What they never taught in schools.

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    What they never taught in schools.


    #2
    get the fuck out of here with this nazi apologia bull shit. Stalin was directing the german communist party during the rise of the NatSoc party. Stalin created the Anti-Fascista party to beat up, disorganize, and intimidate the German Socialist party members into become communists. Instead of doing that, all the fractured socialist parties banded together and became the Nazi party. Stalin wasnt a Jew.

    Furthermore, nazism is just as pozzed as Communism. Its godless, immoral authoritarianism. End of story.

    EDIT to add, all atheists are stupid faggots who deny science.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by IEATRKS84 View Post
      get the fuck out of here with this nazi apologia bull shit. Stalin was directing the german communist party during the rise of the NatSoc party. Stalin created the Anti-Fascista party to beat up, disorganize, and intimidate the German Socialist party members into become communists. Instead of doing that, all the fractured socialist parties banded together and became the Nazi party. Stalin wasnt a Jew.

      Furthermore, nazism is just as pozzed as Communism. Its godless, immoral authoritarianism. End of story.

      EDIT to add, all atheists are stupid faggots who deny science.

      Agreed on all points but the last one.
      Why do you say this?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by ev13wt View Post


        Agreed on all points but the last one.
        Why do you say this?
        I could write a book on it, really. But to start, here is a great video to listen to that is a solid foundation to build off of.



        EDIT

        For the TL;DW crowd, basically we can disprove darwin's theory of evolution using math and fossils. Darwin's theory works well at describing why certain animals might have thicker fur or longer beaks. but the theory does not hold up when it comes to the emergence of species themselves. Theres just not enough time to have passed for the math to add up. That opens to door to the possibility of "intelligent design", even though these scientists arent arguing for the presence of a "God" per se, but just that something like that should be considered. The issue is that MANY people cling to the theory of evolution like a religion and refuse to discuss the fact its been disproven.
        Last edited by IEATRKS84; 06-22-2020, 08:04 AM.

        Comment


          #5
          And if you say Atheism ist wrong period - could you accept the idea that God could have had absolutely nothing to do with this universe?

          Comment


            #6
            Watching the video now. At minute 1:52: Darwin cannot explain the creation of new species. I will agree. At least not the "human" species. Why use God to explain this point? But let me finish the video first.

            Comment


              #7
              I don't care if you're an atheist, but get that socialist/communism bullshit out of here.

              And Etwit, if you accept the idea of "God" - an allpowerful being, how can you define what he is or isn't capable of?
              Screw Vertical Scope
              Lugnut4x4.com

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Pt_Ranger_v8 View Post
                I don't care if you're an atheist, but get that socialist/communism bullshit out of here.

                And Etwit, if you accept the idea of "God" - an allpowerful being, how can you define what he is or isn't capable of?

                I feel that this universe's creation has nothing directly to do with God. Why do I say that?

                Question: Are humans the only species that can grasp the concept of "time"`? As something separate from "space time continuum"? As in Humans grasp that time, matter can be separate entities?

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'm just curios why the film looks just like all other propaganda bs.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by rugger View Post
                    I'm just curios why the film looks just like all other propaganda bs.
                    Because it is. Its bottom tier, stormfront level nazi propaganda, that only the double digit IQ person would consume without giving it more than 5 seconds of thought.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by IEATRKS84 View Post

                      I could write a book on it, really. But to start, here is a great video to listen to that is a solid foundation to build off of.



                      EDIT

                      For the TL;DW crowd, basically we can disprove darwin's theory of evolution using math and fossils. Darwin's theory works well at describing why certain animals might have thicker fur or longer beaks. but the theory does not hold up when it comes to the emergence of species themselves. Theres just not enough time to have passed for the math to add up. That opens to door to the possibility of "intelligent design", even though these scientists arent arguing for the presence of a "God" per se, but just that something like that should be considered. The issue is that MANY people cling to the theory of evolution like a religion and refuse to discuss the fact its been disproven.


                      I will fully agree that Darwins theory cannot explain life / humanity. As such, it might give an indicator to how biology sometimes works, but that is really it.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by ev13wt View Post



                        I will fully agree that Darwins theory cannot explain life / humanity. As such, it might give an indicator to how biology sometimes works, but that is really it.
                        Right, but do you think theyre teaching children that in schools? That Darwin's theory of evolution has been proven false and theres a possibility for intelligent design? No. They are, and will continue to, teach anti-science to adhere to their religion.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by IEATRKS84 View Post

                          Because it is. Its bottom tier, stormfront level nazi propaganda, that only the double digit IQ person would consume without giving it more than 5 seconds of thought.
                          ^this

                          “I read it on the Internet “

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by IEATRKS84 View Post

                            I could write a book on it, really. But to start, here is a great video to listen to that is a solid foundation to build off of.



                            EDIT

                            For the TL;DW crowd, basically we can disprove darwin's theory of evolution using math and fossils. Darwin's theory works well at describing why certain animals might have thicker fur or longer beaks. but the theory does not hold up when it comes to the emergence of species themselves. Theres just not enough time to have passed for the math to add up. That opens to door to the possibility of "intelligent design", even though these scientists arent arguing for the presence of a "God" per se, but just that something like that should be considered. The issue is that MANY people cling to the theory of evolution like a religion and refuse to discuss the fact its been disproven.
                            That was excellent. Those books will definitely be added to my library

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by IEATRKS84 View Post

                              Right, but do you think theyre teaching children that in schools? That Darwin's theory of evolution has been proven false and theres a possibility for intelligent design? No. They are, and will continue to, teach anti-science to adhere to their religion.

                              Well, did they teach kids about computers in 1925?
                              I thought that is how science works. We take something an run with it until it is disproven. Then we readjust our world view. Book in schools lag behind everything and are suspect to .... well you know.

                              This can, of course, go quite wrong - because humans are humans and once some believe something it is impossible to readjust their views.
                              Ignaz Semmelweis: (from wiki)

                              Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis (1 July 1818 – 13 August 1865) was a Hungarian physician and scientist, now known as an early pioneer of antiseptic procedures. Described as the "saviour of mothers",[2] Semmelweis discovered that the incidence of puerperal fever (also known as "childbed fever") could be drastically cut by the use of hand disinfection in obstetrical clinics. Puerperal fever was common in mid-19th-century hospitals and often fatal. Semmelweis proposed the practice of washing hands with chlorinated lime solutions in 1847 while working in Vienna General Hospital's First Obstetrical Clinic, where doctors' wards had three times the mortality of midwives' wards.[3] He published a book of his findings in Etiology, Concept and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever.

                              Despite various publications of results where hand washing reduced mortality to below 1%, Semmelweis's observations conflicted with the established scientific and medical opinions of the time and his ideas were rejected by the medical community. He could offer no acceptable scientific explanation for his findings, and some doctors were offended at the suggestion that they should wash their hands and mocked him for it.


                              The general talk was: "As if a mans hands are somehow "unclean", get the fuck outta here you fucking retard..."


                              In 1865, the increasingly outspoken Semmelweis supposedly suffered a nervous breakdown and was committed to an asylum by his colleagues. He died 14 days later after being beaten by the guards, from a gangrenous wound on his right hand which might have been caused by the beating. Semmelweis's practice earned widespread acceptance only years after his death, when Louis Pasteur confirmed the germ theory, and Joseph Lister, acting on the French microbiologist's research, practised and operated using hygienic methods, with great success.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X