Interesting Trucks for Sale

1974 F700 with marmon Harrington 4wd conversion in pretty damn good shape.

1758463581225.png



 
The blue dent got one important thing right. Make the rear fenders match. That's the biggest thing I don't like about most of the medium duty builds.
I tried to find two similar builds to show what I mean.
images.jpg
1645103555_3100f718-3c8c-4953-ab51-b1ecac36f078_mmthumb.jpeg


I have so many builds rattling around in my head and one of these is in it. Right after my 60-66 medium duty. Stock long grain truck style frame, crew cab long bed, 8.3 Cummins, 6spd eaton, m923 transfer case, FMTV meritor axles with eco hubs, 385\65R22.5's on 22.5x12.25 alcoas. Not that I've thought about this a bunch or anything.....
 
The blue dent got one important thing right. Make the rear fenders match. That's the biggest thing I don't like about most of the medium duty builds.
I tried to find two similar builds to show what I mean.
images.jpg
1645103555_3100f718-3c8c-4953-ab51-b1ecac36f078_mmthumb.jpeg


I have so many builds rattling around in my head and one of these is in it. Right after my 60-66 medium duty. Stock long grain truck style frame, crew cab long bed, 8.3 Cummins, 6spd eaton, m923 transfer case, FMTV meritor axles with eco hubs, 385\65R22.5's on 22.5x12.25 alcoas. Not that I've thought about this a bunch or anything.....
You don’t like the DRW fenders in back and the MDT front together? As in, with your two suburbans, you like the second one better than the first?
 
You don’t like the DRW fenders in back and the MDT front together? As in, with your two suburbans, you like the second one better than the first?
Correct. The stock pickup dually fenders cover the tires fine but to me they look out of place with the medium duty fronts. I'm not going to call the stock dually fenders ugly or anything like that and there are a ton of builds that look really nice that use them. They are available off the shelf and fit the beds so I know why people use them but it almost looks to me like using the wrong bed on a normal truck, like you have a bullnose ford with a superduty bed on it.

I plan on making fender flares out of the 60-66 medium duty fenders for my 63 GMC to keep it looking somewhat factory but with room for the bigger tires while not needing to sit 3ft off the ground.

78 crewcab semi.jpg
Good looking truck but the fender mismatch bothers my OCD.
 
Correct. The stock pickup dually fenders cover the tires fine but to me they look out of place with the medium duty fronts. I'm not going to call the stock dually fenders ugly or anything like that and there are a ton of builds that look really nice that use them. They are available off the shelf and fit the beds so I know why people use them but it almost looks to me like using the wrong bed on a normal truck, like you have a bullnose ford with a superduty bed on it.

I plan on making fender flares out of the 60-66 medium duty fenders for my 63 GMC to keep it looking somewhat factory but with room for the bigger tires while not needing to sit 3ft off the ground.

78 crewcab semi.jpg
Good looking truck but the fender mismatch bothers my OCD.
And I think that thing looks killer! I like that way better than this. I’m not sure what those rear fenders are but I’m out.
 
When I look at this truck, the low running board jumps out at me. (And I hate it)

IMG_2712.jpeg


The only thing I don’t like about this truck is the step under the tank step and the drop hitch.

IMG_2713.jpeg


To me, nothing can hang down below about 2/3 of the tire height. If the hitch can be removed, it would be alright.

This this is bad ass!

IMG_2714.jpeg
 
That Suburban with the fancy electric drop steps like the blue dent instead of the stock medium duty style would look better for sure but he just extended the stock drop steps they come with. If you look at the white crew cab I posted it has the same style step because the factory front fenders come down that far.
00o0o_2IqpFR5l3mH_600x450'60.jpg
00606_8PE1r0QU3qn_600x450'60.jpg


Here is a 60-66 style fender where the lower section is part of the step instead of the fender so it lets you tuck them up a bit more. I'm planning no lower extension but then going to run something like 2x6 or 2x8 steel as running boards\air tanks.
 
neat but not $400k cool. :eek:

In that budget, a Toterhome and a 4 runner in the trailer with roof top tent for overlanding duty is probably operating within a couple MPGs of that 550 too.
You could put 4x4 MDT donor parts under a well build schoolie toter 4.5x over for that price.
 
You could put 4x4 MDT donor parts under a well build schoolie toter 4.5x over for that price.
right, you could; but my solution was 4x less ghetto (plus instant gratification; the only tool you have to use is your wallet).
:flipoff2:
 
Last edited:
right, but my solution was 4x less ghetto (plus instant gratification; the only tool you have to use is your wallet).
:flipoff2:
Fine then, bluebird wanderlodge and car hauler trailer.

I figure that a schoolie purpose built by another would be better for what we do though.
 
Fine then, bluebird wanderlodge and car hauler trailer.

I figure that a schoolie purpose built by another would be better for what we do though.
i mean, let's be honest; even if you build your skoolie for $80k ($400k/4.5x over claim) Are you or I ever really going to enjoy wheeling our $80-100k high-COG overlander anywhere you actually need 4wd to get to???
(I'll be much more relaxed parking the toter and wheel the $10-15k rig to wherever in the backcountry)
 
Last edited:
Top Back Refresh