a significant part in this, too. Once air dominance over Iran was established, which took the USA and Israel about six minutes, our A-10 and B-52s were operating with impunity in Iranian airspace, doing what they do best: Dealing with a problem by the suitable application of high explosives.

Speaking of low-tech, the United States Air Force has now taken possession of 18 of their latest low-and-slow close air support birds: The OA-1K Skyraider II.

The Air Force now has 18 new light attack aircraft that are designed to support special operations forces on the ground, and it expects to receive “a handful more” by October, said Lt. Col. Robert Wilson, of Air Force Special Operations Command, or AFSOC.

The single-engine turboprop OA-1K Skyraider II is “essentially a Swiss Army Knife of airborne capability,” that can fly armed reconnaissance, close air support, and precision strike missions, said Wilson, AFSOC’s armed overwatch requirements branch chief.

The Skyraider is designed to support operations that range from counter-terrorism to “aspects of full-on conflict,” Wilson told reporters on Friday. It is capable of carrying weapons, including Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System, or APKWS, laser-guided rockets, and the plane also has rails and pylons on its wings so it can be equipped with more advanced weapons and sensors in the future.

The new plane is named in honor of the A-1 Skyraider of Vietnam fame, also an aircraft that performed beyond anyone's expectations.





The new aircraft, as I wrote back when it was first introduced, is the product of good old American ingenuity, in which someone said, "Hey, what would happen if we stuck guns and rocket pods on a cropduster?"

Now the Air Force has something new along these lines: The OA-1K Skyraider II, to be assigned to the United States Special Operations Command. The OA-1K was, we note, developed by L3Harris from their AT-802 Air Tractor - a cropduster. And the new plane, aside from having a storied name in close-air support, has plenty of capability in its own right.
Low tech is all right. Low and slow, when it comes to close air support, is downright essential. And the Skyraider II is so good at this, that the primary gunsight appears to be an over-the-counter item you can pick up at any gun shop.



It looks like, despite asking for 75 of these, the Air Force will only be getting 53.

But due to “resource constraints and competing priorities,” a total of 53 Skyraider IIs are funded under President Donald Trump’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2027, according to AFSOC public affairs.

“The 75 quantity figure is the program record,” Wilson said. “I would say, as the capability sponsor, less than 75 is not desirable. We would like to see it at the program record of 75, but just, just being pragmatic, obviously, with resource constraints that could potentially limit the program less than that.”
The face of warfare is constantly changing. High-tech is great, yes, especially if the United States ever gets embroiled in a near-peer conflict. What the Skyraider II shows us, though, is that there's still a place in the inventory for something like this: An aircraft that already existed, was already adept at flying low, slow, and making sharp maneuvers; that is, in case you weren't aware of it, primarily what crop-dusters do. All we had to do was arm it.

In World War II, the Soviet Union strapped machine guns and light bombs onto Polikarpov Po-2 biplane trainers. These aircraft, known to their crews as Kukuruzniks - Wheatcutters - and they had seen pre-war use as not only trainers but, you guessed it, crop-dusters. Armed and flying by night, these things made the German troops in Russia maladjusted; their pilots, mostly women, would do things like switch off the engine, glide silently into where a German unit was laagered, and light them up with machine-gun fire before buzzing away at treetop level. If one encountered a German Messerschmitt, one could shake off the much faster German fighter by going into a tight circle that the German pilot couldn't match.


There's a place in war for these kinds of things. The new OA-1k is something that a Kukuruznik pilot would have looked at with envy.
 
I remember reading an article that the author wondered why the AF didn't replace the radial engine in the SkyRaider with a turbine, back in the 70s
 
Last edited:

New Skyraider II 'Swiss Army Knife' Joins AFSOC Fleet​


2fd6b085-9e88-4068-b23f-d702cfb67467-1052x615.jpg
The OA-1K Skyraider II. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons, public domain)
In recent weeks, in the skies over Iran, we saw the value of high-tech as a force multiplier. American stealth aircraft and smart weapons dealt staggering damage to Iran's armed forces, to the point that all they have left are a few boats that are essentially water skiing speedboats with machine guns, and a few hundred goblins with AK-47s.


Low-tech played a significant part in this, too. Once air dominance over Iran was established, which took the USA and Israel about six minutes, our A-10 and B-52s were operating with impunity in Iranian airspace, doing what they do best: Dealing with a problem by the suitable application of high explosives.

Speaking of low-tech, the United States Air Force has now taken possession of 18 of their latest low-and-slow close air support birds: The OA-1K Skyraider II.



The new plane is named in honor of the A-1 Skyraider of Vietnam fame, also an aircraft that performed beyond anyone's expectations.





The new aircraft, as I wrote back when it was first introduced, is the product of good old American ingenuity, in which someone said, "Hey, what would happen if we stuck guns and rocket pods on a cropduster?"


Low tech is all right. Low and slow, when it comes to close air support, is downright essential. And the Skyraider II is so good at this, that the primary gunsight appears to be an over-the-counter item you can pick up at any gun shop.



It looks like, despite asking for 75 of these, the Air Force will only be getting 53.


The face of warfare is constantly changing. High-tech is great, yes, especially if the United States ever gets embroiled in a near-peer conflict. What the Skyraider II shows us, though, is that there's still a place in the inventory for something like this: An aircraft that already existed, was already adept at flying low, slow, and making sharp maneuvers; that is, in case you weren't aware of it, primarily what crop-dusters do. All we had to do was arm it.

In World War II, the Soviet Union strapped machine guns and light bombs onto Polikarpov Po-2 biplane trainers. These aircraft, known to their crews as Kukuruzniks - Wheatcutters - and they had seen pre-war use as not only trainers but, you guessed it, crop-dusters. Armed and flying by night, these things made the German troops in Russia maladjusted; their pilots, mostly women, would do things like switch off the engine, glide silently into where a German unit was laagered, and light them up with machine-gun fire before buzzing away at treetop level. If one encountered a German Messerschmitt, one could shake off the much faster German fighter by going into a tight circle that the German pilot couldn't match.


There's a place in war for these kinds of things. The new OA-1k is something that a Kukuruznik pilot would have looked at with envy.

I don't know if you can call those things low tech just because the airframe is slow and turbo prop.

Them things got all the isr gear.

The ten percent true podcast had a 3 part series with one of the test pilots for that program.
 
This one? I flew with Walker on gunships back in the day.
 
This one? I flew with Walker on gunships back in the day.
Yeah.

It seems like they packed every modern sensor and communications equipment in the inventory into a crop duster.
 
I don't know if you can call those things low tech just because the airframe is slow and turbo prop.

Them things got all the isr gear.

The ten percent true podcast had a 3 part series with one of the test pilots for that program.
Reading that article what really bugs me is that this is exactly the kind of thing where they'll just take the missiles off and give a bunch to every police agency.
 
Reading that article what really bugs me is that this is exactly the kind of thing where they'll just take the missiles off and give a bunch to every police agency.
Predators would be cheaper for dhs to run and i have no doubt they're already using them.

The new sky raider is because predators don't have a human in them to coordinate with troops on the ground real time. It also has a full c2 comms suite to uplink everyone in theater to the larger battle net.
 
The new sky raider is because predators don't have a human in them to coordinate with troops on the ground real time. It also has a full c2 comms suite to uplink everyone in theater to the larger battle net.
Which is fine, let the tech trickle down.

I want all that stuff for a ****ty marketplace crop duster. :homer:
 
So that's what the bottom percentile of graduating Air Force pilots get to fly? **** ugly AF. :laughing:
It's exclusively operated by the special forces people, so not the bottom of the barrel.
It's the new sandy, and those dudes are no ****ing joke. Top tier pilots doing sketchy ****.
 
Predators would be cheaper for dhs to run and i have no doubt they're already using them.

The new sky raider is because predators don't have a human in them to coordinate with troops on the ground real time. It also has a full c2 comms suite to uplink everyone in theater to the larger battle net.
I dont think predators have the maneuverability that little crop duster does
 
Top Back Refresh